Alvarado score: A guide to computed tomography utilization in appendicitis

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Volumn 83, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 748-752

  Tan, Winson Jianhong ^a   Pek, Wansze ^a   Kabir, Tousif ^a   Goh, Yaw Chong ^a   Chan, Weng Hoong ^a   Wong, Wai Keong ^a   Ong, Hock Soo ^a  

^a SINGAPORE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Appendicitis; General surgery

Indexed keywords

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; ALGORITHM; APPENDECTOMY; APPENDICITIS; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS; UNNECESSARY PROCEDURE;

APPENDICITIS; GENERAL SURGERY;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; APPENDECTOMY; APPENDICITIS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; UNNECESSARY PROCEDURES;

EID: 84885191155     PISSN: 14451433     EISSN: 14452197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ans.12076     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology 2000; 215: 337-348.
2. Rothrock SG, Pagane J. Acute appendicitis in children: emergency department diagnosis and management. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2000; 36: 39-51.
3. Konstantinidis KM, Anastasakou KA, Vorias MN, Sambalis GH, Georgiou MK, Xiarchos AG. A decade of laparoscopic appendectomy: presentation of 1, 026 patients with suspected appendicitis treated in a single surgical department. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A 2008; 18: 248-258.
4. Ming PC, Yan TY, Tat LH. Risk factors of postoperative infections in adults with complicated appendicitis. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech. 2009; 19: 244-248.
5. Leung TT, Dixon E, Gill M etal. Bowel obstruction following appendectomy: what is the true incidence? Ann. Surg. 2009; 250: 51-53.
6. Parker MC, Ellis H, Moran BJ etal. Postoperative adhesions: ten-year follow-up of 12, 584 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. Dis. Colon Rectum 2001; 44: 822-829; discussion 9-30.
7. Yildirim E, Karagulle E, Kirbas I etal. Alvarado scores and pain onset in relation to multislice CT findings in acute appendicitis. Diagn. Interv. Radiol. 2008; 14: 14-18.
8. Hong JJ, Cohn SM, Ekeh AP etal. A prospective randomized study of clinical assessment versus computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Surg. Infect. (Larchmt) 2003; 4: 231-239.
9. Jones K, Pena AA, Dunn EL, Nadalo L, Mangram AJ. Are negative appendectomies still acceptable? Am. J. Surg. 2004; 188: 748-754.
10. Smink DS, Finkelstein JA, Garcia Pena BM, Shannon MW, Taylor GA, Fishman SJ. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children using a clinical practice guideline. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2004; 39: 458-463; discussion 63.
11. Jacobs JE, Birnbaum BA, Macari M etal. Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material. Radiology 2001; 220: 683-690.
12. Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD, Jeffrey RB Jr, Mindelzun RE, Katz DS. Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology 1999; 213: 341-346.
13. Malone AJ Jr, Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melliere BF. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1993; 160: 763-766.
14. Raman SS, Lu DS, Kadell BM, Vodopich DJ, Sayre J, Cryer H. Accuracy of nonfocused helical CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 5-year review. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2002; 178: 1319-1325.
15. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA etal. Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. Radiology 1997; 202: 139-144.
16. Berrington de Gonzalez A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 2004; 363: 345-351.
17. Kosloske AM, Love CL, Rohrer JE, Goldthorn JF, Lacey SR. The diagnosis of appendicitis in children: outcomes of a strategy based on pediatric surgical evaluation. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 29-34.
18. York D, Smith A, Phillips JD, von Allmen D. The influence of advanced radiographic imaging on the treatment of pediatric appendicitis. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2005; 40: 1908-1911.
19. Paulson EK, Kalady MF, Pappas TN. Clinical practice. Suspected appendicitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003; 348: 236-242.
20. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998; 338: 141-146.
21. Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1986; 15: 557-564.
22. Dingemann J, Ure B. Imaging and the use of scores for the diagnosis of appendicitis in children. Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2012; 22: 195-200.
23. Senocak R, Mentes O. Diagnosing appendicitis at different time points in children with right lower quadrant pain: comparison between pediatric appendicitis score and the Alvarado score. World J. Surg. 2012; 36: 216-221.
24. Ohle R, O'Reilly F, O'Brien KK, Fahey T, Dimitrov BD. The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review. BMC Med. 2011; 9: 139.
25. Macklin CP, Radcliffe GS, Merei JM, Stringer MD. A prospective evaluation of the modified Alvarado score for acute appendicitis in children. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1997; 79: 203-205.
26. Ohmann C, Yang Q, Franke C. Diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis. Abdominal Pain Study Group. Eur. J. Surg. 1995; 161: 273-281.
27. Tobias M, Samuel E. Ultrasound and the Alvarado score. J. R. Soc. Med. 1992; 85: 585-586.
28. McKay R, Shepherd J. The use of the clinical scoring system by Alvarado in the decision to perform computed tomography for acute appendicitis in the ED. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2007; 25: 489-493.
29. Rezak A, Abbas HM, Ajemian MS, Dudrick SJ, Kwasnik EM. Decreased use of computed tomography with a modified clinical scoring system in diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis. Arch. Surg. 2011; 146: 64-67.
30. Balthazar EJ, Rofsky NM, Zucker R. Appendicitis: the impact of computed tomography imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1998; 93: 768-771.
31. Lee SL, Walsh AJ, Ho HS. Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch. Surg. 2001; 136: 556-562.
32. Stroman DL, Bayouth CV, Kuhn JA etal. The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am. J. Surg. 1999; 178: 485-489.
33. Mandeville K, Pottker T, Bulloch B, Liu J. Using appendicitis scores in the pediatric ED. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2011; 29: 972-977.
34. Lopez PP, Cohn SM, Popkin CA, Jackowski J, Michalek JE. The use of a computed tomography scan to rule out appendicitis in women of childbearing age is as accurate as clinical examination: a prospective randomized trial. Am. Surg. 2007; 73: 1232-1236.
35. Neff LP, Ladd MR, Becher RD, Jordanhazy RA, Gallaher JR, Pranikoff T. Computerized tomography utilization in children with appendicitis-differences in referring and children's hospitals. Am. Surg. 2011; 77: 1061-1065.