Neural field theory of synaptic metaplasticity with applications to theta burst stimulation

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 340, Issue , 2014, Pages 164-176

  Fung, P K ^a,b   Robinson, P A ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c Center for Integrated Research and Understanding of Sleep   (Australia)

Author keywords

BCM theory; Calcium dependent plasticity; Homeostasis; Synaptic plasticity; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR;

CALCIUM; HOMEOSTASIS; NONLINEARITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLASTICITY;

ARTICLE; ASTROCYTE; CALCIUM CELL LEVEL; CALCIUM CONDUCTANCE; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; LATENT PERIOD; LONG TERM DEPRESSION; LONG TERM POTENTIATION; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; THETA BURST STIMULATION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

BCM THEORY; CALCIUM DEPENDENT PLASTICITY; HOMEOSTASIS; SYNAPTIC PLASTICITY; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

ANIMALS; CALCIUM; HOMEOSTASIS; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; OSCILLOMETRY; RECEPTORS, N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 84884961473     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.09.021     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abbott L.F., Nelson S.B. Synaptic plasticity. taming the beast. Nature Neuroscience 2000, 3:1178-1183.
2. Abraham W.C., Mason-Parker S.E., Bear M.F., Webb S., Tate W.P. Heterosynaptic metaplasticity in the hippocampus in vivo. a BCM-like modifiable threshold for LTP. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2001, 98(19):10924-10929.
3. Basser P.J., Roth B.J. Stimulation of a myelinated nerve axon by electromagnetic induction. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 1991, 29:261-268.
4. Bear M.F. Bidirectional synaptic plasticity. from theory to reality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 2003, 358:649-655.
5. Bienenstock E.L., Cooper L.N., Munro P.W. Theory for the development of neuron selectivity. orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 1982, 2:32-48.
6. Cardenas-Morales L., Nowak D.A., Kammer T., Wolf R.C., Schonfeldt-Lecuona C. Brain Topography 2010, 22:294-306.
7. Castellani G.C., Intrator N., Shouval H., Cooper L.N. Solutions of the BCM learning rule in a network of lateral interacting nonlinear neurons. Network 1999, 10:111-121.
8. Castellani G.C., Quinlan E.M., Cooper L.N., Shouval H.Z. A biophysical model of bidirectional synaptic plasticity. dependence on AMPA and NMDA receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2001, 98(22):12772-12777.
9. de la Fuente I.M., Vadillo F., Perez-Samartin A.L., Perez-Pinilla M.-B., Bidaurrazaga J., Vera-Lopez A. Global self-regulation of the cellular metabolic structure. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e9484.
10. Fung P.K., Haber A.L., Robinson P.A. Neural field theory of large-scale synaptic plasticity in the cerebral cortex. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2013, 318:44-57.
11. Fung P.K., Robinson P.A. Neural field theory of calcium dependent plasticity with applications to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2013, 324:72-83.
12. Gamboa O.L., Antal A., Moliadze V., Paulus W. Simply longer is not better. reversal of theta burst after-effect with prolonged stimulation. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 204:181-187.
13. Gentner R., Wankerl K., Reinsberger C., Zeller D., Classen J. Depression of human corticospinal excitability induced by magnetic theta-burst stimulation. evidence of rapid polarity-reversing metaplasticity. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18:2046-2053.
14. 2+ concentration exploring possible bases for a sliding synaptic modification threshold. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1994, 91:3941-3945.
15. Goldsworthy M.R., Pitcher J.B., Ridding M.C. A comparison of two different continuous theta burst stimulation paradigms applied to the human primary motor cortex. Clinical Neurophysiology 2012, 123:2256-2263.
16. Graupner M., Brunel N. STDP in a bistable synapse model based on CaMKII and associated signaling pathways. PLoS Computational Biology 2007, 3:2299-2323.
17. Graupner M., Brunel N. Mechanisms of induction and maintenance of spike-timing dependent plasticity in biophysical synapse models. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 2010, 4:1-19.
18. Hamada M., Murase N., Hasan A., Balaratnam M., Rothwell J.C. The role of interneuron networks in driving human motor cortical plasticity. Cerebral Cortex 2013, 23:1593-1605.
19. Hebb D.O. The Organization of Behavior. A Neuropsychological Theory 1949, Wiley, New York.
20. Huang Y.Z., Chen R.S., Rothwell J.C., Wen H.Y. The after-effect of human theta burst stimulation is NMDA receptor dependent. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118:1028-1032.
21. Huang Y.-Z., Edwards M.J., Rounis E., Bhatia K.P., Rothwell J.C. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 2005, 45:201-206.
