REDD+ and human rights: Addressing synergies between international regimes

Ecology and Society

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Savaresi, Annalisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Climate change; FLEGT; Forests; Human rights; Nagoya Protocol; REDD+

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FOREST MANAGEMENT; HUMAN RIGHTS; SOCIAL IMPACT; UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE;

EID: 84884957496     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-05549-180305     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Anaya, S. J. 2008. The human rights of indigenous peoples, in light of the New Declaration, and the challenge of making them operative: report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous peoples. UN Doc No. A/HRC/9/9. United Nations Human Rights Council, Geneva, Switzerland.
2. Baastel and Nordic Agency for Development and Ecology (NORDECO). 2011. First program evaluation for the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF): evaluation report. Baastel, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada and NORDECO, Copenhagen, Denmark. [online] URL: http://www.forestcarbonpartnership.orq/fcp/sites/forestcarbonpartnership.orq/files/Documents/PDF/Jun2011/5.%20Final%20FCPFEVALUATIONREPORTJune%2013th.pdf
3. Bavikatte, K., and D. F. Robinson. 2011. Towards a people's history of the law: biocultural jurisprudence and the Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit sharing. Law, Environment and Development 7(1):35. [online] URL: http://www.lead-journal.orq/content/11035.pdf
4. Campese, J., T. Sunderland, T. Greiber, and G. Oviedo, editors. 2009. Rights-based approaches: exploring issues and opportunities for conservation. Center for International Forestry Research and International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bogor, Indonesia and Gland, Switzerland.
5. Caney, S. 2010. Climate change, human rights and moral thresholds. Pages 69-91 in S. Humphreys, editor. Human rights and climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://dx.doi.ora/10.1017/CBO9780511770722.004
6. Chhatre, A., S. Lakhanpal, A. M. Larson, F. Nelson, H. Ojha, and J. Rao. 2012. Social safeguards and co-benefits in REDD+: a review of the adjacent possible. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4:654-660. http://dx.doi.orq/10.1016/i.cosust.2012.08.006
7. ClientEarth and World Resources Institute. 2011. Lessons from International and Regional Instruments. A submission to the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technical Advice (SBSTA). ClientEarth, London, UK and World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.clientearth.orq/reports/submission-redd+safequards-final.pdf
8. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 2009. General Comment No. 21, Right of everyone to take part in cultural life. UN Doc E/C.12/GC/21. United Nations Economic and Social Council, Geneva, Switzerland.
9. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD). 2009. Communication of the committee adopted pursuant to the early warning and urgent action procedures. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Geneva, Switzerland.
10. Convention on Biological Diversity Conference of the Parties (CBD COP). 2012. Decision 11/19. Biodiversity and climate change related issues: advice on the application of relevant safeguards for biodiversity with regard to policy approaches and positive incentives on issues relating to reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries; and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries. Item 11 of the Eleventh Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention to Biological Diversity. UN Doc UNEP/CBD/COP/11/35. Hyderabad, India.
11. Dooley, K., T. Griffiths, F. Martone, and S. Ozinga. 2011. Smoke and mirrors. A critical assessment of the forest carbon partnership facility. FERN and Forest Peoples Programme, Moreton-in-Marsh, UK. [online] URL: http://www.forestpeoples.org/sites/fpp/files/publication/2011/03/smokeandmirrorsinternet.pdf
12. Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF). 2010. Incorporating environmental and social considerations into the process of getting ready for REDD plus. Revised Draft, March 7, 2010. World Bank, Washinqton, D.C., USA.
13. Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FCPF). 2011. Readiness fund: common environmental and social approach among delivery partners. World Bank, Washinqton, D.C., USA.
14. Griffiths T. 2009. Seeing REDD? Forests, climate change mitigation and the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities. Forest Peoples Proqramme, Moreton-in-Marsh, UK. [online] URL: http://www.riqhtsandresources.org/documents/files/doc923.pdf
15. Human Riqhts Council. 2009. Resolution 10/4, Human rights and climate change. UN Doc. A/HRC/10/L. Office of the United Nations Hiqh Commissioner for Human Riqhts, Geneva, Switzerland.
