Online audit and feedback improve fetal second-trimester four-chamber view images: A randomised controlled trial

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 33, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 959-964

  Jaudi, Suha ^a,b   Granger, Benjamin ^a   Herpin, Claire Nguyen ^a   Fries, Nicolas ^b   Du Montcel, Sophie Tezenas ^a   Dommergues, Marc ^a,b  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b Collège Français d'Echographie Foetale ^*  (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS MONITORING; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL EDUCATION; ONLINE SYSTEM; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARAMEDICAL PERSONNEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SCREENING; SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; MIDWIFERY; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PHYSICIANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, SECOND; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 84884986538     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4173     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 2012; Issue 6. Art. No.: CD000259. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3.
2. AIUM.org: AIUM Ultrasound Practice Accreditation. http://www.aium.org/accreditation/accreditation.aspx [18 February 2013].
3. Fetalmedicine.com: The Fetal Medicine Foundation Training & Certification http://www.fetalmedicine.com/fmf/training-certification/certificates-of-competence/ [18 February 2013].
4. CFEF.org: Collège Français d'Echographie Foetale F.M.C. E.P.P. https://www.epp-echofoetale.fr/ [18 February 2013].
5. SFAPE.com: Société Française pour l'Amélioration des Pratiques Echographiques 2ème trimestre/3ème trimestre Analyse d'images. http://www.sfape.com/ [18 February 2013].
6. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM Practice Guideline for the performance of an antepartum obstetric ultrasound examination. J Ultrasound Med. 2010 Jan;29(1):157-66.
7. Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V, et al. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37(1):116-26.
8. International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. Cardiac screening examination of the fetus: guidelines for performing the 'basic' and 'extended basic' cardiac scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:107-13.
9. Dommergues M, Bessis R, Henrion R. [Report of the French Comite national technique de l'echographie de depistage prenatal (prenatal ultrasound): what are the practical consequences?]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2006;34:1090-5.
10. RCOG.org.uk: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Guidelines. Ultrasound screening. http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/clinical-guidance/ultrasound-screening [18 February 2013].
11. Ladocumentationfrancaise.fr : Sureau C, Henrion R. Rapport du Comité National Technique de l'Echographie de Dépistage Prénatal 2005 http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/rapports-publics/054000356/index.shtml [18 February 2013].
12. Jaudi S, Du Montcel ST, Fries N, et al. Online evaluation of fetal second-trimester four-chamber view images: a comparison of six evaluation methods. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38(2):185-90.
13. Salomon LJ, Winer N, Bernard JP, Ville Y. A score-based method for quality control of fetal images at routine second trimester ultrasound examination. Prenat Diagn 2008;28:822-7.
14. Sairam S, Awadh AMA, Cook K, et al. Impact of audit of routine second-trimester cardiac images using a novel image scoring method. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:545-51.
15. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, et al. Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Dec;15(6):433-6.