Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative angiographic and intravascular ultrasound parameters predicting the functional significance of single de novo lesions

International Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 168, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 1364-1369

  Chen, Shao Liang ^a   Xu, Bo ^b   Chen, Jack B ^c   Xu, Tian ^a   Ye, Fei ^a   Zhang, Jun Jie ^a   Kwan, Tak W ^d   Tian, Nai Liang ^a   Liu, Zhi Zhong ^a   Lin, Song ^a  

^a NANJING MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Fuwai Heart Hospital and Cardiovascular Institute   (China)

^c Saint Joseph's Heart and Vascular Institute   (United States)

^d BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Diagnostic value; Fractional flow reserve; Intravascular ultrasound; Quantitative coronary analysis; Receiver operator curve

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HUMAN; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REGISTER; SINGLE CORONARY ARTERY LESION; ULTRASOUND SCANNER; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS;

DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; QUANTITATIVE CORONARY ANALYSIS; RECEIVER OPERATOR CURVE;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGISTRIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 84885311703     PISSN: 01675273     EISSN: 18741754     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.010     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Tobis J, Azarbal B, Slavin L. Assessment of Intermediate severity coronary lesions In the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:839-48.
2. Topol EJ, Nissen SE. Our preoccupation with coronary luminology: the dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings In Ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1995;92:2333-42.
3. Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Mehran R, et al. Long-term follow-up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was not performed based on Intravascular ultrasound findings: Importance of lumen dimensions. Circulation 1999;100: 256-61.
4. Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De BB, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses In the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography In multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:2816-21.
5. Takagi A, Tsurumi Y, Ishii Y, et al. Clinical potential of Intravascular ultrasound for Physiological assessment of coronary stenosis: relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. Circulation 1999;100:250-5.
6. Briguori C, Anzuini A, Airoldi F, et al. Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of Intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 2001;87:136-41.
7. Jasti V, Ivan E, Yalamanchili V, Wongpraparut N, Leesar MA. Correlations between fractional flow reserve and Intravascular ultrasound In patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation 2004;110:2831-6.
8. Lee CH, Tai BC, Soon CY, et al. New set of Intravascular ultrasound-derived anatomic criteria for defining functionally significant stenoses In small coronary arteries (results from Intravascular Ultrasound Diagnostic Evaluation of Atherosclerosis In Singapore [iDEAS] study). Am J Cardiol 2010;105:1378-84.
9. Melikian N, De Bondt P, Tonino P, et al. Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion Imaging In patients with angiographic multivessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2010;3:307-14.
10. Abizaid A, Mintz GS, Pichard AD, et al. Clinical, Intravascular ultrasound, and quantitative angiographic determinants of the coronary flow reserve before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1998;82: 423-8.
11. Koo BK, Yang HM, Doh JH, et al. Optimal Intravascular ultrasound criteria and their accuracy for defining the functional significance of Intermediate coronary stenoses of different locations. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2011;4:803-11.
12. Kang SJ, Lee JY, Ahn JM, et al. Validation of Intravascular ultrasound-derived parameters with fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary stenosis severity. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:65-71.
13. Fischer JJ, Samady H, McPherson JA, et al. Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity. Am J Cardiol 2001;90:210-5.
14. Li J. Assessing the dependence of sensitivity and specificity on prevalence In meta-analysis. Biostatistics 2011;12:710-22.
15. Leeflang MMG, Bossuyt PMM, Irwig L. Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: Implications for evidence-based diagnosis. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62(1):5-12.
16. Pijls NHJ, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996;334: 1703-8.
17. White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB, et al. Does visual Interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the Physiologic Importance of a coronary stenosis? N Engl J Med N Engl J Med 1984;310:819-24.
18. Kamide K, Rakugi H, Higaki J, et al. The renin-angiotensin and adrenergic nervous system In cardiac hypertrophy In fructose-fed rats. Am J Hypertens 2002 Jan;15(1):66-71.
19. Sahinarslan A, Kocaman SA, Olgun H, et al. The reliability of fractional flow reserve measurement In patients with diabetes mellitus. Coron Artery Dis 2009;20(5): 317-21.
20. De Bruyne B, Bartunek J, Sys SU, et al. Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements In humans: feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope Index, and fractional flow reserve. Circulation 1996;94:1842-9.
21. Pijls NHL, De Bruyne B. Coronary pressure measurement and fractional flow reserve. Heart 1998;80:539-42.
22. Siebes M, Steven AJ, Chamuleau M, et al. Influences of hemodynamic conditions on fractional flow reserve: parametric analysis of underlying models. Am J Physiol 2002;283:H1462-670.
23. Pijls NHL, De Bruyne B. Coronary pressure. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000. p. 254.