Simultaneous segmentation of prostatic zones using Active Appearance Models with multiple coupled levelsets

Computer Vision and Image Understanding

Volumn 117, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1051-1060

  Toth, Robert ^a   Ribault, Justin ^b   Gentile, John ^c   Sperling, Dan ^c   Madabhushi, Anant ^d  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MACNEAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c New Jersey Institute of Radiology   (United States)

^d Case Western Reserve University   (United States)

Author keywords

Active Appearance Models; Levelsets; Prostate segmentation

Indexed keywords

IMAGE RECOGNITION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; STATISTICAL METHODS; UROLOGY;

ACTIVE APPEARANCE MODELS; ANATOMICAL LANDMARKS; HIERARCHICAL SEGMENTATION; IMAGE INTENSITIES; LEAVE-ONE-OUT CROSS VALIDATIONS; LEVEL SET; PROSTATE CAPSULES; PROSTATE SEGMENTATION;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 84885369708     PISSN: 10773142     EISSN: 1090235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2012.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. T. Heimann, H. Meinzer, Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: a review, Medical Image Analysis 13 (2009) 543-563.
2. T. Cootes, C. Taylor, A. Lanitis, Multi-resolution search with active shape models, Computer Vision and Image Processing 1 (1994) 610-612.
3. F. Jolesz, A. Nabavi, R. Kikinis, Integration of interventional MRI with computer-assisted surgery, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 13 (2001) 69-77. (Pubitemid 32044562)
4. B. van Ginneken, A. Frangi, J. Staal, B. Romeny, M. Viergever, Active shape model segmentation with optimal features, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 21 (2002) 924-933. (Pubitemid 35476596)
5. R. Larsen, M. Stegmann, S. Darkner, S. Forchhammer, T. Cootes, B. Ersboll, Texture enhanced appearance models, Computer Vision and Image Understanding 106 (2007) 20-30. (Pubitemid 46528758)
6. R. Toth, S. Doyle, M. Rosen, S. Pungavkar, A. Kalyanpur, A. Madabhushi, Weritas: weighted ensemble of regional image textures for asm segmentation, SPIE Medical Imaging 7258 (2009) 725905-725911, http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.812473.
7. T. Cootes, G. Edwards, C. Taylor, Active appearance models, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 23 (2001) 681-685. (Pubitemid 32585279)
8. T. Cootes, C. Taylor, D. Cooper, J. Graham, Active shape models - their training and application, Computer Vision and Image Understanding 61 (1995) 38-59.
9. M.A. Styner, T.R. Kumar, L.P. Nolte, G. Zsemlye, G. Szekely, C.J. Taylor, Rh. H. Davies, Evaluation of 3D correspondence methods for model building, IPMI (2003) 63-75.
10. D. Morris, T. Kanade, Image-consistent surface triangulation, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1 (2000) 1332.
11. M. Leventon, W. Grimson, O. Faugeras, Statisticalshape influence in geodesic active contours, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1 (2000) 316-323.
12. A. Tsai, W. Wells, C. Tempany, E. Grimson, A. Willsky, Mutual information in coupled multi-shape model for medical image segmentation, Medical Image Analysis 8 (2004) 429-445. (Pubitemid 39618469)
13. A. Akhondi-Asl, H. Soltanian-Zadeh, Effect of number of coupled structures on the segmentation of brain structures, Journal of Signal Processing Systems 54 (2009) 215-230.
14. S. Chen, D. Lovelock, R. Radke, Segmenting the prostate and rectun in ct imagery using anatomical constraints, Medical Image Analysis 15 (2011) 1-11.
15. J. Ftterer, J. Barentsz, 3T MRI of prostate cancer, Applied Radiology 38 (2009) 25-32.
16. O. Akin, E. Sala, C. Moskowitz, K. Kuroiwa, N. Ishill, D. Pucar, P. Scardino, H. Hricak, Transition zone prostate cancers: features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging, Radiology 239 (2006) 784-792. (Pubitemid 43830614)
17. A. Erbersdobler, H. Augistin, T. Schlomm, R. Henke, Prostate cancers in the transitionj zone: Part 1. Pathological aspects, BJU International 94 (2004) 1221-1225. (Pubitemid 40052081)
18. H. Augustin, A. Erbersdobler, P. Hammerer, M. Graefen, H. Huland, Prostate cancers in the transition zone: Part 2. Clinical aspects, BJU International 94 (2004) 1226-1229. (Pubitemid 40052082)
19. S. Viswanath, B. Bloch, M. Rosen, J. Chappelow, N. Rofsky, R. Lenkinski, E. Genega, A. Kalyanpur, A. Madabhushi, Integrating structural and functional imaging for computer assisted detection of prostate cancer on multi-protocol in vivo 3 Tesla MRI, SPIE Medical Imaging 7260 (2009).
20. S. Viswanath, B.N. Bloch, J. Chappelow, R. Toth, E. Genega, R. Lenkinski, N. Rofsky, A. Madabhushi, Central gland and peripheral zone prostate tumors have significantly different quantitative imaging signatures on 3 Tesla endorectal, in vivo t2-weighted magnetic resonance imagery, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 36 (1) (2012) 213-224, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.23618.