16. Human Riqhts Council. 2011. Analytical study on the relationship between human rights and the environment. Report of the United Nations Hiqh Commissioner for Human Riqhts UN Doc A/HRC/19/34. Office of the United Nations Hiqh Commissioner for Human Riqhts, Geneva, Switzerland.
17. Humphreys, S. 2010. Introduction: human riqhts and climate chanqe. Paqes 1-34 in S. Humphreys, editor. Human rights and climate change. Cambridqe University Press, Cambridqe, UK. http://dx.doi.orq/10.1017/CBO9780511770722.002
18. Humphreys, S. 2012. Climate chanqe and international human riqhts law. Paqes 27-55 in R. G. Rayfuse and S. V. Scott, editors. International law in the era of climate change. Edward Elqar, London, UK.
19. Inter-American Commission on Human Riqhts. 2009. Indigenous and tribal peoples' rights over their ancestral lands and natural resources: norms and Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Human Rights System. OEA/Ser. L/V/l I. Doc. 56/09.orqanization of American States, Washinqton, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://cidh.orq/countryrep/lndiqenous-LandsQ9/T0C.htm
20. International Law Association. 2010. The Hague Conference Report: rights of indigenous peoples. International Law Association, London, UK. [online] URL: http://www.ila-hq.orq/en/committees/index.cfm/cid/1024
21. International Law Commission. 2006. Fragmentation of international law: difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law. Report of the Study Group ofthe International LawCommission. UN DocA/CN.4/L.682. United Nations, Geneva, Switzerland.
22. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). 2008. World Conservation Congress, Resolution 4.056 Rights-based approaches to conservation. Barcelona, Spain.
23. Jaqqer P., K. Lawlor, M. Brockhaus, M. F. Gebara, D. J. Sonwa. Pradnja Resoudarmo. 2012. REDD+ safequards in national policy discourse and pilot projects. Paqes 301-316 in A. Anqelsen, M. Brockhaus, W. D. Sunderlin, and L. V. Verchot, editors. Analysing REDD+: challenges and choices. CIFOR, Boqor, Indonesia.
24. Kelly, D. J. 2010. The case for social safequards in a post-2012 aqreement on REDD. Law, Environment and Developments (1):61. [online] URL: http://www.lead-journal.org/content/10061.pdf
25. Koskenniemi, M. 2010. Human riqhts mainstreaminq as a strateqy for institutional power. Humanity. An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism and Development 1:47-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hum.2010.0003
26. Morqera, E. 2013. No need to reinvent the wheel for a human riqhts-based approach to tacklinq climate chanqe: the contribution of international biodiversity law. Pages 359-390 in E. J. Hollo, K. Kulovesi, and M. Mehlinq, editors. Climate change andthe law: a global perspective. Sprinqer, New York, New York, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5440-914
27. Morqera, E. and E. Tsioumani. 2010. The evolution of benefit-sharinq: linkinq biodiversity and community livelihoods. Review of European Community and International Environmental Zaw 19(2):150-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-9388.2010.00674.X
28. Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharinq of Benefits arisinq from their Utilization to the Convention on Bioloqical Diversity. 2010. UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/1, 29 October. Naqoya, Japan. Not yet into force.
29. Nicholson, S., and D. Chonq. 2011. Jumpinq on the human riqhts bandwaqon: how riqhts-based linkaqes can refocus climate politics. Global Environmental Politics 11:121-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/GLEPa00072
30. Roht-Arriaza, N. 2010 First, do no harm: human riqhts and efforts to combat climate chanqe. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative law 38:593-612.
