Semantic web for the humanities

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7882 LNCS, Issue , 2013, Pages 645-649

  Meroño Peñuela, Albert ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Concept Drift; Contexts; Formats; Semantic Web

Indexed keywords

BIG DATA;

CONCEPT DRIFTS; CONTEXTS; CONTEXTUAL KNOWLEDGE; FORMATS; INTEGRATED APPROACH; LINKED DATA PRINCIPLES; LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS; RESEARCH PROPOSALS;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 84885013134     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38288-8_44     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Carroll, J.J.: Signing RDF Graphs. Tech. Rep. HPL-2003-142, HP Lab (2003)
2. Fanizzi, N., d'Amato, C., Esposito, F.: Conceptual Clustering and Its Application to Concept Drift and Novelty Detection. In: Bechhofer, S., Hauswirth, M., Hoffmann, J., Koubarakis, M. (eds.) ESWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5021, pp. 318-332. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
3. Gonçalves, R.S., Parsia, B., Sattler, U.: Analysing multiple versions of an ontology: A study of the NCI Thesaurus. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Workshop on Description Logics, DL 2011 (2011), http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-745/
4. Guha, R., McCool, R., Fikes, R.: Contexts for the Semantic Web. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 32-46. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
5. Gulla, J.A., et al.: Semantic Drift in Ontologies. In: Filipe, J., Cordeiro, J. (eds.) WEBIST 2010, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, pp. 13-20. INSTICC Press (2010)
6. Han, L., Parr, C., Sachs, J., Joshi, A.: RDF123: a mechanism to transform spreadsheets to RDF. Tech. rep., University of Maryland, Baltimore County (2007)
7. Korotkiy, M., Top, J.L.: From Relational Data to RDFS Models. In: Koch, N., Fraternali, P., Wirsing, M. (eds.) ICWE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3140, pp. 430-434. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
8. Krisnadhi, A., Maier, F., Hitzler, P.: OWL and rules. In: Polleres, A., d'Amato, C., Arenas, M., Handschuh, S., Kroner, P., Ossowski, S., Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2011. LNCS, vol. 6848, pp. 382-415. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
9. Kuukkanen, J.M.: Making Sense of Conceptual Change. History and Theory 47, 351-372 (2008)
10. Meroño-Peñuela, A., et al.: Linked humanities data: The next frontier? A casestudy in historical census data. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Linked Science (LISC 2012). International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC (2012), http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-951/
11. Peñaloza, R., Baader, F., Knechtel, M.: Context-Dependent Views to Axioms and Consequences of Semantic Web Ontologies. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 12 (2012)
12. Ramanujam, S., et al.: R2D: Extracting Relational Structure from RDF Stores. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, WI-IAT 2009, vol. 01, pp. 361-366. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2009)
13. Sequeda, J.F., Arenas, M., Miranker, D.P.: On directly mapping relational databases to RDF and OWL. In: Proceedings of the 21st World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2012, pp. 649-658. ACM, New York (2012)
14. Wang, S., Schlobach, S., Klein, M.: What Is Concept Drift and How to Measure It? In: Cimiano, P., Pinto, H.S. (eds.) EKAW 2010. LNCS, vol. 6317, pp. 241-256. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)