Facial appearance transfer and persistence after three-dimensional virtual face transplantation

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 132, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 957-966

  Chandawarkar, Akash A ^a   Diaz Siso, J Rodrigo ^a   Bueno, Ericka M ^a   Jania, Camille K ^a   Hevelone, Nathanael D ^a   Lipsitz, Stuart R ^a   Caterson, Edward J ^a   Mukundan, Srinivasan ^a   Pomahac, Bohdan ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FACE; FACIAL TRANSPLANTATION; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; YOUNG ADULT; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SURGERY;

ADULT; AGED; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FACE; FACIAL TRANSPLANTATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84885478104     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a0143b     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Pomahac B, Nowinski D, Diaz-Siso JR, et al. Face transplantation. Curr Probl Surg. 2011;48:293-357.
2. Siemionow M, Ozturk C. Face transplantation: Outcomes, concerns, controversies, and future directions. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:254-259.
3. Lantieri L. Face transplant: A paradigm change in facial reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:250-253.
4. G]g S. Facing the consequences of facial transplantation: Individual choices, social effects. Am J Bioeth. 2004;4:37-39.
5. Rumsey N. Psychological aspects of face transplantation: Read the small print carefully. Am J Bioeth. 2004;4:22-25; discussion W23-W31.
6. Fattahi TT. An overview of facial aesthetic units. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:1207-1211.
7. Arno A, Barret JP, Harrison RA, Jeschke MG. Face allo-transplantation and burns: A review. J Burn Care Res. 2012;33:561-576.
8. Maurer D, Grand RL, Mondloch CJ. The many faces of con-fgural processing. Trends Cogn Sci. 2002;6:255-260.
9. Young AW, Hellawell D, Hay DC. Confgurational information in face perception. Perception 1987;16:747-759.
10. Tanaka JW, Farah MJ. Parts and wholes in face recognition. Q J Exp Psychol A 1993;46:225-245.
11. Pomahac B, Afaki P, Nelson C, Balas B. Evaluation of appearance transfer and persistence in central face transplantation: A computer simulation analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:733-738.
12. Xia JJ, Phillips CV, Gateno J, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis for computer-aided surgical simulation in complex cranio-maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:1780-1784.
13. Baccarani A, Follmar KE, Das RR, et al. A pilot study in sub-SMAS face transplantation: Defning donor compatibility and assessing outcomes in a cadaver model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:121-129.
14. Afaki P, Nelson C, Balas B, Pomahac B. Simulated central face transplantation: Age consideration in matching donors and recipients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:e283-e285.
15. Pomahac B, Diaz-Siso JR, Bueno EM. Evolution of indications for facial transplantation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:1410-1416.
16. Pomahac B, Pribaz J, Eriksson E, et al. Restoration of facial form and function after severe disfgurement from burn injury by a composite facial allograft. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:386-393.
17. Howden LM, Meyer JA, Age and Sex Composition: 2010. U.S. Census Bureau 2010 Census Briefs. 2011:C2010BR-03.
18. Washington KM, Zanoun RR, Cadogan KA, Afrooz PN, Losee JE. Composite tissue allotransplantation for the reconstruction of congenital craniofacial defects. Transplant Proc. 2009;41:523-527.