31. Savaresi, A. 2012b. EU external action on forests: FLEGT and the development of international law. Paqes 149-173 in E. Morqera, editor. 77?e external environmental policy of the European Union: EU and international law perspectives. Cambridqe University Press, Cambridqe, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139152327.010
32. Savaresi A. 2012a. The international human riqhts law implications of the Naqoya Protocol. Paqes 53-81 in E. Morqera, E. Tsioumani, and M. Buck, editors. The 2010 Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit-sharing in perspective: implications for international law and implementation challenges. BRILL, The Haque, The Netherlands.
33. Seymour, F. 2010. Forests, climate chanqe and human riqhts: manaqinq risks and trade-offs. Paqes 207-237 in S. Humphreys, editor. Human rights and climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://dx.doi.orq/10.1017/CBO9780511770722.009
34. Shelton, D. 2009. A rights-based approach to conservation. Pages 5-35 in J. Greiber, editor. Conservation withjustice: a rights-based approach. IUCN Environmental Lawand Policy Paper No. 71, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland and IUCN Environmental Law Centre, Bonn, Germany.
35. Takacs, D. 2010. Forest carbon offsets and international law: a deep equity legal analysis. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 22:521-573.
36. Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA). 2012. Methodological guidance for activities relating to reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries. Draft conclusions proposed by the Chair. UN Doc FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.31. Doha, Qatar.
37. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Conference of the Parties (UNFCCC COP). 2010. Decision 1/CP. 16. The Cancun Agreements. Outcome of the Work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action under the Convention. UN Doc. FCCC/CP/7/Add.1. Cancun, Mexico.
38. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Conference of the Parties (UNFCCC COP). 2011. Decision 2/CP. 17, UNFCCC biennial update reporting guidelines for Parties not included in Annex I to the Convention. U N Doc. FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1. Durban, South Africa.
39. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Conference of the Parties (UNFCCC COP). 2011a. Decision 12/CP17. Guidance on systems for providing information on how safeguards are addressed and respected and modalities relating to forest reference emission levels and forest reference levels as referred to in Decision 1/CP. 16. UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.2. Durban, South Africa.
40. United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII). 2008. Report on the seventh session. UN Doc. E/2008/43. E/C.19/2008/13. UNPFII, New York, New York, USA.
41. UN-REDD Programme. 2012. Social and environmental principles and criteria. UN-REDD Programme, Geneva, Switzerland, [online] URL: http://www.un-redd.org/MultipleBenefitsSEPC/tabid/54130/Default.aspx
42. UN-REDD Programme. 2013a. Guidelines on free, prior and informed consent. UN-REDD Programme, Geneva, Switzerland, [online] URL: http://www.unredd.net/index.php?option=comdocman&task=catview&qid=2648<emid=53
43. UN-REDD Programme. 2013. Legal companion to the UN-REDD Programme Guidelines on free, prior and informed consent. UN-REDD Programme, Geneva, Switzerland, [online] URL: http://www.unredd.net/index.php?option=comdocman&task=catview&qid=2655<emid=53
44. UN Secretary General. 2001. Road map towards the implementation of the United Nations Millennium Declaration. UN Doc. A/56/326. UN Secretary General, New York, New York, USA.
45. Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., C. McDermott, M. J. Vjge, and B. Cashore. 2012. Trade-offs, co-benefits and safeguards: current debates on the breadth of REDD+. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4:646-653. http://dx.doi.orq/10.1016/i.cosust.2012.10.005
46. World Bank. 2005. OP/BP 4.10, Indigenous peoples. World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA [online] URL: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTS/EXTPOLICIES/EXTSAFEPOL/0.contentMDK:20543990-menuPK:1286666-paaePK:64168445~piPK:64168309~theSitePK:584435.00.html
47. World Bank. 2010. Charter establishing the forest carbon partnership facility. International bank for reconstruction and development. World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA.
48. Zarin, D., A. Angelsen, S. Brown, C. Loisel, L. Peskett, and C. Streck. 2009. Reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD): an options assessment. Report Prepared for the Government of Norway, Oslo, Norway, [online] URL: http://www.redd-oar.orq./links/REDD-OARen.pdf