Number of events and reliability in fMRI

Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 615-626

  Turner, Benjamin O ^a   Miller, Michael B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Design and analysis; Neuroimaging; Statistical power

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; METHODOLOGY; NEUROIMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEUROIMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84885156212     PISSN: 15307026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13415-013-0178-2     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bennett, C. M.; & Miller, M. B. (2010). How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1191, 133-155.
2. Bennett, C. M.; & Miller, M. B. (2013). Differences in reliability of block versus event-related designs. Manuscript submitted for publication.
3. Button, K. S.; Ioannidis, J. P. A.; Mokrysz, C.; Nosek, B. A.; Flint, J.; Robinson, E. S. J.; & Munafò, M. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14, 365-376. doi: 10.1038/nrn3475
4. Caceres, A.; Hall, D. L.; Zelaya, F. O.; Williams, S. C. R.; & Mehta, M. A. (2009). Measuring fMRI reliability with the intra-class correlation coefficient. NeuroImage, 45, 758-768.
5. Carp, J. (2012). The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature. NeuroImage, 63, 289-300.
6. Dale, A. M. (1999). Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 8, 109-114.
7. Desmond, J. E.; & Glover, G. H. (2002). Estimating sample size in functional MRI (fMRI) neuroimaging studies: Statistical power analyses. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 118, 115-128. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0270(02)00121-8
8. Eklund, A.; Andersson, M.; Josephson, C.; Johannesson, M.; & Knutsson, H. (2012). Does parametric fMRI analysis with SPM yield valid results? An empirical study of 1484 rest datasets. NeuroImage, 61, 565-578.
9. Friston, K. J.; Zarahn, E.; Josephs, O.; Henson, R. N. A.; & Dale, A. M. (1999). Stochastic designs in event-related fMRI. NeuroImage, 10, 607-619.
10. Gorgolewski, K. J.; Storkey, A. J.; Bastin, M. E.; Whittle, I.; & Pernet, C. (2013). Single subject fMRI test-retest reliability metrics and confounding factors. NeuroImage, 69, 231-243.
11. Green, D. M.; & Swets, J. A. (1974). Signal detection theory and psychophysics (Rev. ed). Huntington, NY: Krieger.
12. Killeen, P. R. (2005a). An alternative to null hypothesis significance tests. Psychological Science, 16, 345-353.
13. Killeen, P. R. (2005b). Replicability, confidence, and priors. Psychological Science, 16, 1009-1012.
14. Liu, T. T.; & Frank, L. R. (2004). Efficiency, power, and entropy in event-related fMRI with multiple trial types: Part I. Theory. NeuroImage, 21, 387-400.
15. Liu, T. T.; Frank, L. R.; Wong, E. C.; & Buxton, R. B. (2001). Detection power, estimation efficiency, and predictability in event-related fMRI. NeuroImage, 13, 759-773.
16. Macmillan, N. A.; & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user's guide. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. McGonigle, D. J. (2012). Test-retest reliability in fMRI: or how I learned to stop worrying and love the variability. NeuroImage, 62, 1116-1120.
18. McGonigle, D. J.; Howseman, A.; Athwal, B.; Friston, K.; Frackowiak, R.; & Holmes, A. (2000). Variability in fMRI: An examination of intersession differences. NeuroImage, 11, 708-734.
19. Miller, M. B.; Donovan, C. L.; Bennett, C. M.; Aminoff, E. M.; & Mayer, R. E. (2012). Individual differences in cognitive style and strategy predict similarities in the patterns of brain activity between individuals. NeuroImage, 59, 83-93.
20. Miller, M. B.; Donovan, C.-L.; Van Horn, J. D.; German, E.; Sokol-Hessner, P.; & Wolford, G. L. (2009). Unique and persistent individual patterns of brain activity across different memory retrieval tasks. NeuroImage, 48(3), 625-635.
21. Miller, M. B.; Van Horn, J. D.; Wolford, G. L.; Handy, T. C.; Valsangkar-Smyth, M.; Inati, S.; Gazzaniga, M. S. (2002). Extensive individual differences in brain activations associated with episodic retrieval are reliable over time. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1200-1214.
22. Mumford, J. A.; & Nichols, T. E. (2008). Power calculation for group fMRI studies accounting for arbitrary design and temporal autocorrelation. NeuroImage, 39, 261-268.
23. Mumford, J. A.; Turner, B. O.; Ashby, F. G.; & Poldrack, R. A. (2012). Deconvolving BOLD activation in event-related designs for multivoxel pattern classification analyses. NeuroImage, 59, 2636-2643. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.076
24. Power, J. D.; Barnes, K. A.; Snyder, A. Z.; Schlaggar, B. L.; & Petersen, S. E. (2011). Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. NeuroImage, 59, 2142-2154.
25. Turner, B. O.; Donovan, C.-L.; & Miller, M. B. (2013). Dissociating memory processes by their differences in neural stability. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society.
26. Van Dijk, K. R. A.; Sabuncu, M. R.; & Buckner, R. L. (2012). The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. NeuroImage, 59, 431-438.
27. Vul, E.; Harris, C.; Winkielman, P.; & Pashler, H. (2009). Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 274-290. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01125.x
28. Wager, T. D.; & Nichols, T. E. (2003). Optimization of experimental design in fMRI: A general framework using a genetic algorithm. NeuroImage, 18, 293-309.
29. Worsley, K. J.; & Friston, K. J. (1995). Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited - again. NeuroImage, 2, 173-181.