The Salmon of Doubt: Six Months of Methodological Controversy within Social Neuroscience

Critical Neuroscience: A Handbook of the Social and Cultural Contexts of Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 273-285

  Margulies, Daniel S ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

"Voodoo correlations in social neuroscience"; "Voodoo correlations" criticism of statistical practice in neuroimaging; Critical tactics in action; Methodological foundation in jeopardy, a neuroscientific irony; Salmon of doubt, controversy within social neuroscience; Scientific debate, statistical practice in fMRI research; Selection bias in analyses, critique of non independence error; Social cognition in atlantic salmon, opaque fMRI statistics; The 2000s, the "decade of social neuroscience"; Vul and colleagues, and "non independence error"

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885553546     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781444343359.ch13     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Abbott, A. (2009). Brain imaging studies under fire. Nature News, 457(245). doi:10.1038/457245a.
2. Aron, A., Badre, D., Brett, M., Cacioppo, J., Chambers, C., Cools, R., & Winkielman, P. (2007, November 14). LETTER; Politics and the brain. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9907E1D91E3CF937A25752C1A9619C8B63.
3. Bardin, J. (2009, February 24). Voodoo that scientists do. Seed Magazine. Retrieved from http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/that_voodoo_that_scientists_do/.
4. Begley, S. (2008, January 9). The "voodoo" science of brain imaging. Lab Notes. Retrieved January 11, 2010, from http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/labnotes/archive/ _2009/01/09/ thevoodoo-science-of-brain-imaging.aspx.
5. Bell, V. (2008, December 29). Voodoo correlations in social brain studies: Mind Hacks. Retrieved December 23, 2009, from http://www.mindhacks.com/blog/2008/12/voodoo_correlations_.html.
6. Bennett, C., Miller, M., & Wolford, G. (2009). Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic salmon: An argument for multiple comparisons correction. NeuroImage, 47(Supplement 1), S125. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(09)71202-9.
7. Diener, E. (2009). Editor's introduction to Vul et al. (2009) and comments. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 272. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01124.x
8. Editorial: What were the neuroscientists thinking? (2009, January 14). New Scientist, (2691). Retrieved from http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126912.800-editorial-whatwere-the-neuroscientists-thinking.html.
9. Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302(5643), 290-292. doi:10.1126/science.1089134.
10. Giles, J. (2009, January 14). Doubts raised over brain scan findings. New Scientist, (2691). Retrieved from http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126914.700-doubts-raisedover-brain-scan-findings.html.
11. Hotz, R. L. (2009, January 15). The brain will take the stand. The Wall Street Journal, A7. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123205921925787437.html.
12. Iacoboni, M., Freedman, J., Kaplan, J., Jamieson, K., Knapp, B., & Fitzgerald, K. (2007, November 11). This is your brain on politics. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/11/opinion/11freedman.html?_r=1.
13. Jabbi, M., Keysers, C., Singer, T., & Stephan, K. E. (2009). "Voodoo correlations in social neuroscience" by Vul et al. - summary information for the press. Retrieved from www.bcn-nic.nl/replyVul.pdf.
14. Joneilortiz. (2008, December 30). Vul on fMRI abuse in the cognitive neuroscience of social interaction. Mutually occluded media & film, design, philosophy, politics. Retrieved December 23, 2009, from http://www.mutuallyoccluded.com/2008/12/vul_fmri_ cognitive_neuroscience_social_interaction/.
15. Kaplan, J. T., Freedman, J., & Iacoboni, M. (2007). Us versus them: Political attitudes and party affiliation influence neural response to faces of presidential candidates. Neuropsychologia, 45(1), 55-64. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.024.
16. Klincewicz, M. (2009, January 23). Does fMRI data show implausibly high correlation? MedicExchange.com. Retrieved December 27, 2009, from http://www.medicexchange.com/MRI-Clinical/does-fmri-data-show-implausibly-high-correlation.html.
17. Kriegeskorte, N., Simmons, W. K., Bellgowan, P. S. F., & Baker, C. I. (2009). Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: The dangers of double dipping. Nature Neuroscience, 12(5), 535-540. doi:10.1038/nn.2303.
18. Lehrer, J. (2009a, January 29). Voodoo correlations: Have the results of some brain scanning experiments been overstated? Mind Matters. Retrieved December 24, 2009, from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=brain-scan-results-overstated.
19. Lehrer, J. (2009b, February 17). In defense of the value of social neuroscience. Mind Matters. Retrieved December 28, 2009, from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=defense-social-neuroscience.
20. Lieberman, M. (2009, January 27). Seth's blog "Blog archive" voodoo correlations in social neuroscience. Seth's blog: Self-experimentation, scientific method, the Shangri-La diet, etc. Retrieved December 27, 2009, from http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2008/12/28/voodoo-correlations-in-social-neuroscience/#comment-258657.
21. Lieberman, M. D., Berkman, E. T., & Wager, T. D. (2009). Correlations in social neuroscience aren't voodoo: A reply to Vul et al. http://www.scn.ucla.edu/pdf/LiebermanBerkman-Wager(invitedreply).pdf.
22. Logothetis, N. K. (2008). What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature, 453(7197), 869-878. doi:10.1038/nature06976.
23. Neurocritic. (2008, December 31). Scan scandal hits social neuroscience. The Neurocritic: Deconstructing the most sensationalistic recent findings in Human Brain Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Psychopharmacology. Retrieved December 23, 2009, from http://neurocritic.blogspot.com/2008/12/scan-scandal-hits-social-neuroscience.html.
24. Neurocritic. (2009, January 13). Voodoo counterpoint. The Neurocritic: Deconstructing the most sensationalistic recent findings in Human Brain Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Psychopharmacology. Retrieved December 29, 2009, from http://neurocritic.blogspot.com/2009/01/voodoo-counterpoint.html.
25. Poldrack, R. A. (2008). The role of fMRI in cognitive neuroscience: Where do we stand? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18(2), 223-227. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2008.07.006.
26. Roberts, S. (2008, December 28). Voodoo correlations in social neuroscience. Seth's blog: Self-Eperimentation, Scientific Method, the Shangri-La Diet, etc. Retrieved December 20, 2009, from http://www.blog.sethroberts.net/2008/12/28/voodoo-correlations-in-social-neuroscience/.
27. Sander, D., Grandjean, D., Pourtois, G., Schwartz, S., Seghier, M. L., Scherer, K. R., & Vuillemier, P. (2005). Emotion and attention interactions in social cognition: Brain regions involved in processing anger prosody. NeuroImage, 28(4), 848-858. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.023.
28. Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303(5661), 1157-1162. doi:10.1126/science.1093535.
29. Vul, E. (2009). Ed Vul - Voodoo rebuttal. Retrieved January 11, 2010, from http://www.edvul.com/voodoorebuttal.php.
30. Vul, E., Harris, C., Winkielman, P., & Pashler, H. (2009). Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 274-290. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01125.x.