Percutaneous coronary intervention in nonagenarian: A meta-analysis of observational studies

Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine

Volumn 14, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 773-779

  Presutti, Davide G ^a   D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio ^a,g   Omedè, Pierluigi ^a   Biondi Zoccai, Giuseppe ^e,g   Moretti, Claudio ^a,g   Bollati, Mario ^f   Sciuto, Filippo ^a   Lee, Michael S ^c   Moreno, Raul ^d   Bikkina, Mahesh ^b   Di Cuia, Marco ^a   Resmini, Chiara ^a   Gaita, Fiorenzo ^a   Sheiban, Imad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b ST JOSEPH S REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO LA PAZ   (Spain)

^e SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^f Invasive Cardiology   (Belgium)

^g Meta Analysis and Evidence based Medicine Training in Cardiology   (Italy)

Author keywords

myocardial infarction; nonagenarians; percutaneous coronary intervention

Indexed keywords

CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; CAUSE OF DEATH; CORONARY STENT; HEART DISEASE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; META ANALYSIS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; REVIEW; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY DISEASE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HUMANS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84885386712     PISSN: 15582027     EISSN: 15582035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283619410     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. US Census Bureau: 2006 Population Estimates, General demographic Characteristics. http://www.factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?-lang=en. [Accessed 14 June 2011]
2. Roberts WC, Shirani J. Comparison of cardiac findings at necropsy in octogenarians, nonagenarians, and centenarians. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82:627-631.
3. Skolnick AH, Alexander KP, Chen AY, et al. Characteristics, management, and outcomes of 5,557 patients age > or 90 years with acute coronary syndromes: results from the CRUSADE Initiative. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:1790-1797.
4. Alexander KP, Newby LK, Cannon CP, et al., American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; Society of Geriatric Cardiology. Acute coronary care in the elderly, part I: Non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology. Circulation 2007; 115:2549-2569; Review.
5. Alexander KP, Newby LK, Armstrong PW, et al. American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; Society of Geriatric Cardiology Acute coronary care in the elderly, part II: ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology. Circulation 2007; 115:2570-2589.
6. D'Ascenzo F, Biondi-Zoccai G, Moretti C, et al. TIMI, GRACE and alternative risk scores in Acute Coronary Syndromes: a meta-analysis of 40 derivation studies on 216,552 patients and of 42 validation studies on 31,625 patients. Contemp Clin Trials 2012; 33:507-514.
7. Lee PY, Alexander KP, Hammikk BG et al. Representation of elderly persons and women in published randomized trials of acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 2001; 286:708-713.
8. De Boer MJ, Ottervanger JP, van't Hof AW, et al., Zwolle Myocardial Infarction Study Group. Reperfusion therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomized comparison of primary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39:1723-1728.
9. Dzavik V, Sleeper LA, Cocke TP, et al., SHOCK Investigators. Early revascularization is associated with improved survival in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. Eur Heart J 2003; 24:828-837.
10. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al., PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009; 339:b2535.
11. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 1999; 354:1896-1900.
12. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000; 283:2008-2012.
13. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009. Available from www.cochranehandbook. org. [Accessed 2 January 2011]
14. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measure 1960; 20:622-626.
15. Parikh R, Chennareddy S, Debari V, et al. Percutaneous coronary interventions in nonagenarians: in-hospital mortality and outcome at one year follow-up. Clin Cardiol 2009; 32:E16-21.
16. Wu Y-J, Hou CJ-Y, Chou Y-S, Tsai C-H. Percutaneous coronary intervention in nonagenarians. Acta Cardiol Sin 2004; 20:73-82.
17. Lee MS, Zimmer R, Pessegueiro A, et al. Outcomes of nonagenarians who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 71:526-530.
18. Rekik S, Brunet J, Bayet G, et al. Unprotected left main angioplasty in nonagenarians: clinical characteristics, procedural features and outcome: a case series study. J Invasive Cardiol 2010; 22:231-234.
19. Moreno R, Salazar A, Bañ uelos C, et al. Effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions in nonagenarians. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94:1058-1060.
