Social costs from proximity to hydraulic fracturing in new york state

Energy Policy

Volumn 62, Issue , 2013, Pages 62-69

  Popkin, Jennifer H ^a   Duke, Joshua M ^a   Borchers, Allison M ^b   Ilvento, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Choice experiment; Fracking; Welfare

Indexed keywords

CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; ELECTRIC BILLS; FRACKING; INTERNET SURVEY; NEW YORK STATE; WELFARE; WELFARE ANALYSIS; WELFARE IMPACTS;

COST ACCOUNTING; COSTS; EXPERIMENTS; SHALE;

HYDRAULIC FRACTURING;

ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; EXPERIMENT; HOUSEHOLD ENERGY; HYDRAULIC FRACTURE; NATURAL GAS; SHALE;

NEW YORK [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84884973756     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.080     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adamowicz W., Boxall P., Williams M., Louviere J. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1998, 80:64-75.
2. Alter T., Braiser K., McLaughlin D., Willits F.K. Baseline socioeconomic analysis for the Marcellus Shale development in Pennsylvania. The Institute of Public Policy and Economic Development at Wilkes University 2010, 1-127.
3. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P.R., Leamer, E.E., Radner, R., Schuman, H., 1993. Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. Washington D.C. January 11, 1993.
4. Arthur, J.D., Uretsky, M., Wilson, P., 2009. Water resources and use for hydraulic fracturing in the Marcellus Shale region. National Energy Technology Laboratory, Department of Energy. (accessed January 2010). http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/oil-gas/publications/ENVreports/FE0000797_WaterResourceIssues.pdf.
5. Bech M., Gyrd-Hansen D. Effects coding in discrete choice experiments. Health Economics 2005, 14:1079-1085.
6. Borchers A.M., Duke J.M., Parsons G.R. Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source. Energy Policy 2007, 35:3327-3334.
7. Boxall P.C., Adamowicz W.L., Swait J., Williams M., Louviere J. A Comparison of Stated Preference Methods for Environmental Valuation. Ecological Economics 1996, 18:243-253.
8. Boxall P.C., Chan W.H., McMillan M.L. The impact of oil and natural gas facilities on rural residential property values: a spatial hedonic analysis. Resource and Energy Economics 2005, 27:248-269.
9. Christopherson, S., Rightor, N., 2011. How should we Think about the Economic Consequences of Shale Gas Drilling. Working Paper. Cornell University. http://www.greenchoices.cornell.edu/downloads/development/marcellus/Marcellus_SC_NR.pdf.
10. Damigos D., Tourkolias C., Diakoulaki D. Households' willingness to pay for safeguarding security of natural gas supply in electricity generation. Energy Policy 2009, 37:2008-2017.
11. Gerpott T.J., Ilaha M. Determinants of price mark-up tolerance for green electricity-lessons for environmental marketing strategies from a study of residential electricity customers in Germany. Business Strategy and the Environment 2010, 19:304-318.
12. Hanley N., Wright R.E., Adamowicz V. Using choice experiments to value the environment. Environmental and Resource Economics 1998, 11:413-428.
13. Hensher D.A., Greene W.H. The mixed logit model: the state of practice. Transportation 2003, 30:133-176.
14. Hensher D.A., Rose J.M., Greene W.H. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer 2005, Cambridge University Press, New York.
15. Hu W., Veeman M.M., Adamowicz W.L. Labeling genetically modified food: heterogeneous consumer preferences and the value of information. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 2005, 53:83-102.
16. Kelsey, T.W., Shields, M., Ladlee, J.R., Ward, M., Brundage, T.L., Lorson, J.F., Michael, L.L., Murphy, T.B., 2011. Economic impacts of Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania: employment and income in 2009. Marcellus Shale Education and Training Center. (accessed Jan. 2011). http://marcellus.psu.edu/resources/PDFs/Economic%20Impact%20of%20Marcellus%20Shale%202009.pdf.
17. Northeast Gas Association, 2011. New York. (accessed Apr. 2011). http://www.northeastgas.org/new_york.html.
18. NYS DEC, Department of Environmental Conservation, 2011. Revised draft supplemental generic environmental impact statement on the oil, gas and solution mining regulator program. (accessed Mar. 2011). http://www.dec.ny.gov/data/dmn/rdsgeisfull0911.pdf.
19. NYS GIS Clearinghouse, 2007. NYS County Boundaries. (accessed Feb. 2012). http://gis.ny.gov/gisdata/inventories/details.cfm?DSID=910.
20. Oliver H., Volschenk J., Smit E. Residential consumers in the Cape Peninsula's willingness to pay for premium priced green electricity. Energy Policy 2011, 29:544-550.
21. Poe G.L., Giraud K.L., Loomis J.B. Computational methods for measuring the difference of empirical distributions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2005, 87:353-365.
22. Popkin, J.H., 2012. Willingness to Pay for Electricity from Natural Gas Extracted using Hydraulic Fracturing: Location and Preference Heterogeneity. Master's Thesis. University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, 1-87.
23. Ready R.C., Champ P.A., Lawton J.L. Using respondent uncertainty to mitigate hypothetical bias in a stated choice experiment. Land Economics 2010, 86:363-381.
24. Roe B., Teisl M.F., Levy A., Russell M. US consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity. Energy Policy 2001, 29:917-925.
25. Scarpa R., Willis K. Willingness to pay for renewable energy: primary and discretionary choice of British households' for micro-generation technologies. Energy Economics 2010, 32:129-136.
26. Strauss K., Griffin M.A., Sharon K. Future work selves: how salient hoped-for identities motivate proactive career behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology 2011, (Advanced online publication). 10.1037/a0026423.
27. Susaeta A., Lal P., Alavalapati J., Mercer E. Random preferences towards bioenergy environmental externalities: a case study of woody biomass based electricity in the Southern United States. Energy Economics 2011, 33:1111-1118.
28. U.S. Census Bureau, 2011a. Historical census of housing tables house heating fuel. Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division. http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/census/historic/fuels.html (accessed March 2012).
29. U.S. Census Bureau, 2011b. Historical census of housing tables house heating fuel. Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division. http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/census/historic/fuels.html (accessed March 2012).
30. U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2011. Shale gas and oil plays, North America.(accessed March 2012). http://ftp://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/natural_gas/analysis_publications/maps/maps.htm.
31. U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2012. State electricity profiles 2010. U.S. Department of Energy. (accessed March 2012). http://205.254.135.7/electricity/state/pdf/sep2010.pdf.
32. U.S. EPA, Environmental Protection Agency, 2007. Natural Gas. (accessed Jan. 2011). http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-and-you/affect/natural-gas.html.
33. Weber J.G. The effects of a natural gas boom on employment and income in Colorado, Texas, and Wyoming. Energy Economics 2012, (on-line pre-print).
34. Williamson, J., Kolb, B., 2011. Marcellus natural gas development's effects on housing in Pennsylvania. Williamsport, Pa.: Center for the Study of Community and the Economy (CSCE), Lycoming College.
35. Zografakis N., Sifaki E., Pagalou M., Nikitaki G., Psarakis V., Tsagarakis K.P. Assessment of public acceptance and willingness to pay for renewable energy sources in Crete. Renewable and Sustainable Reviews 2010, 14:1088-1095.