Institutional trust and welfare state support: On the role of trust in market institutions

Journal of Public Policy

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 295-317

  Edlund, Jonas ^a   Lindh, Arvid ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

institutions; Key words attitudes; market; public; trust; welfare state

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; WELFARE IMPACT;

SWEDEN;

EID: 84885587802     PISSN: 0143814X     EISSN: 14697815     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X13000160     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Beauducel A. and Herzberg P. Y. (2006) On the Performance of Maximum Likelihood Versus Means and Variance Adjusted Weight Least Squares Estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling 13(2): 186-203. (Pubitemid 43812907)
2. Bergh A. (2007) Den kapitalistiska välfärdsstaten - om den svenska modellens historia och framtid. Stockholm: Norstedts.
3. Blomberg H. (1999) Do Cutbacks Pay off? Perceived Changes in the Standard of Municipal Services and Attitudes Towards Services Among Citizens and Municipal Decision Makers in Finland. International Journal of Social Welfare 8(3): 206-220.
4. Blomberg H., Kallio J., Kangas O., Kroll C. and NiemeläM. (2012) Attitudes Among High-Risk Groups. In Svallfors S. (ed.), Contested Welfare States. Welfare Attitudes in Europe and Beyond. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 58-80.
5. Blomqvist P. (2004) The Choice Revolution: Privatization of Swedish Welfare Services in the 1990s. Social Policy and Administration 38(2): 139-155. (Pubitemid 38423337)
6. Blomqvist P. and Rothstein B. (2000) Välfärdsstatens nya ansikte. Demokrati och marknadsreformer inom den offentliga sektorn. Stockholm: Agora.
7. Brown T. A. (2006) Confirmatory Factor Analysis. New York: Guilford.
8. Calzada I. and del Pino E. (2008) Perceived Efficacy and Citizen's Attitudes Toward Welfare State Reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences 74(4): 541-574.
9. Chen F. F. (2007) Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indices to Lack of Measurement Invariance. Psychological Bulletin 14(3): 464-504.
10. Crane A., Matten D. and Moon J. (2008) Corporations and Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Crouch C. (2011) The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12. Daly M. and Lewis J. (2000) The Concept of Social Care and the Analysis of Contemporary Welfare States. British Journal of Sociology 51(2): 281-298.
13. Davidov E., Datler G., Schmidt P. and Schwartz S. H. (2011) Testing the Invariance of Values in the Benelux Countries with the European Social Survey: Accounting for Ordinality. In Davidov, E. et al. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Analysis. New York: Routledge, 149-172.
14. Edlund J. (1999) Trust in Government and Welfare Regimes: Attitudes to Redistribution and Financial Cheating in the United States and Norway. European Journal of Political Research 35(3): 341-370.
15. - (2006) Trust in the Capability of the Welfare State and General Welfare State Support: Sweden 1997-2002. Acta Sociologica 49(4): 395-417. (Pubitemid 44745880)
16. Esping-Andersen G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
17. Erikson R. and Goldthorpe J. H. (1992) The Constant Flux. Oxford: Clarendon.
18. Esping-Andersen G. (1985) Politics Against Markets: The Social Democratic Road to Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
19. - (1993) Changing Classes. London: Sage.
20. Ferrarini T., Nelson K., Palme J. and Sjöberg O. (2012) Sveriges socialförsäkringar i jämförande perspektiv. Uppsala Center for Labor studies. Working paper, 2012, 11.
21. Flora D. B. and Curran P. J. (2004) An Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Estimation for Confirmatory Factor Analysis with Ordinal Data. Psychological Methods 9(4): 466-491. (Pubitemid 40005044)
22. Gevers J., Gelissen J., Arts W. and Muffels R. (2000) Public Health Care in the Balance: Exploring Popular Support for Health Care Systems in the European Union. International Journal of Social Welfare 9(4): 285-300.
23. Hall P. A. and Soskice D. (eds.) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Hartman L. (ed.) (2011) Konkurrensens konsekvenser. Vad händer med svensk välfärd? Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
25. Hernes H. (1987) Women and the Welfare State: The Transition from Private to Public Dependence. In Showstack Sassoon A. (ed.), Women and the State. London: Hutchinson, 72-92.
26. Hoel M. and Knutsen O. (1989) Social Class, Gender and Sector Employment as Political Cleavages in Scandinavia. Acta Sociologica 32(2): 181-201.
27. Hollingsworth J. R. and Boyer R. (1997) Contemporary Capitalism: The Embeddedness of Institutions. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Hu L. and Bentler P. M. (1999) Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling 6(1): 1-55.
