Time trend and variability of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with symptomatic gallstone disease

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 3254-3261

  Saia, Mario ^a   Mantoan, Domenico ^a   Buja, Alessandra ^b   Bertoncello, Chiara ^b   Baldovin, Tatjana ^b   Callegaro, Giampietro ^c   Baldo, Vincenzo ^b  

^a Health Agency of the Veneto Region   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^c Veneto Region Local Health Unit n 8   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cholecystitis; Delivery of health care; Disease management; Health care surveys; Surgical approach

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CAUSE OF DEATH; CHILD; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLELITHIASIS; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COHORT ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INFANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ITALY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVATE HOSPITAL; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD; SEX RATIO; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREND STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; CHOLELITHIASIS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; INFANT; ITALY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84885040868     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2902-y     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Festi D, Dormi A, Capodicasa S, Staniscia T, Attili AF, Loria P, Pazzi P, Mazzella G, Sama C, Roda E, Colecchia A (2008) Incidence of gallstone disease in Italy: results from a multicenter, population-based Italian study (the MICOL project). World J Gastroenterol 14(34):5282-5289
2. Berthou JCh, Dron B, Charbonneau P, Moussalier K, Pellissier L (2007) Evaluation of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones in a prospective series of 505 patients: indications and results. Surg Endosc 21(11):1970-1974
3. Suuronen S, Koski A, Nordstrom P, Miettinen P, Paajanen H (2010) Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in surgical training. Dig Surg 27(5):384-390
4. Kuwabara K, Matsuda S, Ishikawa KB, Horiguchi H, Fujimori K (2010) Comparative quality of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in the elderly using propensity score matching analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2010:490147
5. Ammori BJ, Vezakis A, Davides D, Martin IG, Larvin M, McMahon MJ (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in morbidly obese patients. Surg Endosc 15(11):1336-1339
6. Simopoulos C, Polychronidis A, Botaitis S, Perente S, Pitiakoudis M (2005) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in obese patients. Obes Surg 15(2):243-246
7. Farkas DT, Moradi D, Moaddel D, Nagpal K, Cosgrove JM (2012) The impact of body mass index on outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26(4):964-969
8. Keus F, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJHM (2010) Open, small-incision, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. An overview of Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20(1):CD008318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008318
9. Matovic E, Hasukic S, Ljuca F, Halilovic H (2012) Quality of life in patients after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Med Arh 66(2):97-100
10. Epidemiologia e Ricerca Applicata, Atlante ERA (2009). Le procedure a rischio di inappropriatezza. http://www.atlantesanitario.it/index.php?option= com-content&view=article&id=82&Itemid=93. Accessed 1 Sep 2012
11. Legorreta AP, Silber JH, Costantino GN, Kobylinski RW, Zatz SL (1993) Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JAMA 270(12):1429-1432
12. Pagliarulo M, Fornari F, Fraquelli M, Zoli M, Giangregorio F, Grigolon A, Peracchi M, Conte D (2004) Gallstone disease and related risk factors in a large cohort of diabetic patients. Dig Liver Dis 36(2):130-134
13. European charter on counteracting obesity, EUR/06/5062700/8 16 November 2006 61995 (Original: English)
14. ISTAT (2011) Italia in Cifre. www.istat.it/it/files/2011/06/ italiaincifre2011.pdf. Accessed 1 Sep 2012
15. International Diabetes Federation (2012) Diabetes Atlas 2012 update. International Diabetes Federation, Brussels
16. Csikesz NG, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2008) Trends in surgical management for acute cholecystitis. Surgery 144(2):283-289
17. Sakpal SV, Bindra SS, Chamberlain RS (2010) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion rates two decades later. JSLS 14(4):476-483
18. Dubecz A, Langer M, Stadlhuber RJ, Schweigert M, Solymosi N, Feith M, Stein HJ (2012) Cholecystectomy in the very elderly: is 90 the new 70? J Gastrointest Surg 16(2):282-285
19. Tucker JJ, Yanagawa F, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V (2011) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe but underused in the elderly. Am Surg 77(8):1014-1020
20. Kuwabara K, Matsuda S, Fushimi K, Ishikawa KB, Horiguchi H, Fujimori K (2011) Relationships of age, cholecystectomy approach and timing with the surgical and functional outcomes of elderly patients with cholecystitis. Int J Surg 9(5):392-399
21. Kuwabara K, Matsuda S, Ishikawa KB, Horiguchi H, Fujimori K (2010) Comparative quality of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in the elderly using propensity score matching analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2010:490147
22. Tagle FM, Lavergne J, Barkin JS, Unger SW (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly. Surg Endosc 11(6):636-638
23. Zacks SL, Sandler RS, Rutledge R, Brown RS Jr (2002) A population-based cohort study comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 97(2):334-340
24. Purkayastha S, Tilney HS, Georgiou P, Athanasiou T, Tekkis PP, Darzi AW (2007) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomised control trials. Surg Endosc 21(8):1294-1300
25. Dipartimento della Programmazione e dell'Ordinamento del Servizio Sanitario Nazionale Dir. Gen. della Programmazione sanitaria Ufficio VI. Rapporto annuale sull''attività di ricovero ospedaliero. Dati SDO 2010
26. D Keus F, de Jonge T, Gooszen HG, Buskens E, van Laarhoven CJ (2009) Cost-minimization analysis in a blind randomized trial on small-incision versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy from a societal perspective: sick leave outweighs efforts in hospital savings. Trials 10:80. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-80
27. Secco GB, Cataletti M, Bonfante P, Baldi E, Davini MD, Biasotti B, Ravera G, Ferraris R (2002) Laparoscopic versus mini-cholecystectomy: analysis of hospital costs and social costs in a prospective randomized study. Chir Ital 54(5):685-692
28. Shea JA, Healey MJ, Berlin JA, Clarke JR, Malet PF, Staroscik RN, Schwartz JS, Williams SV (1996) Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis. Ann Surg 224(5):609-620
29. Richards C, Edwards J, Culver D, Emori TG, Tolson J, Gaynes R, National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2003) Does using a laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy decrease the risk of surgical site infection? Ann Surg 237(3):3
30. Hannan EL, Imperato PJ, Nenner RP, Starr H (1999) Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in New York State: mortality, complications, and choice of procedure. Surgery 125(2):223-231
31. Wiseman JT, Sharuk MN, Singla A, Cahan M, Litwin DE, Tseng JF, Shah SA (2010) Surgical management of acute cholecystitis at a tertiary care center in the modern era. Arch Surg 145(5):439-444. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.54.58-62
32. Donabedian A (1998) The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA 260(12):1743-1748
33. Thomas EJ, Petersen L (2003) Measuring errors and adverse events in health care. J Gen Intern Med 18(1):61-67
34. Ospedalizzazione e Mobilità in Veneto: le Dimissioni Ospedaliere negli Anni 2000-2010 a cura di: Servizio Epidemiologico Regionale; Servizio Controllo Investimenti Prezzi Acquisti SSR. www.ser-veneto.it
35. Jurek AM, Greenland S, Maldonado G, Church TR (2005) Proper interpretation of non-differential misclassification effects: expectations vs observations. Int J Epidemiol 34(3):680-687