21. A. Madabhushi, M. Feldman, D. Metaxas, J. Tomasezweski, D. Chute, Automated detection of prostatic adenocarcinoma from high resolution ex vivo MRI, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 24 (2005) 1611-1625. (Pubitemid 41812028)
22. R. Lopes, N. Ayache, N. Makni, Prostate cancer characterization on MR images using fractal features, Medical Physics 38 (2010) 83-95.
23. P. Vos, T. Hambrock, J. Barenstz, H. Huisman, Computer-assisted analysis of peripheral zone prostate lesions using T2-weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced T1-weighted MRI, Physics in Medicine and Biology 55 (2010) 1719.
24. S. Ozer, D. Langer, X. Liu, Supervised and unsupervised methods for prostate cancer segmentation with multispectral MRI, Medical Physics 37 (2010) 1873- 1883.
25. X. Liu, I. Yetik, Automated prostate cancer localization without the need for peripheral zone extraction using multiparametric MRI, Medical Physics 38 (2011) 2986-2994.
26. B. Shannon, J. McNeal, R. Cohen, Transition zone carcinoma of the prostate gland: a common indolent tumour type that occasionally manifests aggressive behaviour, Pathology 35 (2003) 467-471. (Pubitemid 38041280)
27. S. Klein, U. van der Heide, I. Lips, M. van Vulpen, M. Staring, J. Pluim, Automatic segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images by atlas matching using localized mutual information, Medical Physics 35 (2008) 1407-1417. (Pubitemid 351457509)
28. S. Martin, V. Daanen, J. Troccaz, Automated segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images using a probabilistic atlas and a spatially constrained deformable model, Medical Physics 37 (2010) 1579-1590.
29. D. Pasquier, T. Lacornerie, M. Vermandel, J. Rousseau, E. Lartigau, N. Betrouni, Automatic segmentation of pelvic structures from magnetic resonance images for prostate cancer radiotherapy, International Journal of Radiation Oncology and Biological Physics 68 (2007) 592-600. (Pubitemid 46711150)
30. N. Makni, P. Puech, R. Lopes, A. Dewalle, Combining a deformable model and a probabilistic framework for an automatic 3D segmentation of prostate on MRI, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 4 (2009) 181-188.
31. R. Toth, B. Bloch, E. Genega, N. Rofsky, R. Lenkinski, M. Rosen, A. Madabhushi, Accurate prostate volume estimation using active shape models on T2- weighted MRI, Academic Radiology 18 (2011) 745-754.
32. J.C. Bulman, R. Toth, A.D. Patel, B.N. Bloch, C.J. McMahon, L. Ngo, A. Madabhushi, N.M. Rofsky, Automated computer-derived prostate volumes from MRI data: Comparison to radiologist-derived mri volumes and pathology specimen volumes, Radiology 262 (2012) 144-151, http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol. 11110266.
33. N. Makni, A. Iancu, P. Puech, O. Colot, S. Mordon, N. Betrouni, Zonal segmentation of prostate using multispectral magnetic resonance images, Medical Physics 38 (2011) 6093-6105.
34. R. Toth, A. Madabhushi, Multi-feature landmark free active appearance models: application to prostate MRI segmentation, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 38 (2012) 1638-1650.
35. A. Albert, Regression and the Moore-Penrose Pseudoinverse, Academic Press, 1972.
36. M. Wachowiak, R. Smolikova, Y. Zheng, J. Zurada, A. Elmaghraby, An approach to multimodal biomedical image registration utilizing particle swarm optimization, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computing 8 (2004) 289-301.
37. M. Powell, An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives, The Computer Journal 7 (1964) 155-162.
38. S. Pieper, B. Lorensen, W. Schroeder, R. Kikinis, The na-mic kit: Itk, vtk, pipelines, grids and 3D slicer as an open platform for the medical image computing community, in: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, pp. 698-701.
39. S. Pieper, M. Halle, R. Kikinis, 3D slicer, in: Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, pp. 632-635.
40. D. Gering, A. Nabavi, R. Kikinis, W. Grimsom, N. Hata, P. Everett, F. Jolesz, W. Wells, An integrated visualization system for surgical planning and guidance using image fusion and interventional imaging, in: MICCAI, vol. 2, pp. 809- 819.
41. M. Cohen, R. Dubois, M. Zeineh, Rapid and effective correction of rf inhomogeneity for high field magnetic resonance imaging, Human Brain Mapping 10 (2000) 204211.
42. T. Yoo, M. Ackerman, W. Lorensen, W. Schroeder, A.S.V. Chalana, D. Metaxas, R. Whitaker, Engineering and algorithm design for an image processing api: a technical report on itk - the insight toolkit, in: E. Westwood (Ed.), Proc. of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2002.