Knowledge, risk, and policy support: Public perceptions of nuclear power

Energy Policy

Volumn 62, Issue , 2013, Pages 176-184

  Stoutenborough, James W ^a   Sturgess, Shelbi G ^b   Vedlitz, Arnold ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Nuclear energy; Public opinion; Risk

Indexed keywords

FOSSIL FUEL TECHNOLOGIES; FUKUSHIMA; POLICY SUPPORT; PUBLIC OPINIONS; PUBLIC PERCEPTION; PUBLIC SUPPORT; SAFETY REGULATIONS;

NUCLEAR ENERGY; NUCLEAR INDUSTRY; RISKS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

RISK PERCEPTION;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; ENERGY RESOURCE; KNOWLEDGE; NUCLEAR POWER; RISK PERCEPTION;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84884980665     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.098     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Baumgartner F.R., Jones B.D. Agendas and Instability in American Politics 1993, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
2. Besley T., Burgess R. The political economy of government responsiveness: Theory and evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 2002, 117(4):1415-1451.
3. Bies, Lee, Lindsey, Stoutenborough, Vedlitz, Citizens, nonprofits and climate change policy, Nonprofit Policy Forum, in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/npf-2012-0001.
4. Churchland P.S., Sejnowski T.J. The Computational Brain 1994, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Cohen P.J. Medical marijuana, compassionate use, and public policy: expert opinion or VoxPopuli?. The Hastings Center Report 2006, 36(3):19-22.
6. Colby B.G. Cap-and trade policy challenges: a tale of three markets. Land Economics 2000, 76(4):638-658.
7. Committee on Transportation of Radioactive Waste, National Research Council Going the Distance? The Safe Transport of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in the United States 2006, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
8. Dake K. Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk: an analysis of contemporary worldviews and cultural biases. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1991, 22(1):61-82.
9. Delli Carpini M.X., Keeter S. What Americans Know about Politics and Why it Matters 1996, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
10. Doan A.E., Kirkpatrick K.J. Giving girls a shot: an examination of mandatory vaccination legislation. Policy Studies Journal 2013, 41(2):295-318.
11. Fischhoff B.P., Slovic P., Lichtenstein S., Read S., Combs B. How safe is safe enough: a psychometric study of attitudes toward technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences 1978, 9(1):121-136.
12. Hansen J., Holm L., Frewer L., Robinson P., Sandøe P. Beyond the knowledge deficit: recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks. Appetite 2003, 41(2):111-121.
13. Harvey, F., 2011. Nuclear is the Safest Form of Power, Says Top UK Scientist. Guardian, March 29. Available: [accessed February 21, 2013]. http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/mar/29/nuclear-power-safe-sir-david-king.
14. Heffern, R., 2011. Environmentalists Divided on Role of Nuclear Power for World's Energy Needs. National Catholic Reporter,47(12), 6.
15. Helman, C., 2012. Nuke us: The Town that Wants America's Worst Atomic Waste. Forbes, January 25. Available: [accessed March 11, 2013]. http://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2012/01/25/nuke-us-meet-the-town-that-wants-americas-worst-nuclear-waste/.
16. Hmelo-Silver C.E. Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn?. Educational Psychology Review 2004, 16(3):235-266.
17. Hollander D. Many pediatricians are reluctant to vaccinate young females against human papillomavirus. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 2007, 39(2):121-122.
18. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2001.Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2001. Cambridge University Press, New York.
19. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007.Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007. Cambridge University Press, New York.
20. Keeler A.G. State greenhouse gas reduction policies: a move in the right direction?. Policy Sciences 2007, 40(4):353-365.
21. Kellstedt P.M., Zahran S., Vedlitz A. Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Analysis 2008, 28(1):113-126.
22. Leiserowitz A. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change 2006, 77(1):45-72.
23. Li H., Jenkins-Smith H.C., Silva C.L., Berrens R.P., Herron K.G. Public support for reducing US reliance on fossil fuels: investigating household willingness-to-pay for energy research and development. Ecological Economics 2009, 68(3):731-742.
24. Lipsmeyer C.S. Welfare and the discriminating public: evaluating entitlement attitudes in post-communist Europe. Policy Studies Journal 2003, 31(4):545-564.
25. Long J.S. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables 1997, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
26. Lovley, E., 2008, January 31. Environmentalists Divided on Nuclear Power. Politico. (January 20, 2013). http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0108/8239.html.
27. Lowi T. The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States 1979, W.W. Norton & Co., New York.
28. Lubell M. Environmental activism as collective action. Environment and Behavior 2002, 34(4):431.
