Effect of stimulus width on simultaneous contrast

PeerJ

Volumn 2013, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Shi, Veronica ^a   Cui, Jie ^a   Troncoso, Xoana G ^a,b   Macknik, Stephen L ^a   Martinez Conde, Susana ^a  

^a BARROW NEUROLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Brightness; Edges; Illusion; Simultaneous contrast; Size; Width

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRIGHTNESS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; EYE POSITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; RECEPTIVE FIELD; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 84885139061     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21678359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.146     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Blakeslee B,McCourt ME. 1997. Similar mechanisms underlie simultaneous brightness contrast and grating induction. Vision Research 37:2849-2869 DOI 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00086-2.
2. Blakeslee B,McCourt ME. 1999. A multiscale spatial filtering account of the White effect, simultaneous brightness contrast and grating induction. Vision Research 39:4361-4377 DOI 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00119-4.
3. Brenner E, Cornelissen FW. 1991. Spatial interactions in color vision depend on distances between boundaries. Naturwissenschaften 78:70-73 DOI 10.1007/BF01206259.
4. Chevreul ME. 1839. De la loi du contraste simultané des couleurs et de l'assortiment des objets colorés. Paris: Pitois-Levreault.
5. Derrington AM, Lennie P. 1984. Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. The Journal of Physiology 357:219-240.
6. De Valois RL, Pease PL. 1971. Contours and contrast: responses of monkey lateral geniculate nucleus cells to luminance and color figures. Science 171:694-696 DOI 10.1126/science.171.3972.694.
7. Diamond AL. 1953. Foveal simultaneous brightness contrast as a function of inducing- and test-field luminances. Journal of Experimental Psychology 45:304-314 DOI 10.1037/h0060230.
8. Diamond AL. 1955. Foveal simultaneous contrast as a function of inducing-field area. Journal of Experimental Psychology 50:144-152 DOI 10.1037/h0045936.
9. Diamond AL. 1960. A theory of depression and enhancement in the brightness response. Psychological Review 67:168-199 DOI 10.1037/h0045342.
10. Diamond AL. 1962. Simultaneous contrast as a function of test-field area. Journal of Experimental Psychology 64:336-345 DOI 10.1037/h0042693.
11. Enroth-Cugell C, Robson JG. 1966. The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat. The Journal of Physiology 187:517-552.
12. Geier J, Hudák M. 2011. Changing the Chevreul illusion by a background luminance ramp: lateral inhibition fails at its traditional stronghold-a psychophysical refutation. PLoS ONE 6:e26062 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0026062.
13. Heinemann EG. 1955. Simultaneous brightness induction as a function of inducing and test-field luminances. Journal of Experimental Psychology 50:89-96 DOI 10.1037/h0040919.
14. Hering E. 1872. Zur Lehre von Lichtsinne I: ueber successieve Lichtinduktion. Sitzber. Akademie Der Wissenschaft Wien, Mathematik Naturwissenschaft 66:5-24.
15. Hering E. 1964. Outlines of a theory of the light sense. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
16. Hess C, Pretori H. 1894. Messende Untersuchungen über die Gesetzmässigkeit des simultanen Helligkeits-Contrastes. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 40:1-24 DOI 10.1007/BF01693963.
17. Hubel DH. 1995. Eye, brain, and vision. New York: Scientific American Library.
18. Hurvich LM, Jameson D. 1966. The perception of brightness and darkness. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
19. Irvin GE, Casagrande VA, Norton TT. 1993. Center/surround relationships of magnocellular, parvocellular, and koniocellular relay cells in primate lateral geniculate nucleus. Visual Neuroscience 10:363-373 DOI 10.1017/S0952523800003758.
20. Kitterle FL. 1972. The effects of simultaneous and successive contrast on perceived brightness. Vision Research 12:1923-1931 DOI 10.1016/0042-6989(72)90080-6.
21. Leibowitz H,Mote FA, Thurlow WR. 1953. Simultaneous contrast as a function of separation between test and inducing fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology 46:453-456 DOI 10.1037/h0062595.
22. Levitt JB, Schumer RA, Sherman SM, Spear PD,Movshon JA. 2001. Visual response properties of neurons in the LGN of normally reared and visually deprived macaque monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology 85:2111-2129.
23. Macknik SL,Martinez-Conde S, Haglund MM. 2000. The role of spatiotemporal edges in visibility and visual masking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97:7556-7560 DOI 10.1073/pnas.110142097.
24. Marr D, Hildreth E. 1980. Theory of edge detection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B 207:187-217 DOI 10.1098/rspb.1980.0020.
25. Marsden AM. 1969. An elemental theory of induction. Vision Research 9:653-663 DOI 10.1016/0042-6989(69)90122-9.
26. Paradiso MA, Nakayama K. 1991. Brightness perception and filling-in. Vision Research 31:1221-1236 DOI 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90047-9.
27. Perna A,Morrone MC. 2007. The lowest spatial frequency channel determines brightness perception. Vision Research 47:1282-1291 DOI 10.1016/j.visres.2007.01.011.
28. Rodieck RW. 1965. Quantitative analysis of cat retinal ganglion cell response to visual stimuli. Vision Research 5:583-601 DOI 10.1016/0042-6989(65)90033-7.
29. Shapiro A, Knight E. 2008. Spatial and temporal influences on the contrast gauge. Vision Research 48:2642-2648 DOI 10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.027.
30. Stevens JC. 1967. Brightness inhibition re size of surround. Perception and Psychophysics 2(5):189-192 DOI 10.3758/BF03213048.
31. Tadmor Y, Tolhurst DJ. 2000. Calculating the contrasts that retinal ganglion cells and LGN neurones encounter in natural scenes. Vision Research 40:3145-3157 DOI 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00166-8.
32. Thomas JP. 1970. Model of the function of receptive fields in human vision. Psychological Review 77:121-134 DOI 10.1037/h0028682.
33. Troncoso XG,Macknik SL,Martinez-Conde S. 2005. Novel visual illusions related to Vasarely's "nested squares" show that corner salience varies with corner angle. Perception 34:409-420 DOI 10.1068/p5383.
34. Troncoso XG,Macknik SL,Martinez-Conde S. 2009. Corner salience varies linearly with corner angle during flicker-augmented contrast: a general principle of corner perception based on Vasarely's artworks. Spatial Vision 22:211-224 DOI 10.1163/156856809788313129.
35. Troncoso XG, Tse PU,Macknik SL, Caplovitz GP, Hsieh P-J, Schlegel AA, Otero-Millan J, Martinez-Conde S. 2007. BOLD activation varies parametrically with corner angle throughout human retinotopic cortex. Perception 36:808-820 DOI 10.1068/p5610.
36. Wichmann FA, Hill NJ. 2001. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics 63:1293-1313 DOI 10.3758/BF03194544.
37. Yund EW, Armington JC. 1975. Color and brightness contrast effects as a function of spatial variables. Vision Research 15:917-929 DOI 10.1016/0042-6989(75)90231-X.
38. Yund EW, Snodderly DM, Hepler NK, De Valois RL. 1977. Brightness contrast effects in monkey lateral geniculate nucleus. Sensory Processes 1:260-271.