Procedure planning for chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention

Interventional Cardiology (London)

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 549-557

  McEntegart, Margaret ^a   Spratt, James C ^a  

^a GOLDEN JUBILEE NATIONAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

chronic total occlusion; percutaneous coronary intervention; procedure planning

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; BALLOON CATHETER; CALCIFICATION; CATHETER; CATHETERIZATION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; GUIDE WIRE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; MICROCATHETER; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 84885615288     PISSN: 17555302     EISSN: 17555310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/ica.13.47     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Karmpaliotis D, Lembo N, Kalynych A et al. Development of a high-volume, multiple-operator program for percutaneous chronic total coronary occlusion revascularization: Procedural, clinical, and cost-utilization outcomes. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 82(1), 1-8 (2013).
2. Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, Smith PK, Spertus JA. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 59(9), 857-881 (2012).
3. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ et al.; COURAGE Investigators. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: Results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation 117(10), 1283-1291 (2008).
4. Sianos G, Werner GS, Galassi AR et al. Recanalisation of chronic total coronary occlusions: 2012 consensus document from the EuroCTO Club. EuroIntervention 8, 139-145 (2012
5. Murphy JC, Darragh K, Walsh SJ, Hanratty CG. Efficacy of the RADPAD protective drape during real world complex percutaneous coronary intervention procedures. Am. J. Cardiol. 108(10), 1408-1410 (2011).
6. Patel VG, Brayton KM, Tamayo A et al. Angiographic success and procedural complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary chronic total occlusion interventions: A weighted meta-analysis of 18,061 patients from 65 studies. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 6(2), 128-136 (2013).
7. Morino Y, Kimura T, Hayashi Y et al.; J-CTO Registry Investigators. In-hospital outcomes of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic total occlusion insights from the J-CTO Registry (multicenter CTO registry in Japan). JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 3(2), 143- 151 (2010
8. Morino Y, Abe M, Morimoto T, Kimura T et al.; J-CTO Registry Investigators. Predicting successful guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion of native coronary lesions within 30 minutes: The J-CTO (multicenter CTO registry in Japan) score as a difficulty grading and time assessment tool. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 4(2), 213-221 (2011).
9. Syrseloudis D, Secco GG, Barrero EA et al. Increase in J-CTO lesion complexity score explains the disparity between recanalisation success and evolution of chronic total occlusion strategies: Insights from a single-centre 10-year experience. Heart 99(7), 474-479 (2013).
10. Brilakis ES, Grantham JA, Rinfret S et al. A percutaneous treatment algorithm for crossing coronary chronic total occlusions. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 5(4), 367-379 (2012).
11. Rentrop KP, Cohen M, Blanke H, Phillips RA. Changes in collateral channel filling immediately after controlled coronary artery occlusion by an angioplasty balloon in human subjects. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 5(3), 587-592 (1985).
12. Werner GS, Ferrari M, Heinke S et al. Angiographic assessment of collateral connections in comparison with invasively determined collateral function in chronic coronary occlusions. Circulation 107(15), 1972-1977 (2003).
13. Rathore S, Katoh O, Matsuo H et al. Retrograde percutaneous recanalization of chronic total occlusion of the coronary arteries: Procedural outcomes and predictors of success in contemporary practice. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2(2), 124- 132 (2009).
14. Sianos G, Barlis P, Di Mario C et al.; EuroCTO Club. European experience with the retrograde approach for the recanalisation of coronary artery chronic total occlusions. A report on behalf of the EuroCTO Club. EuroIntervention 4(1), 84- 92 (2008
15. Tsuchikane E, Yamane M, Mutoh M et al.; for the Retrograde Summit Investigators. Japanese multicenter registry evaluating the retrograde approach for chronic coronary total occlusion. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. doi:10.1002/ccd.24823 (2013) (Epub ahead of print).
16. Ueno K, Kawamura A, Onizuka T et al. Effect of preoperative evaluation by multidetector computed tomography in percutaneous coronary interventions of chronic total occlusions. Int. J. Cardiol. 156(1), 76-79 (2012).
17. Magro M, Schultz C, Simsek C et al. Computed tomography as a tool for percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions. EuroIntervention 6(Suppl. G), G123-G131 (2010).