Health system goals: A discrete choice experiment to obtain societal valuations

Health Policy

Volumn 112, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 28-34

  Franken, Margreet ^a   Koolman, Xander ^b  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Discrete choice experiment; Health policy; Health system goals; Health system performance; International comparison; Valuation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GOAL ATTAINMENT; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; LIFE EXPECTANCY; NETHERLANDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; POVERTY; SOCIAL JUSTICE; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; ORGANIZATION; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; INTERNATIONALITY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NETHERLANDS; ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 84885184255     PISSN: 01688510     EISSN: 18726054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2000 - Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
2. Ratcliffe J., Buxton M. Patients' preferences regarding the process and outcomes of life-saving technology. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 1999, 15:340-351.
3. Tyler T.R. Process utility and help seeking: what do people want from experts?. Journal of economic psychology 2006, 27:360-376.
4. van Empel I.W.H., Dancet E.A.F., Koolman X.H.E., Nelen W.L.D.M., Stolk E.A., Sermeus W., et al. Physicians underestimate the importance of patient-centredness to patients: a discrete choice experiment in fertility care. Human Reproduction 2011, 26:584-593.
5. Parsons T. The structure of social action 1968, The Free Press (1937), New York.
6. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior 1985, Plenum Publishing Co, New York.
7. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry 2000, 11:227-268.
8. Smith P.C., Mossialos E., Papanicolas I., Leatherman S. Performance measurement for health system improvement: experiences, challenges and prospects 2009, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Shibuya K., Boerma J. Measuring progress towards reducing health inequalities. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2005, 83:162.
10. McKie J., Richardson J. Neglected equity issues in cost effectiveness analysis 2005, Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, West Heidelberg, Victoria.
11. Norman R, Hall J, Street D, Viney R. Efficiency and equity: a stated preference approach. Health Economics, First published online 23 April 2012. , in press. doi:10.1002/hec.2827.
12. Frey B.S., Benz M.A., Stutzer Introducing procedural utility: not only what, but also how matters. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 2004, 160:377-401.
13. Murray C.J.L., Knaul F., Musgrove P., Xu K., Kawabata K. Defining and measuring fairness in financial contribution to the health system 2000, World Health Organization, Geneva.
14. Xu K., Klavus J., Evans D.B., Hanvoravongchai P., Zeramdini R., Murray C.J.L. Understanding household catastrophic health expenditures: a multi-country analysis. Health system performance assessment: debates, methods and empiricism 2003, 566-573. World Health Organization, Geneva. C.J.L. Murray, D.B. Evans (Eds.).
15. Arah O.A., Westert G.P., Hurst J., Klazinga N.S. A conceptual framework for the OECD health care quality indicators project. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2006, 18:5.
16. OECD. The OECD health project: Towards high-performing health systems. Paris. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2004.
17. Murray C.J.L., Lauer J., Tandon A., Frenk J. Overall health system achievement for 191 countries 2000, World Health Organization, Geneva.
18. Gakidou E.E., Murray C.J.L., Evans D.B. Quality and equity: preferences for health system outcomes. Health system performance assessment: debates, methods and empiricism 2003, 667-765. World Health Organization, Geneva. C.J.L. Murray, D.B. Evans (Eds.).
19. Almeida C., Braveman P., Gold M.R., Szwarcwald C.L., Ribeiro J.M., Miglionico A., et al. Methodological concerns and recommendations on policy consequences of the World Health Report 2000. The Lancet 2001, 357:1692-1697.
20. Williams A. Science or marketing at WHO? A commentary on 'World Health 2000'. Health Economics 2001, 10:93-100.
21. Smith P. Developing composite indicators for assessing overall system efficiency. Measuring up: improving health system performance in OECD countries 2002, 275-295. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris. P. Smith (Ed.).
22. Gakidou E, Murray CJL, Frenk J. Measuring preferences on health system performance assessment. GPE Discussion Paper No. 20. World Health Organization. Geneva; 2000.
23. Richardson J., Wildman J., Robertson I.K. A critique of the World Health Organisation's evaluation of health system performance. Health Economics 2003, 12:355-366.
24. Oswaldo Cruz Foundation. Report of the workshop "Health Systems Performance - the World Health Report 2000", ; cited November 2011. http://www.who.int/health-systems-performance/docs/articles/oswaldocruz_report.pdf.
25. Lauer J.A., Evans D.B., Murray C.J.L. Measuring health system attainment: the impact of variability in the importance of social goals. Health systems performance assessment: debates, methods and empiricism 2003, 677-681. World Health Organization, Geneva. C.J.L. Murray, D.B. Evans (Eds.).
26. Lauer J., Lovell C.A.K., Murray C., Evans D. World health system performance revisited: the impact of varying the relative importance of health system goals. BMC Health Services Research 2004, 4:19.
27. Lancaster K.J. A new approach to consumer theory. The Journal of Political Economy 1966, 74:132-157.
28. Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., Swait J.D. Stated choice methods: analysis and applications 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
29. Dolan P., Olsen J.A., Menzel P., Richardson J. An inquiry into the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in health. Health Economics 2003, 12:545-551.
30. Rawls J. A theory of justice 1971, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
31. Keeney R.L., Raiffa H. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs 1993, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2nd ed.
32. Kjær T. A review of the discrete choice experiment-with emphasis on its application in health care. University of Denmark. 2005. Health Economic Papers 2005:1.
33. Ortiz J.P., Valentine N.B., Gakidou E.E., Tandon A., Kawabata K., Evans D.B., et al. Inequality in responsiveness: population surveys from 16 OECD countries 2003, 667-675. World Health Organization, Geneva. C.J.L. Murray, D.B. Evans (Eds.).
34. Otten F., Bos W., Vrooman C., Hoff S. Poverty notice 2006 [in Dutch: Armoedebericht 2006] 2006, Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Den Haag.
35. Street D.J., Burgess L., Louviere J.J. Quick and easy choice sets: constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2005, 22:459-470.
36. Williams A., Cookson R Equity in health. North Holland handbook of health economics 2000, 1863-1909. Elsevier, Amsterdam. A.J. Culyer, J.P. Newhouse (Eds.).
37. Salkeld G., Ryan M., Short L. The veil of experience: do consumers prefer what they know best?. Health Economics 2000, 9:267-270.
38. Ryan M., Amaya-Amaya M. Threats to and hopes for estimating benefits. Health Economics 2005, 14:609-619.