Erratum: Quantitative analysis of the evolution of novelty in cinema through crowdsourced keywords (Scientific Reports (2013) 3 (2758) DOI: 10.1038/srep02758);Quantitative analysis of the evolution of novelty in cinema through crowdsourced keywords

Scientific Reports

Volumn 3, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Sreenivasan, Sameet ^a,b  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CREATIVITY; CROWDSOURCING; ECONOMICS; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; INTERNET; LANGUAGE; PROBABILITY; RECREATION; TIME; ARTICLE;

CREATIVITY; CROWDSOURCING; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTERNET; LANGUAGE; PROBABILITY; RECREATION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84885111304     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep03972     Document Type: Erratum

References (43)

1. 2011 Theatrical Market Statistics, Motion Picture Association of America http://www.mpaa.org/policy/industry (Accessed March 15, 2013).
2. DeVany, A. Hollywood Economics: How Extreme Uncertainty Shapes the Film Industry (Routledge, 2003).
3. Michel, J.-B. et al. Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331, 176-182 (2011).
4. Halpin, H., Robu, V. & Shepherd, H. The complex dynamics of collaborative tagging. Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, WWW '07, 211-220 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2007). (Pubitemid 47582251)
5. Cattuto, C., Loreto, V. & Pietronero, L. Semiotic dynamics and collaborative tagging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 1461-1464 (2007). (Pubitemid 46214612)
6. Brooks, C. H. Montanez, N. An analysis of the effectiveness of tagging in blogs. AAAI Spring Symposium: Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs '06, 9-14 (2006). (Pubitemid 44230517)
7. McAuley, J. & Leskovec, J. Image labeling on a network: using social-network metadata for image classification. Proceedings of the 12th European conference on Computer Vision-Volume Part IV, ECCV'12, 828-841 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012).
8. Farooq, U. et al. Evaluating tagging behavior in social bookmarking systems: metrics and design heuristics. GROUP '07: Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work, 351-360 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2007).
9. Levy, M. & Sandler, M. A semantic space for music derived from social tags. ISMIR'07, 411-416 (2007).
10. Shepitsen, A., Gemmell, J., Mobasher, B. & Burke, R. Personalized recommendation in social tagging systems using hierarchical clustering. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems, RecSys '08, 259-266 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2008).
11. Szomszor, M. et al. Folksonomies, the Semantic Web, and Movie Recommendation. Bridging the Gap between Semantic Web and Web 2.0 (SemNet 2007) 71-84 (2007).
12. Gupta, M., Li, R., Yin, Z. & Han, J. Survey on social tagging techniques. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 12, 58-72 (2010).
13. Milicevic, A. K., Nanopoulos, A. & Ivanovic, M. Social tagging in recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. Artif. Intell. Rev. 33, 187-209 (2010).
14. Mestyán, M., Yasseri, T. & Kertész, J. Early prediction of box-office success based on Wikipedia activity big data. PLoS ONE 8(8): e71226 (2013).
15. Koestler, A. The Act of Creation (Penguin Books, 1990).
16. Boden, M. A. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms (Routledge, 2003).
17. Hoftsadter, D. R. Metamagical Themas, chap. 12 (Basic Books, 1985).
18. Sluckin,W., Colman, A. M. & Hargreaves, D. J. Liking words as a function of the experienced frequency of their occurrence. Brit. J. Psychol. 71, 163-169 (1980).
19. Berns, G. Satisfaction: The Science of Finding True Fulfillment (Henry Holt and Co., 2005).
20. Anand, P. Holbrook, M. B. Chasing theWundt curve: an adventure in consumer esthetics. Adv. Consum. Res. 13, 655-657 (1986).
21. Saunders, R. & Gero, J. S. How to study artificial creativity. Proceedings of the 4th conference on Creativity&cognition,C&C'02, 80-87 (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2002).
22. Berlyne, D. E. Aesthetics and Psychobiology (Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1971).
23. Berlyne, D. Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Percept. Psychophys. 8, 279-286 (1970).
24. Ellis, J. C. & Wexman, V. W. A History of Film (Allyn and Bacon, 2002).
25. Mcdonald, P. & Wasko, J. (ed.) The Contemporary Hollywood Film Industry (Wiley-Blackwell, 2008).
26. Petersen, A. M., Tenenbaum, J., Havlin, S. & Stanley, H. E. Statistical laws governing fluctuations in word use from word birth to word death. Sci. Rep. 2, 313; doi:10.1038/srep00313 (2012).
27. Collins, R. M. Transforming America: Politics and Culture During the Reagan Years (Columbia University Press, 2009).
28. McKeage, K. K. Materialism and self-indulgences: Themes of materialism in selfgift giving. Rudmin, F. W. Richins, M. (eds.) Meaning, Measure, andMorality of Materialism, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 140-146 (1992).
29. Peng, C. K. et al.Mosaic organization of DNA nucleotides. Phys. Rev. E 49, 16851 (1994).
30. Sedgwick, J. & Pokorny, M. The film business in the United States and Britain during the 1930s. Econ. Hist. Rev. 58, 79 (2005).
31. Jewell, R. The Golden Age of Cinema: Hollywood, 1929-1945 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2007).
32. Cover, T. M. & Thomas, J. A. Elements of information theory (Wiley-Interscience, 2006).
33. Chapman, J. Licence to Thrill: A Cultural History of the James Bond Films (Cinema and Society) (I. B. Tauris, 2008).
34. Virkar, Y. & Clauset, A. Power law distributions in binned empirical data. arXiv:1208.3524.
35. Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R. Newman, M. E. J. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev. 51, 661-703 (2009).
36. Havre, S., Hetzler, B. & Nowell, L. Themeriver: Visualizing theme changes over time. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2000, INFOVIS '00, 115 (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 2000).
37. Byron, L. Wattenberg, M. Stacked graphs-geometry & aesthetics. IEEE T. Vis. Comput. Gr. 14, 1245-1252 (2008).
38. Nachbar, J. Focus on the Western (Prentice-Hall, 1974).
39. Blei, D. M., Griffiths, T. L., Jordan, M. I. & Tenenbaum, J. B. Hierarchical topic models and the nested chinese restaurant process. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2003 (MIT Press, 2004).
40. Veale, T., Gervás, P., Pérez, Y. & Pérez, R. Computational creativity: A continuing journey. Minds Mach. 20, 483-487 (2010).
41. Steuer, R., Kurths, J., Daub, C. O., Weise, J. & Selbig, J. The mutual information: Detecting and evaluating dependencies between variables. Bioinformatics 18, S231-S240 (2002). (Pubitemid 41073239)
42. Darbellay, G. A. & Vajda, I. Estimation of the information by an adaptive partitioning of the observation space. IEEE T. Inform. Theory 1315-1321 (1999).
43. Darbellay, G. A. & Tichavsky, P. Independent component analysis through direct estimation of the mutual information. ICA'2000 Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Independent Component Analysis and Blind Signal Separation, Helsinki, Finland, 69-75 (2000).