Evaluating Local Knowledge to Develop Integrative Invasive-Species Control Strategies

Human Ecology

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 779-788

  Bart, David ^a   Simon, Matt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INVASIVE SPECIES; TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE;

EID: 84885052911     PISSN: 03007839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10745-013-9610-z     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Anaya, A. L. (1999). Allelopathy as a Tool in the Management of Biotic Resources in Agroecosystems. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 18: 697-739.
2. Anonymous. (1940). Wood County Wisconsin Agricultural Statistics. In: 20th Annual Report of the Wood County Agricultural Extension Service. Unumbered-47.
3. Apfelbaum, S. I., and Sams, C. E. (1992). Ecology and Control of Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.). Natural Areas Journal 7: 69-74.
4. Bagnall-Oakeley, H., Conroy, C., Faiz, A., Gunawan, A., Gouyon, A., Penot, E., and Anwar, C. (1996). Imperata Management Strategies Used in Smallholder Rubber-Based Farming Systems. Agroforestry Systems 36: 83-104.
5. Bart, D. (1997). The Use of Local Knowledge in Understanding Ecological Change: A Study of Salt Hay Farmers' Knowledge of Phragmites Australis Invasion. MA Thesis, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
6. Bart, D. (2006). Integrating Local Knowledge into Experimental Studies to Understand the Causes of Environmental Change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4: 541-546.
7. Bart, D. (2008). Looking for cause with all the small changes: using event ecology to find human causes of biological invasions. In McCay, B., Walters, B., West, C., and Leeds, S. (eds.), Against The Tides: The Vayda Tradition in Human Ecology and Ecological Anthropology. Lexington Press, Boston, pp. 99-116.
8. Bart, D. (2010). Using Weed Control Knowledge from Declining Agricultural Communities in Invasive Species Management. Human Ecology 38: 77-85.
9. Bart, D., Burdick, D., Chambers, R., and Hartman, J. (2006). Human facilitation of Phragmites australis invasions in tidal marshes: a review and synthesis. Wetlands Ecology and Management 14: 53-65.
10. Beck, D. A., Hubbard, D. E., and Higgins, K. F. (1987). Effects of haying on seasonal wetland hydrophyte and invertebrate populations in South Dakota. Completion Report, PR W-75-R, Job 4, study 7529, South Dakota Division of Wildlife, Pierre, SD.
11. Bedford, R. L., Zimmerman, E. H., and Zimmerman, J. H. (1974). The Wetlands of Dane County, Wisconsin for the Dane County Regional Planning Commission. Madison, WI.
12. Chamberlain, T. (1890). The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses. Science (Old Series) 15: 92-96.
13. Clout, M., and Williams, P. (2009). Invasive Species Management: A Handbook of Techniques. Oxford University Press, New York.
14. Creswell, J. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 3rd ed. Sage Publications, Los Angeles.
15. Curtis, J. (1946). Use of Mowing in Management of White Ladyslipper. The Journal of Wildlife Management 10: 303-308.
16. Curtis, J. (1959). The Vegetation of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
17. Eggers, S., and Reed, D. (1997). Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and Wisconsin. Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Jamestown, North Dakota.
18. Espeseth, E. (1955). Early Vilas County: Cradle of Industry. The Wisconsin Magazine of history 37: 27-34 + 51-54.
19. Foster, R. D., and Wetzel, P. R. (2005). Invading Monotypic Stands of Phalaris arundinacea: A Test of Fire, Herbicide, and Woody and Herbaceous Native Plant Groups. Restoration Ecology 13: 318-324.
20. Freedman, D. (2008). On Types of Scientific Inquiry: The Role of Qualitative Reasoning. In Box-Steffensmeier, J., Brady, H., and Collier, D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
21. Fujisaka, S., Moody, K., and Ingram, K. (1993). A Descriptive Study of Farming Practices for Dry Seeded Rainfed Lowland Rice in India, Indonesia, and Myanmar. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 45: 115-128.
22. Gillespie, J., and Murn, T. (1992). Mowing Controls Reed Canarygrass Releases Native Wetland Plants (Wisconsin). Restoration Management Notes 10: 93-94.
23. Gliessman, S. (1988). Ecology and management of weeds in traditional agroecosystems. In Altieri, M., and Liebman, M. (eds.), Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp. 237-244.
24. Glass, E. H., and Thurston, H. D. (1978). Traditional and Modern Crop Protection in Perspective. Bioscience 28: 109-115.
25. Goc, M. (1990). The Wisconsin Dustbowl. The Wisconsin Magazine of History 73: 162-201.
26. Hatch, B. K., and Bernthal, T. (2008). Final Report to the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region V Wetland Grant # 96544501-0.
