Evaluation of the long-term power generation mix: The case study of south korea's energy policy

Energy Policy

Volumn 62, Issue , 2013, Pages 1544-1552

  Min, Daiki ^a   Chung, Jaewoo ^b  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

^b Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Conditional value at risk; Portfolio model; Power generations mix

Indexed keywords

COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS; CONDITIONAL VALUE-AT-RISK; CVAR (CONDITIONAL VALUE AT RISK); ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE; ELECTRICITY DEMANDS; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION TECHNIQUE; PORTFOLIO MODEL; POWER GENERATION MIX;

COSTS; ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION; MONTE CARLO METHODS; NUCLEAR ENERGY; VALUE ENGINEERING;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ENERGY POLICY; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR POWER; POWER GENERATION; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; TRADE-OFF; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

SOUTH KOREA;

EID: 84884974871     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.104     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Asche F., Oglend A., Osmundsen P. Gas versus oil prices the impact of shale gas. Energy Policy 2012, 47:117-124.
2. Awerbuch, S., Berger, M., 2003. Applying Portfolio Theory to EU Electricity Planning and Policy Making. IEA/EET Working Paper.
3. Bar-Lev D., Katz S. A portfolio approach to fossil fuel procurement in the electric utility industry. The Journal of Finance 1976, 31(3):933-947.
4. Bhattacharya A., Kojima S. Power sector investment risk and renewable energy. a Japanese case study using portfolio risk optimization method. Energy Policy 2012, 40:69-80.
5. Birge J.R., Louveaux F. Introduction to Stochastic Programming 1997, Springer, New York.
6. Cranoski D. Japan rethinks its energy policy. Nature 2011, 473:263.
7. Davis, L.L., 2011. Beyond Fukushima: disasters, nuclear energy, and energy law. Brigham Young University Law Review 2011, 1937-1989.
8. Deng S., Xu L. Mean-risk efficient portfolio analysis of demand response and supply resources. Energy 2009, 34:1523-1529.
9. Denton M., Palmer A., Masiello R., Skantze P. Managing market risk in energy. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2003, 18(2):494-502.
10. Deutch, J.M., Forsberg, C.W., Kadak, A.C., Kazimi, M.S., Moniz, E.J., Parsons, J.E., Du, Y., Pierpoint, L., 2009. Future of Nuclear Power: Update of the MIT 2003. MIT Energy Initiative 2009.
11. Doege J., Schiltknecht P., Luthi H.-J. Risk management of power portfolios and valuation of flexibility. OR Spectrum 2006, 28:267-287.
12. Eydeland A., Wolyniec K. Energy and Power Risk Management 2003, John Wiley & Sons, NJ.
13. Fang Y., Chen L., Fukushima M. A mixed R&D project and securities portfolio selection model. European Journal of Operational Research 2008, 185:700-715.
14. Feng Y., Ryan S.M. Scenario construction and reduction applied to stochastic power generation expansion planning. Computers and Operations Research 2013, 40(1):9-23.
15. Gotham D., Muthuraman K., Preckel P., Rardin R., Ruangpattana S. A load factor based mean-variance analysis for fuel diversification. Energy Economics 2009, 31(2):249-256.
16. Grunwald M. The real cost of nuclear power. Time 2011, 3.
17. Guastaroba G., Mansini R., Speranza M.G. On the effectiveness of scenario generation techniques in single-period portfolio optimization. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 192:500-511.
18. Gurgur C., Newes E.K. Conditional value-at-risk constrained optimisation of a power portfolio. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences 2011, 4(3):230-246.
19. Høyland K., Wallace S.W. Generating scenario tress for multistage decision problems. Management Science 2001, 47:295-307.
20. Huang Y., Wu J. A portfolio risk analysis on electricity supply planning. Energy Policy 2008, 36:627-641.
21. IAEA. IAEA Annual Report 2011. International Atomic Energy Agency.
22. Jansen, J.C., Beurskens, L.W.M., Tilburg, X.V., 2006. Application of Portfolio Analysis to the Dutch Generating Mix. Working Paper, Energy Research Council of Netherlands.
23. Jin S., Ryan S.M., Watson J., Woodruff D.L. Modeling and solving a large-scale generation expansion planning problem under uncertainty. Energy Systems 2011, 2:209-242.
24. Kleindorfer P., Li L. Multi-period var-constrained portfolio optimization with applications to the electric power sector. Energy Journal 2005, 26(1):1-26.
25. Kleywegt A.J. The sample average approximation method for stochastic discrete optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization 2001, 12(2):479-502.
26. KMKE, 2010. The 5th Basic Plan for Long-Term Electricity Supply and Demand. Korea Power Exchange, Korea Ministry of Knowledge Economy, 12.
27. Lesser, J., Lowengrub, P., Yang, S., 2007. A Mean-Variance Portfolio Optimization of California's Generation Mix to 2020. Consultant Report, White Bates, LLC.
28. Lim A., Shanthikumar G., Vahn G.Y. Conditional value-at-risk in portfolio optimization. coherent but fragile. Operations Research Letters 2011, 39:163-171.
29. Mak W.K., Mortonand D.P., Wood R.K. Monte carlo bounding techniques for determining solution quality in stochastic programs. Operations Research Letters 1999, 24:47-56.
30. Markowitz H. Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance 1952, 7:77-91.
31. Matsuo, Y., 2012. Summary and Evaluation of Cost Calculation for Nuclear Power Generation by the "Cost Estimation and Review Committee". The Institute of Energy Economics Japan, May 2012.
32. McLoughlin, E., Bazilian, M., 2006. Application of Portfolio Analysis to the Irish Electricity Generating Mix in 2020. Working Paper, Sustainable Energy Ireland.
33. Meng F.W., Sun J., Goh M. Stochastic optimization problems with CVaR risk measure and their sample average approximation. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 2010, 146:399-418.
34. Mirkhani Sh., Saboohi Y. Stochastic modeling of the energy supply system with uncertain fuel price a case of emerging technologies for distributed power generation. Applied Energy 2012, 93:668-674.
35. Rockafellar R.T., Uryasev S. Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. The Journal of Risk 2000, 2(3):21-41.
36. Ruangpattana S., Preckel V.P., Gotham D.J., Muthuraman K., Velastegui M., Morin T.L., Uhan N.A. Diversification of fuel costs accounting for load variation. Energy Policy 2012, 42:400-408.
37. Street A., Barroso L.A., Flach B., Pereira M.V., Granville S. Risk constrained portfolio selection of renewable sources in hydrothermal electricity market. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2009, 24(3):1136-1144.
38. Sun H., Tan Z. Models of risk measurement and control in power generation investment. Systems Engineering Procedia 2012, 3:125-131.
39. van Zon, A., Fuss, S., 2005. Irreversible Investment and Uncertainty in Energy Conversion: A Clay-Clay Vintage Portfolio Selection Approach. Working Paper, University of Maastricht/UNU-MERIT.
40. Vithayasrichareon P., MacGill I.F. A Monte Carlo based decision-support tool for assessing generation portfolios in future carbon constrained electricity industries. Energy Policy 2012, 41:374-392.
41. Wagner, M., Skantze, P., Ilic, M., 2003. Hedging optimization algorithms for deregulated electricity markets. In: Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Intelligent Systems Application to Power Systems, p. 2.
42. Zhang Q., Ishihara K.N., Mclellan B.C., Tezuka T. Scenario analysis on future electricity supply and demand in Japan. Energy 2012, 38(1):376-385.
43. Zhu L., Fan Y. Optimization of China's generating portfolio and policy implications based on portfolio theory. Energy 2010, 35:1391-1402.