Tissue acquisition in gastric epithelial tumor prior to endoscopic resection

Clinical Endoscopy

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 436-440

  Kim, Chan Gyoo ^a  

^a National Cancer Center   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Endoscopic resection; Forceps biopsy; Histologic discrepancy; Ulcer

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885031320     PISSN: 22342400     EISSN: 22342443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5946/ce.2013.46.5.436     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Cho SJ, Choi IJ, Kim CG, et al. Risk of high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in gastric biopsy-proven low-grade dysplasia: an analysis using the Vienna classification. Endoscopy 2011;43:465-471.
2. Lee CK, Chung IK, Lee SH, et al. Is endoscopic forceps biopsy enough for a definitive diagnosis of gastric epithelial neoplasia? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;25:1507-1513.
3. Sung HY, Cheung DY, Cho SH, et al. Polyps in the gastrointestinal tract: discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsies and resected specimens. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;21:190-195.
4. Lee SB, Kang HY, Kim KI, Ahn DH. The diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic biopsy for gastric dysplasia. J Gastric Cancer 2010;10:175-181.
5. Jung MK, Jeon SW, Park SY, et al. Endoscopic characteristics of gastric adenomas suggesting carcinomatous transformation. Surg Endose 2008; 22:2705-2711.
6. Nam KW, Song KS, Lee HY et al. Spectrum of final pathological diagnosis of gastric adenoma after endoscopic resection. World J Gastroen-terol 2011;17:5177-5183.
7. Takao M, Kakushima N, Takizawa K, et al. Discrepancies in histologic diagnoses of early gastric cancer between biopsy and endoscopic mu-cosal resection specimens. Gastric Cancer 2012;15:91-96.
8. Kim JH, Kim SH, Park WH, et al. Predictable factors of histologic discrepancy of gastric cancer between the endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic treatment specimen. Korean J Gastroenterol 2012;59:354-359.
9. Yoon WJ, Lee DH, Jung YJ, et al. Histologic characteristics of gastric polyps in Korea: emphasis on discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimen. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:4029-4032.
10. Graham DY, Schwartz JX, Cain GD, Gyorkey E, Prospective evaluation of biopsy number in the diagnosis of esophageal and gastric carcinoma. Gastroenterology 1982;82:228-231.
11. Faigel DO, Eisen GM, Baron XH, et al. Xissue sampling and analysis. Gastrointest Endose 2003;57:811-816.
12. hnita K, Isomoto H, Yamaguchi N, et al. Factors related to the curability of early gastric cancer with endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg En-dose 2009;23:2713-2719.
13. Oka S, Xanaka S, Kaneko I, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual/local recurrence of early gastric cancer after endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy 2006;38:996-1000.
14. Gotoda X Yanagisawa A, Sasako M, et al. Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers. Gastric Cancer 2000;3:219-225.
15. Han KS, Sohn DK, Choi DH, et al. Prolongation of the period between biopsy and EMR can influence the nonlifting sign in endoscopically re-sectable colorectal cancers. Gastrointest Endose 2008;67:97-102.
16. Uno Y, Munakata A. Xhe non-lifting sign of invasive colon cancer. Gastrointest Endose 1994;40:485-489.
17. Kobayashi N, Saito Y, Matsuda X, Fu KI. False-positive nonlifting sign. Gastrointest Endose 2008;68:408.
18. Sheen E, Xriadafilopoulos G. Adverse effects of long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy. Dig Dis Sci 2011;56:931-950