27. Healy, M., and Zedler, J. (2010). Setbacks in Replacing Phalaris arundinacea Monotypes with Sedge Meadow Vegetation. Restoration Ecology 18: 155-164.
28. Herr-Turoff, A., and Zedler, J. B. (2007). Does Morphological Plasticity of the Phalaris arundinacea Canopy Increase Invasiveness? Plant Ecology 193: 265-277.
29. Holden, E., and Albert, A. (1932). Reed Canary Grass or Phalaris for Wisconsin Lowlands. Reed Canary Grass or Phalaris for Wisconsin Lowlands. Wisconsin Agriculture Extension Service Stencil Circular 342, University of Wisconsin Extension Service, College of Agriculture of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
30. Hulme, P. (2006). Beyond Control: Wider Implications for the Management of Biological Invasions. Journal of Applied Ecology 43: 835-847.
31. Kercher, S., and Zedler, J. (2004). Multiple Disturbances Accelerate Invasion of Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in a Mesocosm Study. Oecologia 138: 455-464.
32. Kéry, M., and Hatfield, J. (2003). Normality of Raw Data in General Linear Models: The Most Widespread Myth in Statistics. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 84: 92-94.
33. Lavergne, S., and Molofsky, J. (2004). Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris arundinacea) as a Biological Model in the Study of Plant Invasions. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 23: 415-429.
34. Maurer, D. A., Lindig-Cisneros, R., Werner, K. J., Kercher, S., Miller, R., and Zedler, J. B. (2003). The Replacement of Wetland Vegetation by Reed Canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea). Ecological Restoration 21: 116-119.
35. Middleton, B. (2002). Non-Equilibrium Dynamics of Sedge Meadows Grazed by Cattle in Southern Wisconsin. Plant Ecology 161: 89-110.
36. Miller, T., Martin, L., and MacConnell, C. (2008). Managing Reed Canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) to Aid in Revegetation of Riparian Buffers. Weed Technology 22: 507-513.
37. North Dakota Department of Agriculture. (2010). Invasive Species Web-Based Manual: Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris arundinacea). http://www. agdepartment. com/noxiousweeds/pdf/Reedcanarygrass. pdf (Accessed July 22, 2010).
38. Peach, M. (2005). Tussock Sedge Meadows and Topographic Heterogeneity: Ecological Patterns Underscore the Need for Experimental Approaches to Wetland Restoration Despite the Social Barriers. MS Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
39. Piper, C. V. (1924). Forage Plants and Their Culture. McMillan Co., New York.
40. Reinhardt, C., and Galatowitsch, S. M. (2004). Best Management Practices for the Invasive Phalaris arundinacea L. (Reed Canary Grass) in Wetland Restorations. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, MN. [Final Report, May 2004].
41. Rice, J., and Pinkerton, B. (1993). Reed Canarygrass Survival Under Cyclic Inundation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 48: 132-135.
42. Rill, K. (1983). A Vascular Flora of Winnebago County, Wisconsin. Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts, and Letters 71: 155-180.
43. Schwar, M. T. (2002). Hydrolic Restoration of a Groundwater-Fed Sedge Meadow Wetland in South-Central Wisconsin. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin--Madison.
44. Siges, T. H., Hartemink, A. E., Hebinck, P., and Allen, B. J. (2005). The Invasive Shrub Piper aduncum and Rural Livelihoods in the Finschhafen Area of Papua New Guinea. Human Ecology 33: 875-893.
45. Vayda, A. P. (1988). Actions and Consequences as Objects of Explanation in Human Ecology. Environment, Technology, and Society 51: 2-7.
46. Vayda, A. P. (2009). Explaining Human Actions and Environmental Changes. Altamira Press, Lantham.
47. Vayda, A. P., and Walters, B. (1999). Against Political Ecology. Human Ecology 27: 167-179.
48. Walters, B., and Vayda, A. (2008). Event Ecology, Causal Historical Analysis, and Human-Environment Research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 99: 534-553.
49. Wetzel, P., and van Der Valk, A. (1998). Effects of Nutrient and Soil Moisture on Competition Between Carex stricta, Phalaris arundinacea and Typha latifolia. Plant Ecology 138: 179-190.
50. Whitson, A. R., Dunnewald, T. J., Boardman, W. C., Post, C. B., and Albert, A. R. (1915). Special Report on the Reconnoissance Soil Survey of Vilas and Portions of Adjoining Counties, Wisconsin. State of Wisconsin, Madison.
51. Wilcox, J. C., Healy, M. T., and Zedler, J. B. (2007). Restoring Native Vegetation to an Urban Wet Meadow Dominated by Reed Canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in Wisconsin. Natural Areas Journal 27: 354-365.
52. Wright, L. (1958). The Transformation of Horicon Marsh. The Wisconsin Magazine of History 41: 132-135.