Does personality affect social relationships? Assessing mediator role of social network, loneliness, and perceived social support;Sosyal ilişkilerde kişilik özellikleri etkili mi? Sosyal aǧ, yalnizlik ve algilanan sosyal desteǧin araci etki olarak incelenmesi

Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 46-52

  Tezer, Nihan ^a   Arkar, Haluk ^b  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Loneliness; Perceived social support; Personality dimensions

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; LONELINESS; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PATH ANALYSIS; PERSONALITY; SELF TRANSCENDENCE; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL NETWORK; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 84885045395     PISSN: 13026631     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5455/apd.34468     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Schmitt PJ, Kurdek LA. Age and gender differ-ences in and personality corelates of loneliness in different relationships. J Pers Assess 1985; 49:5.
2. Reevy GM, Maslach C. Use of social support: Gender and personality differences. Sex Roles 2001; 44:7-8.
3. Quimby JL, O'Brien KM. Predictors of well-being among nontraditional female students with child-ren. J Counsel Dev 2006; 84:451-460.
4. Elovainiao M, Kivimäki M, Puttonen S, Tarja H, Laura P, Keltikangas-Järvinen LH. Temperament and depressive symptoms: a population-based longitudinal study on Cloninger's psychobiolo-gical temperament model. J Affect Disord 2004; 83: 227-232.
5. Norris FH, Kaniasty K. Received and perceived social support in times of stress: A test of the Social Support Deterioration Deterrence Model. J Pers Soc Psychol 1996; 71:498-511.
6. Wiseman H, Mayseless O, Sharabany R. Why are they lonely? Perceived quality of early relation with parents, attachment, personality predispositions and loneliness in first-year uni-versity student. Pers Individual Differences 2006; 40:237-248.
7. Cheng H, Furnham A. Personality, peer relations, and self-confidence as predictors of happiness and loneliness. J Adolesc 2002; 25:327-339.
8. Halamandaris KF, Power KG. Individual differ-ences, social support and coping with the exa-mination stres: a study of the psychosocial and academic adjustment of first year home students. Pers Individual Differences 1999; 26: 665-685.
9. Asendorpf JB, Wilpers S. Personality effects on social relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998; 74:1531-1544.
10. Stephan E, Fath M, Lamm H. Loneliness as related to various personality and enviromental measures: research with the German Adaptation of UCLA Loneliness Scale. Soc Behaviour Pers 1988; 16:169-174.
11. Cohen S, Sherrod DR, Clark MS. Social skills and the stres-protective role of social support. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986; 50:963-973.
12. Kitamura T, Kijima N, Watanabe K,Takezaki Y, Tanaka E. Precedents of perceived social sup-port: personality and early experiences. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1999; 53:649-654.
13. Levin I, Stokes JP. An Examination of the relation of individual difference variables to loneliness. J Pers 1986; 54:4.
14. Cloninger CR. A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1987; 44:573-588.
15. Cloninger CR, Svrakic DM, Przybeck TR. A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993; 50:975-990.
16. Arkar H, Sorias O, Tunca Z. Mizaç ve Karakter Envanteri'nin Türkçe formunun faktör yapisi, geçerlik ve güvenirliǧi. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi 2005; 16:190-204.
17. Köse S, Sayar K, Ak I. Mizaç ve Karakter Envan-teri (Türkçe TCI): Geçerlik, güvenirliǧi ve faktör yapisi. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni 2004; 14:107-131.
18. Arkar H. Cloninger'in Psikobiyolojik Kişilik Kura-mi. Türk Psikoloji Bülteni 2005; 36:82-96.
19. Eker D, Arkar H. Perceived social support: psychometric properties of the MSPSS in normal and pathological groups in a developing country. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1995; 30:121-126.
20. Eker D, Arkar H, Yaldiz H. Generality of support sources and psychometric properties of a scale of perceived social support in Turkey. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2000; 35:228-233.
21. Demir A. UCLA Yalnizlik Ölçeǧinin geçerlik ve güvenirliǧi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 1989; 7:14-18.
22. Arkar H, Sari Ö., Fidaner H. Relationships be-tween quality of life, perceived social support, social network and loneliness in a Turkish sample. Yeni Symposium 2004; 42:20-27.
23. Eker D, Arkar H, Yaldiz H. Çok Boyutlu Algilanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeǧi'nin gözden geçirilmiş for-munun faktör yapisi, geçerlik ve güvenirliǧi. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi 2001; 12:17-25