An informed view on consent for ubicomp

UbiComp 2013 - Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 529-538

  Luger, Ewa ^a   Rodden, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Consent; Design; Privacy; Ubicomp

Indexed keywords

CONSENT; DESIGN PRINCIPLES; HUMAN ATTENTION; HUMAN LIVES; SYSTEM FUNCTIONALITY; UBICOMP; UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING SYSTEMS; VALUE JUDGEMENT;

DATA PRIVACY; EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; INTELLIGENT BUILDINGS; UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING;

DESIGN;

EID: 84885227348     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2493432.2493446     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Attride-Stirling, J. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research. 1, 3 (2001) 385-405.
2. Bakos, Y., Marotta-Wurgler, F. and Trossen, D. R. Does Anyone Read the Fine Print? Testing a Law and Economics Approach to Standard Form Contracts, New York University Law and Economics Working Papers. Paper 195 (2009).
3. Bonnici, C. J. and Coles-Kemp, L. Principled Electronic Consent Management: A Research Framework, in Proc. 2010 International Conference on Emerging Security Technologies. IEEE, (2010) 119-123.
4. Carey, R. and Burkell, J. A heuristics approach to understanding privacy-protecting behaviors in digital social environments. In Kerr, I., Steeves, V., and Lucock, C. [eds]. Lessons from the Identity Trail, Oxford University Press, 2009. 65-82.
5. Corrigan, O. Empty Ethics: the Problem with Informed Consent. Sociol Health Ill. 25, 7 (2003).
6. Curren, L. and Kaye, J., Revoking Consent: A 'blind spot' in data protection law? Computer Law & Security Review, 26 (2010) 273-283.
7. Dexter, L. Elite and Specialized Interviewing, ECPR Press, 2006.
8. Dritsas, S., Gritzalis, D. and & Lambrinoudakis, S Protecting privacy and anonymity in pervasive computing: trends and perspectives TELE. 23 (2006).
9. Envisioning Cards - http://www.envisioningcards.com.
10. European Commission. Proposed Data Protection Regulation: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/document/review2012/com-2012-11-en. pdf.
11. Faden, R., and Beauchamp, T. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. Oxford University Press, 1986.
12. Friedman, B., Smith, I., Kahn, P., Consolvo S., Selawski, J. Development of a Privacy Addendum for Open Source Licenses: Value Sensitive Design in Industry. In Proc. UBICOMP 2006, ACM Press (2006) 194-211.
13. Friedman, B., Lin, P., Miller, J. K. Informed Consent by Design, in: Cranor, L. F. and Garfinkel, S. (Eds.) Security and Usability, O'Reilly Media Inc, (2005). 503-529.
14. Hillman, R. A. On-line Consumer Standard-Form Contracting Practices: A Survey and Discussion of Legal Implications, Cornell Legal Studies, Paper 05-012 (2005).
15. ICO. Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations: Guidance on the rules on use of cookies and similar technologies. ICO (2012).
16. Jong-yi, H., Suh, E. and Kim, S. Context-aware systems: A literature review and classification, Expert Syst Appl. 36 (2009) 8509-8522.
17. Kay, M. and Terry, M. 2010. Textured agreements: re-envisioning electronic consent. In Proc. SOUPS '10, ACM Press (2010).
18. Lawson, P., & O'Donoghue, M. Approaches to Consent in Canadian Data Protection Law. In Kerr, I., Steeves, V., and Lucock, C. [eds]. Lessons from the Identity Trail, Oxford University Press, 2009. 24-42.
19. Luger, E and Rodden, T. Terms of Agreement: Rethinking Consent for Pervasive Computing. Interact Comput. 25, 2 (2013).
20. Luger, E., Moran, S., & Rodden, T. Consent for All: Revealing the Hidden Complexity of Terms and Conditions. Proc CHI 2013. ACM Press, (2013).
21. Manson, N. C. and O'Neill, O. Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
22. Nissenbaum, H. Privacy in Context: Technology. Policy and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford University Press, 2010.
23. O'Neill, O. Some limits of informed consent, J Med Ethics, 29 (2003), 4-7.
24. Palen, L., Dourish, P. Unpacking Privacy for a Networked World. Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003).
25. Price, S. The Complete A-Z Media and Communication Handbook, Hodder & Stoughton, 1997.
26. Plaut, V., and Bartlett, R. Blind Consent? A Social Psychological Investigation of Non-Readership of Click-Through Agreements. Law Human Behav. 31, 1 (2007).
27. Pöhls, H. C. Verifiable and Revocable Expression of Consent to Processing of Aggregated Personal Data. In Proc. ICICS (2008) 279 - 293.
28. Schneier, B. Google and Facebook's Privacy Illusion. Forbes (2010).
29. Schwartz, P. Internet Privacy and the State. Conn. L. Rev. 32, 820 (2000).
30. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., and MacGregor, D. Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality, Risk Analysis. 24, 2 (2004).
31. Soppera, A, Burbridge, T. Maintaining Privacy in Pervasive Computing - Enabling Acceptance of Sensor-based Services. BT Technology Journal. 22, 3 (2004). 106-118.
32. Steeves, V. Reclaiming the Social Value of Privacy. In Kerr, I., Steeves, V., Lucock, C. [eds]. Lessons from the Identity Trail. Oxford University Press, 2009. 191-208.
33. VOME - http://www.vome.org.uk/.
34. Whitley, E. Informational Privacy, Consent and the "Control" of Personal Data. Information Security Technical Report. 14, 3 (2009). 154-159.