Payment for Environmental Services and Unequal Resource Control in Pimampiro, Ecuador

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1217-1233

  Rodríguez de Francisco, Jean Carlo ^a   Budds, Jessica ^b   Boelens, Rutgerd ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

agrarian livelihoods; Andes; Ecuador; inequality; payments for environmental services; peasant communities; watershed; working landscapes

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; PEASANT AGRICULTURE; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; WATERSHED;

ANDES; ECUADOR;

EID: 84885052325     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2013.825037     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Avellaneda, F., and D. Villafuerte. 2008. Propuesta de uso del agua en las micro-cuencas hidrográficas de Pimampiro en base a su vocación [Proposal for water use in the micro-watersheds of Pimampiro]. Quito, Ecuador: ESPE.
2. Bishop, J. 2010. State of play. World Conserv. 40 (1): 4 - 5.
3. Blaikie, P., H. Brookfield, B. Allen, R. Crittenden, and W. Clarke. 1987. Land degradation and society. London: Methuen.
4. Bryant, R., and S. Bailey. 1997. Third world political ecology. London: Routledge.
5. Budds, J., and M. Zwarteveen. 2012. Retheorizing ecosystem services: From human-ecology interactions to cultural landscapes. Paper presented at 32nd International Geographical Congress, Cologne, Germany, 26-30 August.
6. Büscher, B. 2012. Payments for ecosystem services as neoliberal conservation: (Reinterpreting) evidence from the Maloti-Drakensberg, South Africa. Conserv. Soc. 10 (1): 29 - 41.
7. Dauriac, C. 2005. El sistema de pago por servicios ambientales Pimampiro [The payment for environmental services scheme in Pimampiro]. Ibarra, Ecuador: VSF-CICDA.
8. Dulong, C. 2005. Diagnóstico de la gestión de recursos naturales en Mariano Acosta, Puetaqui y Yanajaca [Assessment of natural resources management in Mariano Acosta, Puetaqui and Yanajaca]. Ibarra, Ecuador: VSF-CICDA.
9. Duncan, E. 2006. Payments for environmental services: An equitable approach for reducing poverty and conserving nature. Zeist, the Netherlands: WWF.
10. Echavarría, M., J. Vogel, M. Albán, and F. Meneses. 2004. The impacts of payments for watershed services in Ecuador. London: IIED.
11. Engel, S., S. Pagiola, and S. Wunder. 2008. Designing payment for environmental services in theory and practice. Ecol. Econ. 65 (4): 663 - 674.
12. FAO. 2007. The state of food and agriculture: Paying farmers for environmental services. FAO Agriculture Series. Rome: FAO.
13. FAO. 2011. Payment for ecosystem services and food security. Rome: FAO.
14. Farley, K., W. Anderson, L. Bremer, and C. Harden. 2011. Compensation for ecosystem services: An evaluation of efforts to achieve conservation and development in Ecuadorian paramo grasslands. Environ. Conserv. 38 (4): 393 - 405.
15. GMP. 2010. Mariano Acosta. Pimampiro, Ecuador: Gobierno Municipal de Pimampiro 2010. www.pimampiro.gov.ec (accessed 4 April 2010).
16. Grieg-Gran, M., I. Porras, and S. Wunder. 2005. How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? World Dev. 33 (9): 1511 - 1527.
17. Kosoy, N., and E. Corbera. 2010. Payment for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecol. Econ. 69 (6): 1228 - 1236.
18. Landell-Mills, N., and I. Porras. 2002. Silver bullet or fools' gold?: A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impact on the poor. London: IIED.
19. Lee, E., and S. Mahanty. 2007. Payment for environmental services and poverty reduction: Risks and opportunities. Bangkok, Thailand: RECOFTC.
20. McAfee, K. 2012. The contradictory logic of global ecosystem services markets. Dev. Change 43 (1): 105 - 131.
21. McAfee, K., and E. Shapiro. 2010. Payment for ecosystem services in Mexico: Nature, neoliberalism, social movements, and the state. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 100 (3): 579 - 599.
22. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
23. Milne, S., and W. Adams. 2012. Market masquerades: Uncovering the politics of community-level payments for environmental services in Cambodia. Dev. Change 43 (2): 622 - 622.
24. Muradian, R., E. Corbera, U. Pascual, N. Kosoy, and P. May. 2010. Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payment for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 69 (6): 1202 - 1208.
25. Pagiola, S. 2008. Can payments for environmental services help protect coastal and marine areas? http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTENVMAT/Resources/3011340-1238620444756/5980735-1238620476358/8CanPayments.pdf (accessed 22 September 2010).
26. Pagiola, S., A. Arcenas, and G. Platais. 2005. Can payment for environmental services help reduce poverty? World Dev. 33 (2): 237 - 253.
27. Porras, I., M. Grieg-Gran, and N. Neves. 2008. All that glitters: A review of payments for watershed services in developing countries. London: IIED.
28. Preston, D. 1990. From hacienda to family farm: Changes in environment and society in Pimampiro, Ecuador. Geogr. J. 156 (1): 31 - 38.
29. Quintero, M., S. Wunder, and R. Estrada. 2009. For services rendered? Modeling hydrology and livelihoods in Andean payments for environmental services schemes. For. Ecol. Manage. 258 (9): 1871 - 1880.
30. Robbins, P. 2004. Political ecology: A critical introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
31. Rosa, H., S. Kandel, and L. Dimas. 2003. Compensation for environmental services and rural communities. San Salvador, Salvador: PRISMA.
32. Southgate, D., and S. Wunder. 2009. Paying for watershed services in Latin America: A review of current initiatives. J. Sustain. For. 28: 497 - 524.
33. Stanton, T., M. Echavarria, K. Hamilton, and C. Ott. 2010. State of watershed payments: An emerging marketplace. Washington, DC: Forest Trends.
34. UNEP/IUCN. 2007. Developing international payments for ecosystem services: Towards a greener world economy. http://www.unep.ch/etb/areas/pdf/IPES_IUCNbrochure.pdf (accessed 9 November 2010).
35. Van der Ploeg, J. D. 2008. The new peasantries: Struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization. London: Earthscan.
36. Vatn, A. 2010. An institutional analysis of payment for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 69 (6): 1245 - 1252.
37. Wunder, S. 2005. Payment for environmental services: Some nuts and bolts. Bogor Barat, Indonesia: CIFOR.
38. Wunder, S. 2008. Payment for environmental services and the poor: Concepts and preliminary evidence. Environ. Dev. Econ. 13: 279 - 297.
39. Wunder, S., and M. Albán. 2008. Decentralized payment for environmental services: The cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador. Ecol. Econ. 65 (4): 685 - 698.
40. Wunder, S., S. Engel, and S. Pagiola. 2008. Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payment for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecol. Econ. 65 (4): 834 - 852.
41. Yaguache, R. 2004. Pago por la protección de servicios ambientales: El caso de la Asociación Nueva América Pimampiro-Ecuador [Payment for the protection of environmental services: The case of Nueva América, Pimampiro, Ecuador]. Rev. Agroecol. Desarrollo 14: 1 - 6.
42. Yaguache, R., and R. Carrión. 2004. Construyendo una experiencia de desarrollo: El manejo de recursos naturales en Pimampiro. Ibarra, Ecuador: Cederena.
43. Zilberman, D., L. Lipper, and N. McCarthy. 2008. When could payment for environmental services benefit the poor? Environ. Dev. Econ. 13: 255 - 278.