29. Holmberg S. and Weibull L. (2012) Förtroendet för staten. In Weibull L., Oscarson H. and Bergström A. (eds.), I framtidens skugga. Göteborg: SOM institute, 127-144.
30. Huber E. and Stephens J. D. (2001) Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Johansson SeväI. (2010) Välfärdstatsundersökningen 2010 [The Welfare State Survey 2010]. Umeå : Umeå University.
32. Korpi W. (1983) The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
33. Korpi W. and Palme J. (1998) The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality and Poverty in the Western Countries. American Sociological Review 63(5): 661-687. (Pubitemid 28560735)
34. - (2003) New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalizsation: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975-95. American Political Science Review 97(3): 425-446. (Pubitemid 37155666)
35. Kumlin S. (2004) The Personal and the Political. How Personal Welfare State Experiences Affect Political Trust and Ideology. Gordonsville: Palgrave Macmillan.
36. - (2007a) Overloaded or Undermined? EuropeanWelfare States in the Face of Performance Dissatisfaction''. In Svallfors S. (ed.), The Political Sociology of the Welfare State. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 80-116.
37. - (2007b) The welfare State: Values, Policy Preferences, and Performance evaluations. In Dalton R. J. and Klingeman H. D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 362-382.
38. Lipset S. M. and Schneider W. (1983) The Confidence Gap: Business, Labor, and Government in the Public Mind. New York: Free Press.
39. Marsh H. W., Hau K.-T. and Wen Z. (2004) In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) Findings. Structural Equation Modeling 11(3): 320-341. (Pubitemid 38874703)
40. Muthén B., du Toit S. H. C. and Spisic D. (1997) Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Unpublished manuscript.
41. Muthén L. K. and Muthén B. O. (2007) Mplus User's Guide, 5th ed. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
42. Nye J., Zelikow P. and King D. (eds.) (1997) Why People Don't Trust Government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
43. Orloff A. S. (1993) Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States. American Sociological Review 58(3): 303-328. (Pubitemid 24384635)
44. Rauch D. (2007) Is There Really a Scandinavian Social Service Model? A Comparison of Childcare and Elderly care in Six European Countries. Acta Sociologica 50(3): 249-269.
45. Rose R. (1991) Is American Public Policy Exceptional? In Shafer B. E. (ed.), Is America Different? A New Look at American Exceptionalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 187-229.
46. Rothstein B. (1998) Just Institutions Matter. The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Rothstein B. and Steinmo S. (eds.) (2002) Restructuring theWelfare State: Political Institutions and Policy Change. New York: Palgrave.
48. Schumacker R. E. and Lomax R. G. (2010) A Beginners Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Routledge.
49. Scruggs L. (2006) Generosity of Social Insurance 1971-2002. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22(3): 349-364.
50. SipiläJ. (ed.) (1997) Social Care Services: The Key to the Scandinavian Welfare Model. Aldershot: Avebury.
51. Steinmo S. (1994) American Exceptionalism Reconsidered: Culture or Institutions? In Dodd L. and Jillson C. (eds.), The Dynamics of American Politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 117-124.
52. Svallfors S. (1996) Välfärdsstatens moraliska ekonomi: välfärdsopinionen i 90-talets Sverige. Umeå : Borea.
53. - (2002) Political Trust and Support for the Welfare State: Unpacking a Supposed Relationship. In Rothstein, B. and Steinmo, S. (eds.), Restructuring the Welfare State: Political Institutions and Policy Change. New York: Palgrave, 184-203.
54. - (2006) The Moral Economy of Class. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
55. - (2012) Government Quality, Egalitarianism, and Attitudes to Taxes and Social Spending: A European Comparison. European Political Science Review, doi:10.1017/ S175577391200015X.
56. Trydegård G-B. (2001) Välfärdstjänster till salu - privatisering och alternativa driftformer under 1990-talet. In Szebehely M. (ed.), Välfärdstjänster i omvandling, SOU 2001:52. Stockholm: Fritzes, 77-140.
57. Uslaner E. (2010) Trust and the Economic Crisis of 2008. Corporate Reputation Review 13(2): 110-123.
58. Van Oorschot W. and Meuleman B. (2012) Welfare Performance and Welfare Support. In Svallfors S. (ed.), Contested Welfare States. Welfare Attitudes in Europe and Beyond. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 25-57.
59. Wright E. O. (2004) Beneficial Constraints: Beneficial for Whom? Socio-Economic Review 2(3): 407-414.