Assessing the scale of resource recovery for centralized and satellite wastewater treatment

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 47, Issue 19, 2013, Pages 10762-10770

  Lee, Eun Jung ^a   Criddle, Craig S ^a   Bobel, Phil ^b   Freyberg, David L ^a  

^a Stanford University ^*  (United States)

^b City of Palo Alto ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENTRALIZED RESOURCES; COLLECTION SYSTEMS; COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS; DECISION-MAKING STRATEGIES; HYBRID CONFIGURATIONS; PERFORMANCE METRICS; SATELLITE RESOURCES; WATER AND ENERGIES;

DECISION MAKING; INVESTMENTS; NATURAL RESOURCES; RECOVERY; SATELLITES; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; INVESTMENT; RECYCLING; SEWAGE TREATMENT; WASTE FACILITY;

ARTICLE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ENERGY RECOVERY; METHODOLOGY; RATING SCALE; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WASTE WATER RECYCLING; WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT; WATER SUPPLY; WATER TREATMENT;

CALIFORNIA; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WASTE WATER;

EID: 84885137132     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es401011k     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Verstraete, W.; Van de Caveye, P.; Diamantis, V. Maximum use of resources present in domestic "used water" Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100 (23) 5537-5545
2. City of San Diego Recycled Water Master Plan Update; City of San Diego: San Diego, CA, 2005; http://www.sandiego.gov/water/pdf/050927waterreuse.pdf.
3. City of Palo Alto Recycled Water Facility Plan; The City of Palo Alto: Palo Alto, CA, 2008; http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/ 15103.
4. New Approaches in Decentralized Water Infrastructure; X-830851; Coalition for Alternative Wastewater Treatment: Gloucester, MA, 2008; http://www.ndwrcdp.org/documents/04-dec-5sg/04dec5report.pdf.
5. Gikas, P.; Tchobanoglous, G. The role of satellite and decentralized strategies in water resources management J. Environ. Manage. 2009, 90 (1) 144-152
6. Introduction to Decentralized Wastewater Treatment: A Sensible Solution; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C., 2012; http://www.biomicrobics.com/assets/EPA-MOU-Intro-Paper-081712-pdf-Adobe-Acrobat- Pro.pdf.
7. Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems: A Program Strategy; EPA 832-R-05-002; US Environmental Protection Agency: Cincinnati, OH, 2005; http://www.wastewatereducation.org/watertowaste/epa-septic-program
8. Overcoming Barriers to Evaluation and Use of Decentralized Wastewater Technologies and Management; Water and Environment Research Foundation: Alexandria, VA, 2007; http://www.ndwrcdp.org/documents/04-dec-2/04-dec-2full. pdf.
9. Development of Decentralised Anaerobic Digestion Systems for Application in the UK Phase 1-Final Report; Lettinga Associates Foundation: Wageningen, the Netherlands, 2009; http://www.communitycompost.org/CCN-documents/Small-scale-AD- for-CCN-Phase1-report.pdf.
10. Integrated Biogas Solutions, version 2.0; AGAMA Energy: Westlake, South Africa, 2007; www.agama.co.za.
11. McCarty, P. L.; Bae, J.; Kim, J. Domestic wastewater treatment as a net energy producer-Can this be achieved? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (17) 7100-7106
12. Spanjers, H.; Lier, J. B. v. Instrumentation in anaerobic treatment-research and practice Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 53 (4-5) 63-76
13. Triantaphyllou, E.; Baig, K. The impact of aggregating benefit and cost criteria in four MCDA methods IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 2005, 52 (2) 213-226
14. Huang, I. B.; Keisler, J.; Linkov, I. Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: Ten years of applications and trends Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409 (19) 3578-3594
15. Løken, E. Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2007, 11 (7) 1584-1595
16. Urban Water Management Plan; City of Palo Alto Utilities: Palo Alto, CA, 2005; http://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/25622.
17. Mutikanga, H.; Sharma, S.; Vairavamoorthy, K. Multi-criteria decision analysis: A strategic planning tool for water loss management Water Resour. Manage 2011, 25 (14) 3947-3969
18. Wang, J.-J.; Jing, Y.-Y.; Zhang, C.-F.; Zhao, J.-H. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2009, 13 (9) 2263-2278
19. California Renewables Portfolio Standard. http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUC/ energy/Renewables/index.htm.
20. Bouyssou, D. Outranking methods Encycl. Optim. 2001, 4, 249-255
21. Linkov, I.; Multi-criteria decision analysis: A framework for managing contaminated sediments. In Strategic Management of Marine Ecosystems; Levner, E.; Linkov, I.; Proth, J.-M., Eds.; Springer: Netherlands: 2005; pp 271-297.
22. Behzadian, M.; Kazemzadeh, R. B.; Albadvi, A.; Aghdasi, M. PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2010, 200 (1) 198-215
23. Brans, J.-P.; Promethee methods. In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys; Springer: New York: 2005; pp 163-186.
24. Mitchell, V. G.; Mein, R. G.; McMahon, T. A. Modelling the urban water cycle Environ. Modell. Software 2001, 16 (7) 615-629
25. Clean Bay Pollution Prevention Plan; The City of Palo Alto's Environmental Compliance Division: Palo Alto, CA, 2012; http://archive. cityofpaloalto.org/civica/filebank/blobdload.asp?BlobID=30576s.
26. Prato, T.; Parent, R. G. Nitrate and nitrite removal from municipal drinking water supplies with electrodialysis reversal. 1993 Membrane Conference Proceedings; AWWA Seminar Proceedings; American Water Works Association: Denver, CO, 1993
27. Comparison of advanced treatment methods for partial desalting of tertiary effluents; DWPR Report No. 97; U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation: Denver, CO, 2009; http://www.usbr.gov/research/AWT/reportpdfs/ report097.pdf.
28. Vindis, P.; Mursec, B.; Janzekovic, M.; Cus, F. The impact of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion on biogas production J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng. 2009, 36, 192-198
29. LCAMER-An Assessment Tool for Managing Cost-Effective Energy Recovery from Anaerobically Digested Wastewater Solids; 01-CTS-18UR; Water Environment Research Foundation: Alexandria, VA, 2006; http://www.werf.org/a/ka/Search/ ResearchProfile.aspx?ReportId=OWSO4R07is.
30. The Regional Water Quality Control Plant. http://cleanbay.org/about-us.
31. Huber Vacuum Rotation Membrane VRM Bioreactor. http://www.huber- technology.com/products/membrane-bioreactor-mbr/huber-vrmr-bioreactor.html.
32. Emerging Technologies for Wastewater Treatment and In-Plant Wet Weather Management; EPA 832-R-06-006; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C., 2008; http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/upload/2008-03-13-mtb- emerging-technologies.pdf.
33. Low Cost Treatment Technologies for Small Scale Water Reclamation Plants; Water Reuse Research Foundation: Alexandria, VA, 2010; http://www.watereuse. org/node/926.
34. Melcer, H.; Keucken, A.; Hackner, T. Pilot testing of new vacuum rotating membrane bioreactor technology Proc. Water Environ. Fed. 2009, 2009 (14) 2837-2856
35. Recycled Water Guidelines and Standards, 2009; http://www.sandiego.gov/ water/pdf/cip/book7.pdf.
36. Jablonský, J. Software support for multiple criteria decision making problems Int. Sci. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 2009, 4 (2) 29-34
37. Triantaphyllou, E.; Sánchez, A. A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multi-criteria decision-making methods Decis. Sci. 1997, 28 (1) 151-194