Comparability of methods assigning monetary costs to diets: Derivation from household till receipts versus cost database estimation using 4-day food diaries

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Volumn 67, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1072-1076

  Timmins, K A ^a   Morris, M A ^a   Hulme, C ^b   Edwards, K L ^c   Clarke, G P ^a   Cade, J E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

diet; epidemiologic methods; food prices; monetary costs; nutrition assessment

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CALORIC INTAKE; CHILD; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; COST; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; DIET COST; DIETARY INTAKE; FEMALE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; FOOD COMPOSITION; FOOD COST DATABASE; FOOD RECEIPT DATABASE; HOUSEHOLD; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIMIT OF AGREEMENT; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SCHOOL CHILD; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADULT; CHILD; COMMERCE; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DIET; DIET RECORDS; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; FOOD; FOOD HABITS; HUMANS; MALE; NUTRITIVE VALUE;

EID: 84885301841     PISSN: 09543007     EISSN: 14765640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2013.157     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Key T, Allen N, Spencer E, Travis R. The effect of diet on risk of cancer. Lancet 2002; 360: 861-868. (Pubitemid 35257961)
2. Foresight. Tackling Obesities: Future Choices-Project report. In: Government Office for Science 2007.
3. Department of Health, Food Standards Agency. National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Headline results from Years 1, 2 and 3 (combined) of the Rolling Programme (2008/2009-2010/11) 2012.
4. Cade J, Upmeier H, Calvert C, Greenwood D. Costs of a healthy diet: analysis from the UK Women's Cohort Study. Pub Health Nutr 1999; 2: 505-512. (Pubitemid 30002865)
5. Darmon N, Briend A, Drewnowski A. Energy-dense diets are associated with lower diet costs: a community study of French adults. Pub Health Nutr 2004; 7: 21-27. (Pubitemid 38294524)
6. Maillot M, Darmon N, Vieux F, Drewnowski A. Low energy density and high nutritional quality are each associated with higher diet costs in French adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2007; 86: 690-696. (Pubitemid 47435836)
7. Defra. Family Food: A report on the 2009 Family Food Module of the Living Costs and Food Survey. The Office for National Statistics: Defra, 2009.
8. Turrell G, Kavanagh A. Socio-economic pathways to diet: modelling the association between socio-economic position and food purchasing behaviour. Pub Health Nutr 2005; 9: 375-383. (Pubitemid 43845071)
9. Sun B. Promotion Effect on Endogenous Consumption. Market Sci 2005; 24: 430-443. (Pubitemid 41409335)
10. Ryden P, Hagfors L. Diet cost, diet quality and socio-economic position: how are they related and what contributes to differences in diet costs? Pub Health Nutr 2011; 24: 1-13.
11. Waterlander WE, de Haas WE, van Amstel I, Schuit AJ, Twisk JWR, Visser M et al. Energy density, energy costs and income-how are they related? Pub Health Nutr 2010; 13: 1599-1608.
12. Murakami K, Sasaki S, Takahashi Y, Okubo H, Hirota N, Notsu A et al. Comparability of weighed dietary records and a self-administered diet history questionnaire for estimating monetary cost of dietary energy. Environ health insights 2008; 1: 35-43.
13. Aaron GJ, Keim NL, Drewnowski A, Townsend MS. Estimating dietary costs of low-income women in California: a comparison of 2 approaches. Am J Clin Nutr 2013; 97: 835-841.
14. Ransley JK, Donnelly JK, Botham H, Khara TN, Greenwood DC, Cade JE. Use of supermarket receipts to estimate energy and fat content of food purchased by lean and overweight families. Appetite 2003; 41: 141-148. (Pubitemid 37188743)
15. Ransley JK. An investigation into the use of supermarket receipts as a new method of estimating fat and energy in the household diet. phd. University of Leeds: UK, 2002.
16. Defra. Household Food and Drink Waste linked to Food and Drink Purchases. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, 2010.
17. Holland B, Welch AA, Unwin ID, Buss DH, Paul AA, Southgate DAT. McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. 5th (edn) Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, 1991.
18. Office for National Statistics. National Food Survey: 2000. The Stationery Office: London, 2011.
19. Food Standards Agency. Food Portion Sizes. The Stationary Office: London, 1998.
20. Office for National Statistics. Consumer Price Indices 2011. The Stationery Office: London, 2011.
21. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 11. In: College Station TSL, (ed). 2009.
22. Monsivais P, McLain J, Drewnowski A. The rising disparity in the price of healthful foods: 2004-2008. Food Policy 2010; 35: 514-520.
23. Monsivais P, Perrigue MM, Adams SL, Drewnowski A. Measuring diet cost at the individual level: a comparison of three methods. Eur J Clin Nutr 2013 (in press).
24. Freedman LS, Schatzkin A, Midthune D, Kipnis V. Dealing with dietary measurement error in nutritional cohort studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011; 103: 1086-1092.
25. Aggarwal A, Monsivais P, Cook AJ, Drewnowski A. Does diet cost mediate the relation between socioeconomic position and diet quality? Eur J Clin Nutr 2011; 65: 1059-1066.
26. Wrigley N, Warm D, Margetts B, Whelan A. Assessing the impact of improved retail access on diet in a 'food desert': a preliminary report. Urban Stud 2002; 39: 2061-2082.
27. Jiao J, Moudon AV, Ulmer J, Hurvitz PM, Drewnowski A. How to identify food deserts: measuring physical and economic access to supermarkets in King County, Washington. Am J Pub Health 2012; 102: e32-e39.
28. Beatty TKM. Do the Poor Pay More for Food?: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Am J Agri Econ 2010; 92: 608-621.