Metal ion levels from well-functioning birmingham hip resurfacings decline significantly at ten years

Bone and Joint Journal

Volumn 95 B, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1332-1338

  Van Der Straeten, C ^a   Van Quickenborne, D ^b   De Roest, B ^b   Calistri, A ^c   Victor, J ^a   De Smet, K ^b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b ANCA Clinic   (Belgium)

^c Anca Clinic Roma   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM; COBALT; METAL ION;

ACETABULUM; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHROMIUM BLOOD LEVEL; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METAL ON METAL HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; METAL ON METAL JOINT PROSTHESIS; OSTEOLYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; X RAY FILM;

EID: 84885465335     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20494408     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B10.32022     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Eskelinen A, Remes V, Helenius I, et al. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop 2005;76:28-41.
2. Garellick G, Kärrholm J, Rogmark C, Rolfson O, Herberts P. Swedish Hip Registry: Annual Report 2011, page 80. www.shpr.se/Files/ Årsrapport%202011%20(eng)%20webb.pdf (date last accessed 11 June 2013).
3. Quesada MJ, Marker DR, Mont MA. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: Advantages and disadvantages. J Arthroplasty 2008;23:69-73.
4. McMinn D, Daniel J. History and modern concepts in surface replacement. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2006;220:239-251.
5. Langton DJ, Joyce TJ, Jameson SS, et al. Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: The influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011;93-B:164-171.
6. Heisel C, Streich N, Krachler M, Jakubowitz E, Kretzer JP. Characterization of the running-in period in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty: An in vivo and in vitro metal ion analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A:125-133.
7. Lee R, Essner A, Wang A. Tribological considerations in primary and revision metalon- metal arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A(Suppl):118-124.
8. Underwood RJ, Zografos A, Sayles RS, Hart A, Cann P. Edge loading in metalon- metal hips: low clearance is a new risk factor. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2012;226:217-226.
9. Griffin WL, Nanson CJ, Springer BD, Fehring TK. Reduced articular surface of one-piece cups: A cause of runaway wear and early failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:2328-2332.
10. De Smet K, De Haan R, Calistri A, et al. Metal ion measurement as a diagnostic tool to identify problems with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008;90-A(Suppl):202-208.
11. De Smet KA, Van Der Straeten C, Van Orsouw M, et al. Revisions of metal-onmetal hip resurfacing: lessons learned and improved outcome. Orthop Clin N Am 2011;42:259-269.
12. No authors listed. Medical device alert of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency on all metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements. www.mhra.gov.uk/Publications/Safetywarnings/MedicalDeviceAlerts (date last accessed 10 June 2013).
13. No authors listed. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA): FDA 522 guidance document: concerns about metal-on-metal hip implant systems. www.fda.gov/Medical-Devices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/ MetalonMetalHipImplants/ucm241604.htm (date last accessed 11 June 2013).
14. Van Der Straeten C, Grammatopoulos G, Gill HS, et al. The 2012 Otto Aufranc Award: The interpretation of metal ion levels in unilateral and bilateral hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:377-385.
15. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mold arthroplasty: An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1969;51-A:737-755.
16. Charnley J, Halley DK. Rate of wear in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975;112:170-179.
17. Langton DJ, Sprowson AP, Mahadeva D, et al. Cup anteversion post hip resurfacing arthroplasty: validation of EBRA and presentation of a simple clinical grading system. J Arthroplasty 2010;25:607-613.
18. No authors listed. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry: Annual report, 2012. https://aoanjrr.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/ annual-reports-2012(date last accessed 10 June 2013).
19. No authors listed. National Joint Registry for England and Wales 9th annual report, 2012. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk (date last accessed 10 June 2013).
20. Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Kwon YM, et al. Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91- B:1019-1024.
21. Mathew MT, Jacobs JJ, Wimmer MA. Wear-corrosion synergism in a CoCrMo hip bearing alloy is influenced by proteins. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470:3109- 3117.
22. Yan Y, Dowson D, Neville A. In-situ electrochemical study of interaction of tribology and corrosion in artificial hip prosthesis simulators. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2013;18:191-199.
23. Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Dorey FJ, et al. Do ion concentrations after metal-onmetal hip resurfacing increase over time? A prospective study. J Arthroplasty 2013;28:695-700.
24. deSouza RM, Parsons NR, Oni T, et al. Metal ion levels following resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: serial results over a ten-year period. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B:1642-1647.