Evaluating U.S. Medical Schools' Efforts to Educate Faculty Researchers on Research Integrity and Research Misconduct Policies and Procedures

Accountability in Research

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 9-25

  Titus, Sandra Larsen ^a  

^a U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES   (United States)

Author keywords

ethical behavior; fabrication; falsification; institutional responsibilities; plagiarism; research integrity; research misconduct

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EDUCATION; ETHICS; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SCHOOL; PERSONNEL; POLICY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; UNITED STATES;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; FACULTY, MEDICAL; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; POLICY; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84885030152     PISSN: 08989621     EISSN: 15455815     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2013.822264     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Bonito, A. 2010. Final Report to ORI on Evaluating the Effectiveness of Institutional Efforts to Educate Staff on their Policies for Dealing with Research Misconduct and Research Integrity (contract #233020090)
2. Bonito, A., Titus, S. L., Greene, A., Amoozegar, J., Eicheldinger, C. and Wright, D. E. 2012. Preparing Whistleblowers for Reporting Research Misconduct. Accountability in Research, 19 (5): 308 - 328.
3. National Academy of Sciences.2002Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment that Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10430 (http://http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10430) (Accessed: 5 August 2013).
4. National Academy of Sciences.1989aThe Responsible Conduct of Research in the Health Sciences. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309047315 (http://http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309047315) (Accessed: 5 August 2013).
5. National Academy of Sciences.2009On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research. IOM Report. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12192#toc (http://http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12192#toc) (Accessed: 5 August 2013).
6. NIH. (2012). NIH Budget http://www.nih.gov/about/budget.htm (http://http://www.nih.gov/about/budget.htm) (Accessed: 2 June 2013).
7. Public Health Service (PHS). (2005). Policies on Research Misconduct - 42 CFR Part 93 - (June 2005) Federal Register. Rules and Regulations. May 17, 2005. Volume 70, Number 94. http://ori.hhs.gov/statutes-regulations (http://http://ori.hhs.gov/statutes-regulations) (Accessed: 30 August 2012).
8. Ryan, K. J.1995Report of the Commission on Research Integrity. Integrity and Misconduct in Research. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://ori.hhs.gov/images/ddblock/report_commission.pdf (http://http://ori.hhs.gov/images/ddblock/report_commission.pdf) (Accessed: 15 May 2013).
9. Ripley, E., Markowitz, M., Nichols-Casebolt, A., Williams, L. and Macrina, F. 2012. Guiding the next generation of NIH investigators in responsible conduct of research: The role of the mentor. Accountability in Research, 19 (4): 209 - 219.
10. Titus, S. L., Wells, J. A., Rhoades, L. J.2008Repairing research integrity. Nature 453980-982. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18563131 (http://http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18563131) (Accessed: 15 May 2013).
11. Titus, S.Ballou, J.2013Development of responsible conduct of research behaviors: Who's responsible? Sci. Eng. Ethics 18. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23686393 (http://http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23686393) (Accessed: 5 August 2013).