Validation of the Swedish version of the clinical outcomes in routine evaluation outcome measure (CORE-OM)

Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 447-455

  Elfstrom M L ^a   Evans, C ^b   Lundgren, J ^c,d   Johansson, B ^c   Hakeberg, M ^d   Carlsson, S G ^c  

^a MÄLARDALEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b NOTTINGHAMSHIRE HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

CORE OM; Outcome measure; Transcultural psychology; Validation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CORE-OM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME MEASURE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF REPORT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STANDARD; SWEDEN; TRANSCULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY; VALIDATION; VALIDATION STUDY; YOUNG ADULT;

CORE-OM; OUTCOME MEASURE; TRANSCULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY; VALIDATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF REPORT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SWEDEN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84884980055     PISSN: 10633995     EISSN: 10990879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cpp.1788     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Barkham, M., Culverwell, A., Spindler, K., & Twigg, E. (2005). The CORE-OM in an older adult population: Psychometric status, acceptability and feasibility. Aging & Mental Health, 9, 235-245.
2. Barkham, M., Evans, C., Margison, F., McGrath, G., Mellor-Clark, J., Milne, D.& Connell, J. (1998). The rationale for developing and implementing core outcome batteries for routine use in service settings and psychotherapy outcome research. Journal of Mental Health, 7, 35-47.
3. Barkham, M., Margison, F., Leach, C., Lucock, M., Mellor-Clark, J., Evans, C., Benson, L., Connell, J.& Audin, K. (2001). Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: Toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 184-196.
4. Barkham, M., Mellor-Clark, J., Connell, J., & Cahill, J. (2006). A core approach to practice-based evidence: A brief history of the origins and applications of the CORE-OM and CORE system. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 6, 3-15.
5. Bedford, A., Watson, R., Lyne, J., Tibbles, J., Davies, F., & Deary, I. J. (2010). Mokken scaling and principal components analyses of the CORE-OM in a large clinical sample. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 17, 51-62.
6. Connell, J., Barkham, M., Stiles, W. B., Twigg, E., Singleton, N., Evans, O.& Miles, J. N. V. (2007). Distribution of CORE-OM scores in a general population, clinical cut-off points and comparison with the CIS-R. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 190, 69-74.
7. Derogatis, L. R. (1994). SCL-90-R - Symptom Checklist-90-R. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
8. Derogatis, L. R., & Cleary, P. A. (1977). Confirmation of the dimensional structure of the SCL-90: A study in construct validation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 981-989.
9. Derogatis, L. R., & Fitzpatrick, M. (2004). The SCL-90-R, the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), and the BSI-18. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment: Volume 3: Instruments for adults (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Durham, C. J., McGrath, L. D., Burlingame, G. M., Schaalje, G. B., Lambert, M. J., & Davies, D. R.(2002). The effects of repeated administrations on self-report and parent-report scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 240-257.
11. Evans, C., Connell, J., Barkham, M., Margison, F., McGrath, G., Mellor-Clark, J.& Audin, K. (2002). Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: Psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 51-60.
12. Evans, C., Mellor-Clark, J., Margison, F., Barkham, M., Audin, K., Connell, J.& McGrath, G. (2000). CORE: Clinical outcomes in routine evaluation. Journal of Mental Health, 9, 247-255.
13. Goldberg, D. P. (1972). The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
14. Goldberg, D. P., & Williams, P. A. (1988). User's guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFERNelson.
15. Howard, K. I., Lueger, R. J., Maling, M., & Martinovich, Z. (1993). A phase model of psychotherapy: Causal mediation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 678-685.
16. Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19.
17. Lambert, M. J., Burlingame, G. M., Umphress, V., Hansen, N. B., Vermeersch, D. A., Clouse, G. C.& Yanchar, S. C. (1996). The reliability and validity of the Outcome Questionnaire. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 3, 249-258.
18. Lambert, M. J., Morton, J. J., Hatfield, D., Harmon, C., Hamilton, S., Reid, R. C., Shimokawa, K., Christopherson, C.& Burlingame, G. B. (2004). Administration and scoring manual for the OQ-45. Orem, UT: American Professional Credentialing Services.
19. Lyne, K. J., Barret, P., Evans, C., & Barkham, M. (2006). Dimensions of variation on the CORE-OM. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 185-203.
20. Palmieri, G., Evans, C., Hansen, V., Brancaleoni, G., Ferrari, S., Procelli, P., Reitano, F.& Rigatelli, M. (2009). Validation of the Italian version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM). Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 16, 444-449.
21. Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment. (2005). Behandling av ångestsyndrom, volym 1. En systematisk litteraturöversikt [Treatment of anxiety disorders, volume 1. A systematic literature review]. Stockholm, Sweden: Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering (SBU).
22. Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361-370.