Access to contraceptive methods and prevalence of use

Journal of Biosocial Science

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 761-778

  Ross, John ^a   Hardee, Karen ^a  

^a Palladium Group   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTIVE BEHAVIOR; CULTURAL FACTOR; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; PREGNANCY; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; PREGNANCY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84885045365     PISSN: 00219320     EISSN: 14697599     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0021932012000715     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bulatao, R. A., Palmore, A. & Ward, S. E. (eds) (1989) Choosing a Contraceptive: Method Choice in Asia and the United States. Westview Press.
2. Chamratrithirong, A. & Kamnuansilpa, P. (1984) How family planning availability affects contraceptive use: the case of Thailand. In Ross, J. & McNamara, R. (eds) Survey Analysis for the Guidance of Family Planning Programs. Center for Population and Family Health, Columbia University, New York, pp. 219-235.
3. Chao, D. N. W., Gupta, Y. P., Stover, J. & Talwar, P. P. (1994) Using age-specific appropriate method-mix strategy to achieve replacement level fertility in India: a model for policy analysis. Demography India 23(1 & 2), 157-166.
4. Choe, M. K. & Bulatao, R. A. (1992) Defining an appropriate contraceptive method mix to meet fertility preferences. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America.
5. Darroch, J. E., Sedgh, G. & Ball, H. (2011) Contraceptive Technologies: Responding to Women's Needs. Guttmacher Institute, New York, p. 51.
6. Freedman, R. & Berelson, B. (1976) The record of family planning programs. Studies in Family Planning 7(1), 1-40.
7. Jain, A. K. (1989) Fertility reduction and the quality of family planning services. Studies in Family Planning 20(1), 1-16.
8. Jones, E. F. (1984) The Availability of Contraceptive Services. WFS Comparative Studies No. 37, International Statistical Institute.
9. Kim, T. L. & Ross, J. (2007) The Korean breakthrough. In Robinson, W. & Ross, J. (eds) The Global Family Planning Revolution: Three Decades of Population Policies and Programs. World Bank, Washington DC, Chapter 11.
10. Lapham, R. J. & Mauldin, W. P. (1985) Contraceptive prevalence: the influence of organized family planning programs. Studies in Family Planning 16(3), 117-137.
11. Lynch, F. & Aganon, V. (1974) The Clinic Location Site Study. Research Note No. 13, Commission on Population, Rizal, Philippines.
12. Macro International (2011) DHS Series Stat Complier. URL: http://www.statcompiler.com/
13. Potter, R. G. (1971) Inadequacy of a one-method family planning program. Studies in Family Planning 2(1), 1-6.
14. Robinson, W. & El-Zanaty, F. H. (2007) The evolution of population policies and programs in the Arab Republic of Egypt. In Robinson, W. & Ross, J. (eds) The Global Family Planning Revolution: Three Decades of Population Policies and Programs. World Bank, Washington DC, Chapter 2.
15. Robinson, W. & Ross, J. (eds) (2007) The Global Family Planning Revolution: Three Decades of Population Policies and Programs. World Bank, Washington DC.
16. Rodriguez, G. (1978) Family planning availability and contraceptive prevalence. International Family Planning Perspectives 4(4), 100-115.
17. Rosenfield, A. G. & Min, C. J. (2007) The emergence of Thailand's national family planning program. In Robinson, W. & Ross, J. (eds) The Global Family Planning Revolution: Three Decades of Population Policies and Programs. World Bank, Washington, DC, Chapter 14.
18. Ross, J. & Agwanda A. T. (2012) Increased use of injectable contraception in sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Reproductive Health 16(4).
19. Ross, J., Hardee, K., Mumford, E. & Eid, S. (2002) Contraceptive method choice in developing countries. International Family Planning Perspectives 28(1), 32-40.
20. Ross, J. & Smith, E. (2011) Trends in national family planning programs: 1999, 2004, and 2009. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 37(3), 125-133.
21. Sullivan, T. M., Bertrand, J. T., Rice, J. & Shelton, J. D. (2006) Skewed contraceptive method mix: why it happens, why it matters. Journal of Biosocial Science 38(4), 501-521.
22. Tsui, A. O. (1982) Contraceptive availability and family limitation in Mexico and Rural Korea. International Family Planning Perspectives 8(1), 8-18.
23. United Nations Population Division (2011) World Contraceptive Use 2010. POP/DB/CP/Rev2010. URL: http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/unpp/panel-population.htm
24. Wang, W., Wang, S., Pullum, T. & Ametepi, P. (2012) How family planning supply and the service environment affect contraceptive use: findings from four East African countries. DHS Analytical Studies No. 26. ICF International, Calverton, Maryland, USA.