Hybridization leads to interspecific gene flow in sarracenia (Sarraceniaceae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 100, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 2085-2091

  Steven Furches, M ^a   Small, Randall L ^b   Furches, Anna ^a  

^a LINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Conservation genetics; Endangered plants; Genetic swamping; Hybridization; Microsatellites; Pitcher plants; Sarracenia; Sarraceniaceae

Indexed keywords

ABANDONED MINE; ALLOPATRY; CONSERVATION GENETICS; ENDANGERED SPECIES; GENE FLOW; GENETIC MARKER; HYBRID; HYBRIDIZATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SYMPATRY;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CONSERVATION GENETICS; ENDANGERED PLANTS; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SWAMPING; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION; MICROSATELLITES; PITCHER PLANTS; POPULATION GENETICS; SARRACENIA; SARRACENIACEAE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

CONSERVATION GENETICS; ENDANGERED PLANTS; GENETIC SWAMPING; HYBRIDIZATION; MICROSATELLITES; PITCHER PLANTS; SARRACENIA; SARRACENIACEAE;

ALLELES; GENE FLOW; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; SARRACENIACEAE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84885332904     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1300038     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. ARNOLD, M. 2006. Evolution through genetic change. Oxford University Press. New York, New York, USA.
2. BAYER, R. J., L. HUFFORD, and D. E. SOLTIS. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships in Sarraceniaceae based on rbcL and ITS sequences. Systematic Botany 21: 121-134.
3. BELL, C. 1952. Natural hybrids of the genus Sarracenia. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 68: 55-80.
4. BELL, C., and F. CASE. 1956. Natural hybrids of the genus Sarracenia II: Notes on distribution. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 72: 142-152.
5. BURGARELLA, C., ET AL. 2009. Detection of hybrids in nature: Application to oaks (Quercus suber and Q. ilex). Heredity 102: 442-452.
6. CARNEY, S. E., M. B. CRUZAN, and M. L. ARNOLD. 1994. Reproductive interactions between hybridizing irises: Analyses of pollen-tube growth and fertilization success. American Journal of Botany 81: 1169-1175.
7. CRUZAN, M. B., and M. L. ARNOLD. 1994. Assortative mating and natural selection in an Iris hybrid zone. Evolution 48: 1946-1958.
8. D'Amato, P. 1998. The savage garden. Ten Speed Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
9. EMELIANOV, I., F. MAREC, and J. MALLET. 2004. Genomic evidence for divergence with gene fl ow in host races of the larch budmoth. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, Biological Sciences 271: 97-105.
10. FOLKERTS, G. W. 1982. The Gulf Coast pitcher plant bogs. American Scientist 70: 260-267.
11. HARPER, R. 1918. The American pitcher plants. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 34: 110-125.
12. KOOPMAN, M., E. GALLAGHER, and B. CARSTENS. 2009. Isolation and characterization of nine microsatellite loci in the pale pitcher plant, Sarracenia alata (Sarraceniaceae). Molecular Ecology Resources 9: 1460-1466.
13. LEPAIS, O., PETIT RJ, GUICHOUX E, ET AL. 2009. Species relative abundance and direction of introgression in oaks. Molecular Ecology 18: 2228-2242.
14. MALLET, J. 2007. Hybrid speciation. Nature 446: 279-283.
15. MANDOSSIAN, A. 1965. Some aspects of the ecological life history of Sarracenia purpurea. Ph.D. dissertation. Michigan State University. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
16. MASTERS, M. 1881. Sarracenias. Gardeners' Chronicle 16: 40-41.
17. MAYR, E. 1992. A local fl ora and the biological species concept. American Journal of Botany 79: 222-238.
18. MAYR, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
19. MCDANIEL, S. 1971. The genus Sarracenia (Sarraceniaceae). Bulletin of the Tall Timbers Research Station 9: 1-36.
20. MINDER, A. M., and A. WIDMER. 2008. A population genomic analysis of species boundaries: Neutral processes, adaptive divergence and introgression between two hybridizing plant species. Molecular Ecology 17: 1552-1563.
21. MOORE, D. 1874. On a hybrid Sarracenia. Gardeners' Chronicle 1: 702.
22. MORAN, E. V., J. WILLIS, and J. S. CLARK. 2011. Genetic evidence for hybridization in red oaks (Quercus sect. Lobatae, Fagaceae). American Journal of Botany 99: 92-100.
23. NEYLAND, R., and M. MERCHANT. 2006. Systematic relationships of Sarraceniaceae inferred from ribosomal DNA sequences. Madroño 53: 223-232.
24. PRITCHARD, J. K., M. STEPHENS, and P. DONNELLY. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
25. RIESEBERG, L. H. 1991. Homoploid reticulate evolution in Helianthus (Asteraceae): Evidence from ribosomal genes. American Journal of Botany 78: 1218-1237.
26. ROGERS, W. L., J. M. Cruse-Sanders, R. DETERMANN, and R. L. MALMBERG. 2010. Development and characterization of microsatellite markers in Sarracenia L. (pitcher plant) species. Conservation Genetics Resources 2: 75-79.
27. RUSSELL, A. 1918. The macroscopic and microscopic structure of some hybrid sarracenias compared with their parents. Contributions from the Botanical Laboratory of the University of Pennsylvania 5: 3-41.
28. SCHNELL, D. 1983. Notes on the pollination of Sarracenia fl ava (Sarraceniaceae) in the piedmont province of North Carolina. Rhodora 85: 405-420.
29. SCHNELL, D. 1998. A pitcher key to the genus Sarracenia L. (Sarraceniaceae). Castanea 63: 489-492.
30. SCHNELL, D. 2002. Carnivorous plants of the United States and Canada. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA.
31. SCHNELL, D., and D. KRIDER. 1976. Cluster analysis of the genus Sarracenia L. in the southeastern United States. Castanea 41: 165-176.
32. SCHUELKE, M. 2000. An economic method for the fl uorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nature Biotechnology 18: 233-234.
33. SEEHAUSEN, O., J. J. M. Van Alphen, and F. WITTE. 1997. Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science 277: 1808-1811.
34. U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE. 1990. Mountain sweet pitcher plant recovery plan. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Atlanta, Georgia, USAAtlanta, Georgia.
35. U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE. 1992. Alabama canebreak pitcher plant recovery plan. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
36. U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE. 1994. Green pitcher plant recovery plan. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Atlanta, Georgia, USA Atlanta, Georgia.
37. UTHICKE, S., S. PURCELL, and B. BLOCKMANS. 2005. Natural hybridization does not dissolve species boundaries in commercially important sea cucumbers. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London 85: 261-270.
38. WIRTZ, P. 1999. Mother species-father species: Unidirectional hybridization in animals with female choice. Animal Behaviour 58: 1-12.
39. WU, C. 2001. The genic view of the process of speciation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14: 851-865.