Collaborative planning in the network: Consensus seeking in urban planning issues on the Internet-the case of China

Planning Theory

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 351-368

  Cheng, Yao ^a  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Chinese Internet based participation; collaborative planning; consensus seeking; social learning

Indexed keywords

INTERNET; LEARNING; PLANNING THEORY; URBAN PLANNING;

CHINA; CHONGQING; FUJIAN; XIAMEN;

EID: 84885230514     PISSN: 14730952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473095213499655     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Arnstein S.A ladder of citizen participation.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1969;35 (4): 216-224.
2. Bäcklund P.Agonism and institutional ambiguity: Ideas on democracy and the role of participation in the development of planning theory and practice.Planning Theory. 2010;9 (4): 333-350.
3. Brabham D.Crowdsourcing the public participation process of planning projects.Planning Theory. 2009;8 (3): 242-262.
4. Budthimedhee K,Li J,George V.ePlanning: A snapshot of the literature on using the world wide web in urban planning.Journal of Planning Literature. 2002;17 (2): 227-244.
5. The 28th Statistical Report on Internet Development in China. Beijing: CNNIC; 2011:.
6. The 9th Statistical Report on Internet Development in China. Beijing: CNNIC; 2002:.
7. Dryzek JDiscursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990:.
8. Du JThe Internet Crisis for Government. Beijing, China: China Development Press; 2011:.
9. Ferber P,Foltz F,Pugliese R.The Internet and public participation: State legislature web sites and the many definitions of interactivity.Bulletin of Science Technology & Society. 2005;25:85-93.
10. Flyvbjerg BCities for Citizens: Planning and the Rise of Civil Society in a Global Age. Douglass MFriedmann J, ed. Chichester, England; New York: J. Wiley; 1998:185-211.
11. Forester JPlanning in the Face of Power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1989:.
12. Forester JConsensus Building Handbook. Lawrence SSara MJennifer T, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1999a:463-494.
13. Forester JThe Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999b:.
14. Friedmann JRetracking America: A Theory of Transactive Planning. New York: Anchor Press; 1973:.
15. Fulton WReaching Consensus in Land-Use Negotiations. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association; 1989:.
16. GangQ (2012) China's malformed media sphere. China Media Project, 11July. Available at: http://cmp.hku.hk/2012/07/11/25293/.
17. Giddens AThe Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1984:.
18. Habermas J RThe Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. London: Heinemann; 1984:.
19. Healey P.Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory.Town Planning Review. 1992;63 (2): 143-162.
20. Healey PCollaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan; 1997:.
21. Healey P.Collaborative planning in perspective.Planning Theory. 2003;2 (2): 101-123.
22. Innes J.Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1995;14 (4): 183-189.
23. Innes J.Planning through consensus building: A new view of the comprehensive planning ideal.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1996;62 (4): 460-472.
24. Innes J.Consensus building: Clarifications for the critics.Planning Theory. 2004;3 (1): 5-20.
25. Innes J,Booher D.Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1999;65 (4): 412-423.
26. Lowry M.Online public deliberation for a regional transportation improvement decision.Transportation. 2010;37 (1): 39-58.
27. Margerum R.Collaborative planning: Building consensus and building a distinct model for practice.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2002;21 (3): 237-253.
28. Mouffe C.Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism.Social Research. 1999;66 (3): 745-758.
29. Mouffe COn the Political. London; New York: Routledge; 2005:.
30. Smitten S.Political potential and capabilities of online communities.German Policy Studies. 2008;4 (4): 33-62.
31. Stanley W,Weare C.The effects of Internet use on political participation: Evidence from an agency online discussion forum.Administration and Society. 2004;36 (5): 503-527.
32. Sunstein CRRepublic. Com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2001:.
33. Taylor NUrban Planning Theory since 1945. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1998:.
34. Tewdwr MPlanning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory. Allmendinger PTewdwr M, ed. London; New York: Routledge; 2002:65-92.
35. Walsh L.A case study of public servants engaged in E-consultation in Australia.International Journal of Electronic Government Research. 2007;3 (4): 20-37.