SWIRL, a clinically validated, objective, and quantitative method for facial wrinkle assessment

Skin Research and Technology

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 492-498

  Jiang, Lily I ^a   Stephens, Thomas J ^a   Goodman, Robert ^a  

^a Thomas J Stephens and Associates Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Photonumeric wrinkle scale; Quantitative analysis; Raking light photography; Wrinkle

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; COSMETIC PRODUCTS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT METHOD; OPTICAL PROFILOMETRY; PHOTONUMERIC WRINKLE SCALE; PRODUCT APPLICATIONS; QUANTITATIVE METHOD; WRINKLE;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; PHOTOGRAPHY; PROFILOMETRY; SURVEYS;

GRADING;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CUTANEOUS PARAMETERS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; OPTICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SWIRL METHOD; VALIDATION PROCESS; WRINKLE;

PHOTONUMERIC WRINKLE SCALE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAKING LIGHT PHOTOGRAPHY; WRINKLE;

COSMETICS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DERMATOLOGY; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIGHT; MALE; PHOTOGRAPHY; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN; SKIN AGING;

EID: 84885478946     PISSN: 0909752X     EISSN: 16000846     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/srt.12073     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Fisher GJ, Kang S, Varani J, Bata-Csorgo Z, Wan Y, Datta S, Voorhees JJ. Mechanisms of photoaging and chronological skin aging. Arch Dermatol 2002; 138: 1462-1470.
2. Kang S, Fisher GJ, Voorhees JJ. Photoaging: pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment. Clin Geriatr Med 2001; 17: 643-659.
3. Yaar M, Gilchrest BA. Photoageing: mechanism, prevention and therapy. Br J Dermatol 2007; 157: 874-887.
4. Rabe JH, Mamelak AJ, McElgunn PJ, Morison WL, Sauder DN. Photoaging: mechanisms and repair. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 55: 1-19.
5. Leyden J, Stephens TJ, Herndon JH Jr. Multicenter clinical trial of a home-use nonablative fractional laser device for wrinkle reduction. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 67: 975-984.
6. McCall-Perez F, Stephens TJ, Herndon JH Jr. Efficacy and tolerability of a facial serum for fine lines, wrinkles, and photodamaged skin. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2011; 4: 51-54.
7. Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Hardas B et al. A validated grading scale for crow's feet. Dermatol Surg 2008; 34 (Suppl. 2): S173-S178.
8. Day DJ, Littler CM, Swift RW, Gottlieb S. The wrinkle severity rating scale: a validation study. Am J Clin Dermatol 2004; 5: 49-52.
9. Fitzpatrick RE, Goldman MP, Satur NM, Tope WD. Pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing of photo-aged facial skin. Arch Dermatol 1996; 132: 395-402.
10. Griffiths CEM, Wang TS, Hamilton TA, Voorhees JJ, Ellis CN. A photonumeric scale for the assessment of cutaneous photodamage. Arch Dermatol 1992; 128: 347-351.
11. Kappes UP. Skin ageing and wrinkles: clinical and photographic scoring. J Cosmet Dermatol 2004; 3: 23-25.
12. JCSS-Guideline. Guidelines for eva-luation of anti-wrinkle products. J Japnaese Cosmet Sci Soc 2007; 31: S411-S431.
13. Stephens TJ, Oresajo C, Goodman G, Yatskayer M, Kavanaugh P. Chapter 6. Novel, compelling non-invasive techniques for evaluating cosmetic products. In: Draelos ZD, ed. Cosmetic dermatology: products and procedures. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010: 47-54.
14. Fujimura T, Haketa K, Hotta M, Kitahara T. Global and systematic demonstration for the practical usage of a direct in vivo measurement system to evaluate wrinkles. Int J Cosmet Sci 2007; 29: 423-436.
15. Hillebrand GG, Miyamoto K, Schnell B, Ichihashi M, Shinkura R, Akiba S. Quantitative evaluation of skin condition in an epidemiological survey of females living in northern versus southern Japan. J Dermatol Sci 2001; 27 (Suppl. 1): S42-S52.