20. Teplitsky I, Assali A, Lev E, et al. Results of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients > or 90 years of age. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 70:937-943.
21. From AM, Rihal CS, Lennon RJ, et al. Temporal trends and improved outcomes of percutaneous coronary revascularization in nonagenarians. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 1:692-698.
22. Koutouzis M, Grip L, Matejka G, Albertsson P. Primary percutaneous coronary interventions in nonagenarians. Clin Cardiol 2010; 33:157-161.
23. Danzi GB, Centola M, Pomidossi GA, et al. Usefulness of primary angioplasty in nonagenarians with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2010; 106:770-773.
24. Sillano D, Resmini C, Meliga E, et al. A retrospective multicentre observational study of the interventional management of coronary disease in the very elderly: the NINETY (NonagenarIaNs trEated by means of sTents studY). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012; [Epub ahead of print]
25. D'Ascenzo F, Presutti DG, Picardi E, et al. Prevalence and noninvasive predictors of left main or three-vessel coronary disease: evidence from a collaborative international meta-analysis including 22 740 patients. Heart 2012; 98:914-919.
26. Creditor MC. Hazards of hospitalization of the elderly. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118:219-223.
27. Bagshaw SM, Webb SA, Delaney A, et al. Very old patients admitted to intensive care in Australia and New Zealand: a multicentre cohort analysis. Crit Care 2009; 13:R45; 26.
28. Life Tables for the United States Social Security Area 1900-2100 http://www.socialsecurity.gov/OACT/NOTES/pdf-studies/study120.pdf. [Accessed 1 July 2011]
29. Batchelor WB, Anstrom KJ, Muhlbaier LH, et al. Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: results in 7,472 octogenarians. National Cardiovascular Network Collaboration. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36:723-730.
30. Feldman DN, Gade CL, Slotwiner AJ, et al., New York State Angioplasty Registry. Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in patients of three age groups (80 years) (from the New York State Angioplasty Registry). Am J Cardiol 2006; 98:1334-1339.
31. McKellar SH, Brown ML, Frye RL, et al. Comparison of coronary revascularization procedures in octogenarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2008; 5:738-746.
32. Cheng JM, Onuma Y, Piazza N, et al., Interventional Cardiologists of Thoraxcenter. Comparison of five-year outcome of octogenarians undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents (from the RESEARCH and T-SEARCH Registries). Am J Cardiol 2010; 106:1376-1381.
33. Fenning S, Woolcock R, Haga K, et al. Identifying acute coronary syndrome patients approaching end-of-life. PLoS One 2012; 7:e35536.
34. Newby LK. Acute coronary syndromes in the elderly. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2011; 12:220-222.
35. Gharacholou SM, Alexander KP, Chen AY, et al. Implications and reasons for the lack of use of reperfusion therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the CRUSADE initiative. Am Heart J 2010; 159:757-763.
36. Mullany CJ, Darling GE, Pluth JR, et al. Early and late results after isolated coronary artery bypass surgery in 159 patients aged 80 years and older. Circulation 1990; 82 (Suppl IV):IV-229-IV-236.
37. Utley JR, Leyland SA. Coronary artery bypass grafting in the octogenarian. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 101:866-870.
38. Tsai TP, Chaux A, Matloff JM, et al. Ten-year experience of cardiac surgery in patients aged 80 years and over. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 58:445-451.
39. Miller DJ, Samuels LE, Kaufman MS, et al. Coronary artery bypass surgery in nonagenarians. Angiology 1999; 50:613-617.
40. Speziale G, Nasso G, Barattoni MC, et al. Operative and middle-term results of cardiac surgery in nonagenarians: a bridge toward routine practice. Circulation 2010; 121:208-213.
41. Reynen K, Bachmann K. Coronary arteriography in elderly patients: risk, therapeutic consequences and long-term follow-up. Coronary Artery Dis 1997; 8:657-666.
42. Graham MM, Ghali WA, Faris PD, et al., Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) Investigators. Survival after coronary revascularization in the elderly. Circulation 2002; 105:2378.
43. Koutouzis M, Matejka G, Olivecrona G, et al. Radial vs. femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2010; 11:79-83.
44. Summaria F, Romagnoli E, De Luca L, et al. Feasibility and safety of transradial approach and bivalirudin treatment in elderly patients undergoing early invasive strategy for ACS: 'TheOLDER Research Project' preliminary study. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2012; 13:351-352.
45. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2009; 157:132-140.