Characterisation of productivity limitation of salt-affected lands in different climatic regions of europe using remote sensing derived productivity indicators

Land Degradation and Development

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 438-452

  Ivits, E ^a   Cherlet, M ^a   Toth T ^a   Lewinska K E ^a   Toth G ^a  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Climate; Europe; Land productivity; Remote sensing; Salt affected soils

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE; EUROPE; GROSS PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY; HIGH TEMPORAL RESOLUTION; LAND PRODUCTIVITIES; NORMALISED DIFFERENCE VEGETATION INDEX; REHABILITATION MEASURES; SALT-AFFECTED SOIL;

CLIMATOLOGY; REMOTE SENSING; SOILS; WEATHERING;

PRODUCTIVITY;

CLIMATIC REGION; LAND DEGRADATION; PRIMARY PRODUCTION; REMOTE SENSING; SALINITY; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SOIL; SPOT; VEGETATION INDEX;

EUROPE;

EID: 84885480866     PISSN: 10853278     EISSN: 1099145X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.1140     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ben-Dor E, Patkin K, Banin A, Karnieli A. 2002. Mapping of several soil properties using DAIS-7915 hyperspectral scanner data-a case study over clayey soils in Israel. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23: 1043-1062.
2. Bicheron P, Leroy M, Brockmann C, Krämer U, Miras B, Huc M, Ninõ F, Defourny P, Vancutsem C, Arino O, Ranéra F, Petit D, Amberg V, Berthelot B, Gross D. 2006. GLOBCOVER: A 300m global land cover product for 2005 using ENVISAT/MERIS time series. Proceedings of the Recent Advances in Quantitative Remote Sensing Symposium. Valencia. September 2006.
3. Csillag F, Pasztor L, Biehl LL. 1993. Spectral band selection for the characterization of salinity status of soils. Remote Sensing of Environment. 43: 231-242.
4. Dehaan R, Taylor GR. 2003. Image-derived spectral endmembers as indicators of salinization. International Journal of Remote Sensing 24: 775-794.
5. Eliasson A, Jones RJA, Nachtergaele F, Rossiter DG, Terres J-M, Van Orshoven J, van Velthuizen H, Bottcher K, Haastrup P, Le Bas C. 2010. Common criteria for the redefinition of intermediate less favoured areas in the European Union. Environmental Science & Policy 13: 766-777.
6. ESDB v2.0. The European Soil Database distribution version 2.0. 2004. European Commission and the European Soil Bureau Network, CD-ROM, EUR 19945 EN.
7. Eynard A, Lala R, Wiebe K. 2005a. Crop response in salt-affected soils. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 27: 5-50.
8. Eynard A, Lala R, Wiebe K. 2005b. Salt-affected soils. In: Lal R (ed). Encyclopedia of Soil Science. Second edn. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL.; 1538-1541.
9. FAO. 2000. Land resources potential and constraints at regional and country levels. World Soil Resources Reports 90. FAO, Rome; 114.
10. Farifteh J, Farshad A, George RJ. 2006. Assessing salt-affected soils using remote sensing, solute modelling, and geophysics. Geoderma 130: 191-206.
11. Fernández-Bucesa F, Siebea C, Cramb S, Palaciob JL. 2006. Mapping soil salinity using a combined spectral response index for bare soil and vegetation: A case study in the former lake Texcoco, Mexico. Journal of Arid Environments 65: 644-667.
12. Goetz AF, Vane G, Soloman JE, Rock BN. 1985. Imaging spectrometry for earth remote sensing. Science 228: 1147.
13. Goetz AFH, Herring M. 1989. The high resolution imaging spectrometer (HIRIS) for EOS. IEEE Transactions of Geosciences and Remote Sensensing 27: 136-144.
14. Hick PT, Russell WGR. 1990. Some spectral considerations for remote sensing of soil salinity. Austrian Journal of Soil Research 28: 417-431.
15. Huete, A. 1988. A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sensing of Environment 25: 295-309.
16. Hunt G, Salisbury JW. 1976. Visible and near infrared spectra of minerals and rocks: XII. Metamorphic rocks. Modern Geology 5: 219-228.
17. Ivits E, Buchanan G, Olsvig-Whittaker L, Cherlet M. 2011. European farmland bird distribution explained by remotely sensed phenological indices. Environmental Modeling and Assessment. DOI: 10.1007/s10666-011-9251-9.
