Designated-verifier proxy signature schemes

IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Volumn 181, Issue , 2005, Pages 409-423

  Wang, Guilin ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR INFOCOMM RESEARCH   (Singapore)

Author keywords

digital signature; information security; proxy signature

Indexed keywords

AUTHENTICATION; NETWORK SECURITY; SECURITY OF DATA; UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING; MOBILE SECURITY;

DESIGNATED VERIFIERS; DESIGNATED-VERIFIER PROXY SIGNATURES; PROVABLY SECURE; PROXY SIGNATURE SCHEME; PROXY SIGNATURES; SCHNORR SIGNATURE SCHEME; SECRET KEY; SIGN MESSAGES;

ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84885075425     PISSN: 18684238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/0-387-25660-1_27     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. C. Adams and S. Farrell, Internet X.509 publtc key infrastructure: Certificate management protocols, RFC 25 10, March 1999.
2. F. Bao, R.H. Deng, and H. Zhu, Variations of Diffie-Hellman problem, in: Information and Communicatins Security (ICICS'03), LNCS 2836, pp. 301-312, Springer-Ve::. ig, 2003.
3. M. Bellare and P. Rogaway, Random oracles are practical: A paradigm for designing efficient protocols, in: Proc. of 1st ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS193), pp. 62-73, ACM Press, 1993.
4. A. Boldyreva, A. Palacio, and B. Warinschi, Secure proxy signature schemes for delegation of signing rights, Cryptology ePrint archive; http://eprint.iacr.org/20O3/096M, ay 2003.
5. D. Boneh, The decision Diffie-Hellman problem, in: Proc. of the Third Algorithmic Number Theory Symposium (ANTS198), LNCS 1423, pp. 48-63, Springer-Verlag, 1998.
6. D. Chaum and H. van Antwerpen, Undeniable signatures, in: CRYPT0'89, LNCS 435, pp. 212-2 16, Springer-Verlag, 1989.
7. D. Chaum, Zero-knowledge undeniable signatures, in: EUROCRYPT'90, LNCS 473, pp. 458-464, Springer-Verlag, 1991.
8. Y. Desmedt, C. Coutier, and S. Bengio, Special uses and abuses of the Fiat-Shamir passport protocol, in: CRYPT0'87, pp. 2 1-39, Springer-Verlag, 1987.
9. Y. Desmedt and M. Yung, Weakness of undeniable signature schemes, in: EUROCRYPT'9 1, LNCS 547, pp: 205-220, Springer-Verlag, 1991.
10. S. Goldwasser, S. Micah, and R. Rivest, A digital signature scheme secure against adaptive chosen-message attacks, SIAM Journal of Computing, 17(2): 281-308 (April 1988).
11. J. Herranz and Saez, Verifiable secret sharing for general access structures, with applications to fully distributed proxy signatures, in: Financial Cryptography (FC103), LNCS 2742, pp. 286-302, Springer-Verlag, 2003.
12. M. Jakobsson, Blackmailing using undeniable signatures, in: EUROCRYPTt96, LNCS 950, pp.: 425-427, Springer-Verlag, 1994.
13. M. Jakobsson, K. Sako, and R. Impagliazzo, Designated verifier proofs and their applications, in: EUROCRYPT'96, LNCS 1070, pp. 143-154, Springer-Verlag, 1996.
14. S. Kim, S. Park, and D. Won, Proxy signatures, revisited, in: Information and Communications Security (ICICS197), LNCS 1334, pp. 223-232, Springer-Verlag, 1997.
15. B. Lee, H. Kim, and K. Kim. Secure mobile agent using strong non-designated proxy signature, in: Information Security and Privacy (ACISP'OI), LNCS 21 19, pp. 474-486, Springer-Verlag, 2001.
16. J.-Y. Lee, J. H. Cheon, and S. Kim, An analysis of proxy signatures: Is a secure channel necessary? in: Topics in Cryptology-CT-RSA 2003, LNCS 26 12, pp. 68-79, Springer-Verlag, 2003.
17. M. Mambo, K. Usuda, and E. Okamoto, Proxy signatures: Delegation of the power to sign messages, IEICE Trans. Fundamentals, Vol. E79-A, No. 9, pp. 1338-1353 (Sep. 1996).
18. M. Mambo, K. Usuda, and E. Okamoto, Proxy signatures for delegating signing operation, in: Proc. of 3rd ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS196), pp. 48-57, ACM Press, 1996.
19. M. Meyers, C. Adams, D. Solo, and D. Kemp, Internet X.509 certificate request format, RFC 25 1 1, March 1999.
20. A. Nicolosi, M. Krohn, Y. Dodis, and D. Mazieres, Proactive two-party signatures For user authentication, in: Proc. of 10th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS'03); http://www.isoc.org/isoc/conferences/ndss/
21. D. Pointcheval and J. Stem, Security arguments for digital signatures and blind signatures, Journal of Cryptology, 13(3): 361-369 (2000).
22. S. Saeednia, S. Kremer, and O. Markowitch, An efficient strong designated verifier signature scheme, in: lnformation Security and Cryptology-ICLSC 2003, LNCS 2971, pp. 40-54, Springer-Verlag, 2004.
23. C. Schnorr, Efficient signature generation by smart cards, Journal of Cryptography, 4(3): 161-174 (1991).
24. C. Schnorr, Security of blind discrete log signatures against interactive attacks, in: Information and Communications Security (ICICS'OI), LNCS 2229, pp. 1-12, Springer-Verlag, 200 1.
25. R. Steinfeld, L. Bull, H. Wang, and J. Pieprzyk, Universal designated-verifier signatures, in: ASLACRYPT'03, LNCS 2894, pp. 523-542, Springer-Verlag, 2003.
26. R. Steinfeld, H. Wang, and J. Piepnyk, Efficient extension of standard Schnorri RSA signatures into universal designated-verifier signatures, in: PKC 2004, LNCS 2947, pp. 86-100, Springer-Verlag, 2004.
27. G. Wang. An Attack on not-interactive designated verifier proofs for undeniable signatures, Cryptology ePrint archive; http://eprint.iacr.org/2003/2431, Nov. 2003.
28. G. Wang, F. Bao, J. Zhou, and R. H. Deng, Security analysis of some proxy signatures, in: Information Security and Cryptology-ICISC 2003, LNCS 2971, pp. 305-3 19, Springer-Verlag, 2004.
29. K. Zhang, Threshold proxy signature schemes, in: Information Security Workshop (ISW197), LNCS 1396, pp. 282-290, Springer-Verlag, 1997.