Corrigendum to “A comparison of cervical histopathology variability using whole slide digitized images versus glass slides: experience with a statewide registry” [HUMAN PATHOLOGY 2013;44:2542-2548] (S0046817713002694) (10.1016/j.humpath.2013.06.015));A comparison of cervical histopathology variability using whole slide digitized images versus glass slides: Experience with a statewide registry

Human Pathology

Volumn 44, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 2542-2548

  Gage, Julia C ^a   Joste, Nancy ^b   Ronnett, Brigette M ^c   Stoler, Mark ^d   Hunt, William C ^b   Schiffman, Mark ^a   Wheeler, Cosette M ^b  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Clinical pathology; Reliability Registries; Whole slide imaging

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; GLASS SLIDE; HEALTH SURVEY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE DIGITIZER; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; PATHOLOGIST; REPRODUCIBILITY; TELEPATHOLOGY; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; WART VIRUS;

EID: 84885595412     PISSN: 00468177     EISSN: 15328392     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.04.001     Document Type: Erratum

References (24)

1. W.S. Campbell, S.M. Lele, W.W. West, A.J. Lazenby, L.M. Smith, and S.H. Hinrichs Concordance between whole-slide imaging and light microscopy for routine surgical pathology Hum Pathol 43 2012 1739 1744
2. L. Pantanowitz Digital images and the future of digital pathology J Pathol Inform 1 2010 15
3. L. Pantanowitz, P.N. Valenstein, and A.J. Evans Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology J Pathol Inform 2 2011 36
4. R.S. Weinstein, A.R. Graham, and L.C. Richter Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future Hum Pathol 40 2009 1057 1069
5. J.R. Gilbertson, J. Ho, L. Anthony, D.M. Jukic, Y. Yagi, and A.V. Parwani Primary histologic diagnosis using automated whole slide imaging: a validation study BMC Clin Pathol 6 2006 4
6. A.R. Jara-Lazaro, T.P. Thamboo, M. Teh, and P.H. Tan Digital pathology: exploring its applications in diagnostic surgical pathology practice Pathology 42 2010 512 518
7. D.M. Jukic, L.M. Drogowski, J. Martina, and A.V. Parwani Clinical examination and validation of primary diagnosis in anatomic pathology using whole slide digital images Arch Pathol Lab Med 135 2011 372 378
8. C. Massone, H.P. Soyer, and G.P. Lozzi Feasibility and diagnostic agreement in teledermatopathology using a virtual slide system Hum Pathol 38 2007 546 554
9. P.S. Nielsen, J. Lindebjerg, J. Rasmussen, H. Starklint, M. Waldstrom, and B. Nielsen Virtual microscopy: an evaluation of its validity and diagnostic performance in routine histologic diagnosis of skin tumors Hum Pathol 41 2010 1770 1776
10. S.M. Ismail, A.B. Colclough, and J.S. Dinnen Observer variation in histopathological diagnosis and grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia BMJ 298 1989 707 710
11. H.C. de Vet, P.G. Knipschild, and H.J. Schouten Interobserver variation in histopathological grading of cervical dysplasia J Clin Epidemiol 43 1990 1395 1398
12. T. Creagh, J.E. Bridger, E. Kupek, D.E. Fish, E. Martin-Bates, and M.J. Wilkins Pathologist variation in reporting cervical borderline epithelial abnormalities and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia J Clin Pathol 48 1995 59 60
13. W.G. McCluggage, H. Bharucha, L.M. Caughley, A. Date, P.W. Hamilton, and C.M. Thornton Interobserver variation in the reporting of cervical colposcopic biopsy specimens: comparison of grading systems J Clin Pathol 49 1996 833 835
14. M.H. Stoler, and M. Schiffman Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study JAMA 285 2001 1500 1505
15. A. Malpica, J.P. Matisic, and D.V. Niekirk Kappa statistics to measure interrater and intrarater agreement for 1790 cervical biopsy specimens among twelve pathologists: qualitative histopathologic analysis and methodologic issues Gynecol Oncol 99 2005 S38 S52
16. T.M. Darragh, T.J. Colgan, and J.T. Cox The Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology Standardization Project for HPV-Associated Lesions: background and consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology J Low Genit Tract Dis 16 2012 205 242
17. C.M. Wheeler, W.C. Hunt, and J. Cuzick A population-based study of human papillomavirus genotype prevalence in the United States: Baseline measures prior to mass human papillomavirus vaccination Int J Cancer 132 2013 198 207
18. V.P. Bhapkar A note on equivalence of 2 test criteria for hypotheses in categorical data J Am Stat Assoc 61 1966 228 235
19. S. Vanbelle, and A. Albert A bootstrap method for comparing correlated kappa coefficients J Stat Comput Sim 78 2008 1009 1015
20. X. Sun, and Z. Yang Generalized McNemar's test for homogeneity of the marginal distributions 2008 SAS Global Forum San Antonio, TX
21. H.C. de Vet, P.G. Knipschild, and H.J. Schouten Sources of interobserver variation in histopathological grading of cervical dysplasia J Clin Epidemiol 45 1992 785 790
22. J.L. Fine, D.M. Grzybicki, and R. Silowash Evaluation of whole slide image immunohistochemistry interpretation in challenging prostate needle biopsies Hum Pathol 39 2008 564 572
23. H. Helin, M. Lundin, J. Lundin, P. Martikainen, T. Tammela, and T. van der Kwast Web-based virtual microscopy in teaching and standardizing Gleason grading Hum Pathol 36 2005 381 386
24. College of American Pathologists Validating whole slide imaging systems for diagnostic purposes in pathology Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center 2011 http://www.cap.org/apps/docs/membership/transformation/new/validating.pdf