18. Jain S, Sharma K, Manchanda M, Singh C. 1988. Physiographic soil classification from multi remote sensing data. Proceedings of the 9th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing. No. 23-29. 17. Bangkok; 1-8.
19. Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F. 2006. World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 15: 259-263.
20. Köppen W. 1900. Versuch einer Klassifikation der Klimate, vorzugsweise nach ihren Beziehungen zur Pflanzenwelt. Geographische Zeitschrift 6: 657-679.
21. Lobell DJ, Lesch SM, Corwin DL, Ulmer MG, Anderson KA, Potts DJ, Doolittle JA, Matos MR, Baltes MJ. 2010. Regional-scale assessment of soil salinity in the Red River Valley using multi-year MODIS EVI and NDVI. Journal of Environmental Quality 39: 35-41. DOI: 10.2134/jeq2009.0140.
22. Manchanda M, Iyer H. 1983. Use of Landsat imagery and aerial photographs for delineation and categorization of salt-affected soils of part of north-west India. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 31: 263-271.
23. McGowen I, Mellyon S. 1996. Detection of dryland salinity using single and multi-temporal Landsat imagery. Proceedings of the 8th Australasian Remote Sensing Conference, Canberra; 26-34.
24. Meir P, Cox P, Grace J. 2006. The influence of terrestrial ecosystems on climate. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21: 254-260.
25. Metternicht G. 2001. Assessing temporal and spatial changes of salinity using fuzzy logic, remote sensing and GIS. Foundations of an expert system. Ecological Modelling 144: 163-179.
26. Metternicht GI, Zinck JA. 2003. Remote sensing of soil salinity: Potentials and constraints. Remote Sensing of Environment 85: 1-20.
27. Mougenot B, Pouget M, Epema GF. 1993. Remote sensing of salt-affected soils. Remote Sensing Reviews 7: 241-259.
28. Pérez González ME, García Rodríguez M, González-Quinones V, Jiménez Ballesta R. 2006. Spatial variability of soil quality in the surroundings of a saline lake environment. Environmental Geology 51: 143-149. DOI: 10.1007/s00254-006-0317-y.
29. Reed BC, Brown JF, VanderZee D, Loveland TR, Merchant JW, Ohlen DO. 1994. Measuring phenological variability from satellite imagery. Journal of Vegetation Science 5: 703-714.
30. Smit HJ, Metzger MJ, Ewert F. 2008. Spatial distribution of grassland productivity and land use in Europe. Agricultural Systems 98: 208-219.
31. Szabó J, Pásztor L, Suba Z ., Várallyay G. 1998. Integration of remote sensing and GIS techniques in land degradation mapping. Agrokémia és Talajtan 47: 63-75.
32. Szabolcs I. 1974. Salt Affected Soils in Europe. Martinus Nijhoff - The Hague and RISSAC - Budapest; 63. + 1:1 000000 scale Map of Salt Affected Soils in Europe.
33. Taylor GR, Mah AH, Kruse FA, Kieren-Young KS, Hewson RD, Bennett BA. 1996a. The extraction of soil dielectric properties from AIRSAR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 17: 501-512.
34. Taylor GR, Mah AH, Kruse FA, Kieren-Young KS, Hewson RD, Bennett BA. 1996b. Characterization of saline soils using airborne radar imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 57: 127-142.
35. Tóth G, Adhikari K, Várallyay G, Tóth T, Bódis K, Stolbovoy V. 2008. Updated map of salt affected soils in the European Union. In Threats to Soil Quality in Europe, Tóth G, Montanarella L Rusco E (eds). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg; 65-77.
36. Verma KS, Saxena RK, Barthwal AK, Deshmukh SN. 1994. Remote sensing technique for mapping salt affected soils. Internatioal Journal of Remote Sensing 15: 1901-1914.
37. Wiegand C, Anderson G, Lingle S, Escobar D. 1994. Soil salinity affects on crop growth and yield. Illustration of an analysis and mapping methodology for sugarcane. Journal of Plant Physiology 148: 418-424.
38. Wiegand C, Richardson A, Escobar D, Gerbermann A. 1991. Vegetation indices in crop assessments. Remote Sensing of Environment 35: 105-119.
39. Zhang M, Ustin S, Rejmankova E, Sanderson E. 1997. Monitoring Pacific coast salt marshes using remote sensing. Ecological Applications 7: 1039-1053.