Effect of predictor traits on accuracy of genomic breeding values for feed intake based on a limited cow reference population

Animal

Volumn 7, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1759-1768

  Pszczola, M ^a,b   Veerkamp, R F ^a   De Haas, Y ^a   Wall, E ^c   Strabel, T ^b   Calus, M P L ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b POZNA UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

accuracy; bias; dairy cow; genomic selection; multi trait analyses

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CATTLE; EVALUATION STUDY; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; IRELAND; METHODOLOGY; NETHERLANDS; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; UNITED KINGDOM;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMAL NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; IRELAND; NETHERLANDS; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SCOTLAND; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84885467454     PISSN: 17517311     EISSN: 1751732X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S175173111300150X     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aguilar I, Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Wiggans GR and Lawlor TJ 2011. Multiple trait genomic evaluation of conception rate in Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 2621-2624
2. Banos G, Coffey MP, Veerkamp RF, Berry DP and Wall E 2012. Merging and characterising phenotypic data on conventional and rare traits from dairy cattle experimental resources in three countries. Animal 6, 1040-1048
3. Bell MJ, Wall E, Russell G, Simm G and Stott AW 2011. The effect of improving cow productivity, fertility, and longevity on the global warming potential of dairy systems. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 3662-3678
4. Calus MPL 2010. Genomic breeding value prediction: Methods and procedures. Animal 4, 157-164
5. Calus MPL and Veerkamp RF 2011. Accuracy of multi-Trait genomic selection using different methods. Genetics Selection Evolution 43, 26
6. Calus MPL, Mulder HA and Bastiaansen JWM 2011. Identification of Mendelian inconsistencies between SNP and pedigree information of sibs. Genetics Selection Evolution 43, 34
7. Calus MPL, de Haas Y, Pszczola Mand Veerkamp RF 2013. Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle. Animal 7, 183-191
8. Coffey MP, Simm G, Oldham JD, Hill WG and Brotherstone S 2004. Genotype and diet effects on energy balance in the first three lactations of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 4318-4326
9. Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B and Woolliams JA 2008. Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. PLoS One 3, e3395
10. de Haas Y, Calus MPL, Veerkamp RF, Wall E, Coffey MP, Daetwyler HD, Hayes BJ and Pryce JE 2012. Improved accuracy of genomic prediction for dry matter intake of dairy cattle from combined European and Australian data sets. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 6103-6112
11. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR and Thompson R 2009. ASReml user guide release 3.0. VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
12. Goddard M 2009. Genomic selection: Prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 136, 245-257
13. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ and Goddard ME 2009. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 433-443
14. Horan B, Dillon P, Berry DP, O'Connor P and Rath M 2005. The effect of strain of Holstein Friesian, feeding system and parity on lactation curves characteristics of spring-calving dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 95, 231-241
15. Jia Y and Jannink J-L 2012. Multiple trait genomic selection methods increase genetic value prediction accuracy. Genetics 192, 1513-1522
16. Jiménez-Montero JA, Gonzá lez-Recio O and Alenda R 2012. Genotyping strategies for genomic selection in small dairy cattle populations. Animal 6, 1216-1224
17. Johanson JM and Berger PJ 2003. Birth weight as a predictor of calving ease and perinatal mortality in Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 3745-3755
18. Lee SH, Goddard ME, Visscher PM and Van DerWerf JHJ 2010. Using the realized relationship matrix to disentangle confounding factors for the estimation of genetic variance components of complex traits. Genetics Selection Evolution 42, 22
19. Lund M, de Roos A, de Vries A, Druet T, Ducroq V, Fritz S, Guillaume F, Guldbrandtsen B, Liu Z, Reents R, Schrooten C, Seefried F and Su G 2011. A common reference population from four European Holstein populations increases reliability of genomic predictions. Genetics Selection Evolution 43, 43
20. Meuwissen T 2009. Accuracy of breeding values of 'unrelated individuals predicted by dense SNP genotyping. Genetics Selection Evolution 41, 35
21. Meuwissen T, Hayes B and Goddard M 2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819-1829
22. Muir WM 2007. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 124, 342-355
23. Philipsson J, Ral G and Berglund B 1995. Somatic cell count as a selection criterion for mastitis resistance in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 41, 195-200
24. Pryce JE, Nielsen BL, Veerkamp RF and Simm G 1999. Genotype and feeding system effects and interactions for health and fertility traits in dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 57, 193-201
25. Pszczola M, Strabel T, Mulder HA and Calus MPL 2012a. Reliability of genomic selection for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 389-400
26. Pszczola M, Strabel T, van Arendonk JAM and Calus MPL 2012b. The impact of genotyping different groups of animals on accuracy when moving from traditional to genomic selection. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 5412-5421
27. Thompson R and Meyer K 1986. A review of theoretical aspects in the estimation of breeding values for multi-Trait selection. Livestock Production Science 15, 299-313
28. Tsuruta S, Misztal I, Aguilar I and Lawlor TJ 2011. Multiple-Trait genomic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 4198-4204
29. VanRaden PM 2008. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 4414-4423
30. Veerkamp RF 1998. Selection for economic efficiency of dairy cattle using information on live weight and feed intake: A review. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 1109-1119
31. Veerkamp RF, Simm G and Oldham JD 1994. Effects of interaction between genotype and feeding system on milk-production, feed-intake, efficiency and body tissue mobilization in dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 39, 229-241
32. Veerkamp RF, Emmans GC, Cromie AR and Simm G 1995. Variance components for residual feed intake in dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 41, 111-120
33. Veerkamp RF, Oldenbroek JK, Van Der Gaast HJ and Werf JHJVD 2000. Genetic correlation between days until start of luteal activity and milk yield, energy balance, and live weights. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 577-583
34. Veerkamp RF, Mulder HA, Thompson R and Calus MPL 2011. Genomic and pedigree-based genetic parameters for scarcely recorded traits when some animals are genotyped. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 4189-4197
35. Veerkamp RF, Coffey MP, Berry DP, de Haas Y, Strandberg E, Bovenhuis H, Calus MPL and Wall E 2012. Genome-wide associations for feed utilisation complex in primiparous Holstein-Friesian dairy 6 cows from experimental research herds in four European countries. Animal 6, 1738-1749