22. Huang Y.-Z., Rothwell J.C., Chen R.-S., Lu C.-S., Chuang W.-L. The theoretical model of theta burst form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology 2011, 122:1011-1018.
23. Huang Y.-Z., Rothwell J.C., Lu C.-S., Chuang W.-L., Lin W.-Y., Chen R.-S. Reversal of plasticity-like effects in the human motor cortex. Journal of Physiology 2010, 588(19):3683-3693.
24. Intrator N., Cooper L.N. Objective function formulation of the BCM theory of visual cortical plasticity. statistical connections, stability conditions. Neural Networks 1992, 5:3-17.
25. Kalantzis G., Shouval H.Z. Structural plasticity can produce metaplasticity. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e8062.
26. Malenka R.C., Bear M.F. LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches. Neuron 2004, 44:5-21.
27. Markram H., Gerstner W., Sjostrom P.J. A history of spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 2011, 3:1-24.
28. Muller J.F.M., Orekhov Y., Liu Y., Ziemann U. Homeostatic plasticity in human motor cortex demonstrated by two consecutive sessions of paired associative stimulation. European Journal of Neuroscience 2007, 25:3461-3468.
29. Nakamura H., Kitagawa H., Kawaguchi Y., Tsuji H. Intracortical facilitation and inhibition after transcranial magnetic stimulation in conscious humans. Journal of Physiology (London) 1997, 498:355-364.
30. Narayanan R., Johnston D. The h current is a candidate mechanism for regulating the sliding modification threshold in a BCM-like synaptic learning rate. Journal of Neurophysiology 2010, 104:1020-1033.
31. Nguyen P.V., Kandel E.R. Brief theta-burst stimulation induces a transcription-dependent late phase of LTP requiring cAMP in area CA1 of the mouse hippocampus. Learning and Memory 1997, 4:230-243.
32. Pape H. Queer current and pacemaker. the hyperpolarization-activated cation current in neurons. Annual Review of Physiology 1996, 58:299-327.
33. Pasti L., Volterra A., Pozzan T., Carmignoto G. Intracellular calcium oscillations in astrocytes. a highly plastic, bidirectional form of communication between neurons and astrocytes in situ. Journal of Neuroscience 1997, 17(20):7817-7830.
34. Philpot B.D., Sekhar A.K., Shouval H.Z., Bear M.F. Visual experience and deprivation bidirectionally modify the composition and function of NMDA receptors in visual cortex. Neuron 2001, 29:157-169.
35. Potter-Nerger M., Fischer S., Mastroeni C., Groppa S., Deuschl G., Volkmann J., Quartarone A., Munchau A., Siebner H. Inducing homeostatic-like plasticity in human motor cortex through converging corticocortical inputs. Journal of Neurophysiology 2009, 102:3180-3190.
36. Robinson P.A. Neural field theory of synaptic plasticity. Journal of Theoretical Biology 2011, 285:156-163.
37. Robinson P.A., Rennie C.J., Rowe D.L., O'Connor S.C., Gordon E. Multiscale brain modelling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 2005, 360:1043-1050.
38. Ridding, M.C., Ziemann, U., 2010. Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non-invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects. Journal of Physiology 588, 2291-2304.
39. Rubin J.E., Gerkin R.C., Bi G.Q., Chow C.C. Calcium time course as a signal for spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Journal of Neurophysiology 2005, 93:2600-2613.
40. Sejnowski T.J. The book of Hebb. Neuron 1999, 24:773-776.
41. Shouval H., Intrator N., Cooper L.N. BCM network develops orientation selectivity and ocular dominance in natural scene environment. Vision Research 1997, 37:3339-3342.
42. Shouval H., Intrator N., Law C.C., Cooper L.N. Effect of binocular cortical misalignment on ocular dominance and orientation selectivity. Neural Computation 1996, 8:1021-1040.
43. Shouval H.Z., Bear M.F., Cooper L.N. A unified model of NMDA receptor-dependent bidirectional synaptic plasticity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2002, 99:10831-10836.
44. Shouval H.Z., Castellani G.C., Blais B.S., Yeung L.C., Cooper L.N. Converging evidence for a simplified biophysical model of synaptic plasticity. Biological Cybernetics 2002, 87:383-391.
45. Stosiek C., Garaschuk O., Holthoff K., Knnoerth A. In vivo two-photon calcium imaging of neuronal networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2003, 100(12):7319-7324.
46. Todd, G., Ridding M.C., 2010. The response to repetitive stimulation of human motor cortex is influenced by the history of synaptic activity. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 28, 459-467.
47. Teo J.T., Swayne O.B., Rothwell J.C. Further evidence for NMDA-dependence of the after-effects of human theta burst stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology 2007, 118:1649-1651.
48. Yeung L.C., Shouval H.Z., Bias B.S., Cooper L.N. Synaptic homeostasis and input selectivity follow from a calcium-dependent plasticity model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2004, 101(41):14943-14948.
49. Ziemann U., Paulus W., Nitsche M.A., Pascual-Leone A., Byblow W., Berardelli A., Siebner H., Classen J., Cohen L.G., Rothwell J.C. Consensus: motor cortex plasticity protocols. Brain Stimulation 2008, 1:164-182.