29. Lubell M., Vedlitz A., Zahran S., Alston L.T. Collective action, environmental activism, and air quality policy. Political Research Quarterly 2006, 59(1):149-160.
30. Lubell M., Zahran S., Vedlitz A. Collective action and citizen responses to global warming. Political Behavior 2007, 29(3):391-413.
31. Lupia A., McCubbins M.D. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? 1998, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
32. Macalister, T., Carter, H., 2009, May 12. Britain's Farmers Still Restricted by Chernobyl Nuclear Fallout. Guardian. (January 20, 2013). http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/may/12/farmers-restricted-chernobyl-disaster.
33. McKelvey R.D., Zavoina W. A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1975, 4(1):103-120.
34. McKie, R., 2011, March 26. Chernobyl 25 years on: A Poisoned Landscape. Guardian. (January 20, 2013). http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/27/chernobyl-disaster-anniversary-japan.
35. Mumpower, J.L., Shi, L., Stoutenborough, J. W., Vedlitz, A. Psychometric and demographic predictors of the perceived risk of terrorism threats and the willingness-to-pay for risk management programs. Risk Analysis, in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/risa.12033.
36. Nakamura A., Kikuchi M. What we know, and what we have not yet learned: triple disasters and the Fukushima nuclear fiasco in Japan. Public Administration Review 2011, 71(6):893-899.
37. North American Electricity Reliability Council 2006 Long-Term Reliability Assessment: The Reliability of the Bulk Power Systems in North America 2006, North American Electricity Reliability Council, Princeton, NJ.
38. Olson M. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups 1965, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
39. Ostrom E. Institutional rational choice: an assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. Theories of the Policy Process 2007, Westview Press, Boulder, CO. second ed. P.A. Sabatier (Ed.).
40. Ostrom V. The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration 2007, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa. third ed.
41. Pereira J.A., Van Ryzin G.G. Understanding public support for time limits and other welfare reforms. Policy Studies Journal 1998, 26(3):398-418.
42. Peters E., Slovic P. The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1996, 26(16):1427-1453.
43. Robinson S.E., Liu X., Stoutenborough J.W., Vedlitz A. Explaining popular trust in the Department of Homeland Security. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2013, 23(3):713-731.
44. Sabatier P.A., Weible C.M. The advocacy coalition framework: innovations and clarifications. Theories of the Policy Process 2007, Westview Press, Boulder, CO. second ed. P.A. Sabatier (Ed.).
45. Sapolsky H.M. Science, voters, and the fluoridation controversy: conflict among perceived experts leads voters to act negatively on the fluoridation innovation. Science 1968, 162(3852):427-433.
46. Schumpeter J. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy 1942, Harper, New York.
47. Sears D.O., Lau R.R., Tyler T.T., Allen H.M. Self-interest vs. symbolic politics in policy attitudes and presidential voting. The American Political Science Review 1980, 74(3):670-684.
48. Simon H.A. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization 1965, Free Press, New York, Originally published in 1947.
49. Simon H.A. Theories of bounded rationality. Decision and Organization: A Volume in Honor of Jacob Marschak 1972, 161-176. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam. C.B. McGuire, R. Radner (Eds.).
50. Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science 1987, 236(4799):280-285.
51. Slovic P. Perception of risk from radiation. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 1996, 68(3/4):165-180.
52. Slovic P. The Perception of Risk 2000, Earthscan, London.
53. Steel B.S., Warner R.L., Lach D. Gender differences in support for scientific involvement in U.S. environmental policy. Science Technology & Human Values 2010, 35(2):147-173.
54. Stern P.C., Dietz T., Abel T., Guagnano G.A., Kalof L. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review 1999, 6(2):81-97.
55. Stoutenborough, J.W., Vedlitz A., 2012. Public Opinion and Climate-related Policy Solutions: A Comparison of the Policy Preferences of the Public, Stakeholders, and Climate Scientists. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
56. Stoutenborough J.W., Vedlitz A., Xing X., 2013. Are all risk perceptions created equal? Comparing general risk assessments and specific risk assessments associated with climate change. ISTPP Working Papers, http://bush.tamu.edu/istpp/scholarship/workingpapers/.
57. Timberlake J.M., Lock E.D., Risinski K.A. How should we wage the war on drugs? Determinants of public preferences for drug control alternatives. Policy Studies Journal 2003, 31(1):71-88.
58. Timm C.M., Fox J.V. Could WIPP replace Yucca Mountain?. Nuclear Engineering International 2011, 11:2013. Available:.
59. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2013. Inventory of U.S. Green House Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2011. Available: [accessed March 5, 2013]. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/ghgemissions/US-GHG-Inventory-2011.pdf.
60. Wildavsky A., Dake K. Theories of risk perception: who fears what and why?. Daedalus 1990, 119(4):41-60.
61. Williams R. Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. Stata Journal 2006, 6(1):58-82.