Comparison of methods to diagnose sarcoidosis [1]

JAMA

Volumn 310, Issue 15, 2013, Pages 1624-

  Madan, Karan ^a   Guleria, Randeep ^a  

^a ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRONCHOSCOPY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GRANULOMA; HUMAN; LUNG; LUNG SARCOIDOSIS; MALE; NOTE; PATHOLOGY;

BRONCHOSCOPY; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GRANULOMA; HUMANS; LUNG; MALE; SARCOIDOSIS, PULMONARY;

EID: 84885594017     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.277314     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. von Bartheld MB, Dekkers OM, Szlubowski A, et al. Endosonography vs conventional bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis: the GRANULOMA randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;309(23):2457-2464.
2. Agarwal R, Srinivasan A, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D. Efficacy and safety of convex probe EBUS-TBNA in sarcoidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Care. 2012;106(6):883-892.
3. Herth F, Becker HD, Ernst A. Conventional vs endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a randomized trial. Chest. 2004;125(1):322-325.