A fully-discrete-state kinetic theory approach to modeling vehicular traffic

SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1533-1556

  Fermo, Luisa ^a   Tosin, Andrea ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAGLIARI   (Italy)

^b CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Generalized kinetic theory; Stochastic games; Traffic granularity; Vehicle interactions

Indexed keywords

FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES; KINETIC MODELS; MATHEMATICAL THEORY; NEW MATHEMATICAL MODEL; REALISTIC SCENARIO; STOCHASTIC GAME; TRAFFIC PHENOMENON; VEHICLE INTERACTIONS;

KINETICS;

KINETIC THEORY;

EID: 84884953282     PISSN: 00361399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/120897110     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. A. Aw and M. Rascle, Resurrection of "second order" models of traffic flow, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 60 (2000), pp. 916-938.
2. N. Bellomo and C. Dogbe, On the modelling of traffic and crowds: A survey of models, speculations, and perspectives, SIAM Rev., 53 (2011), pp. 409-463.
3. A. Bellouquid, E. De Angelis, and L. Fermo, Towards the modeling of vehicular traffic as a complex system: A kinetic theory approach, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 22 (2012), 1140003.
4. F. Berthelin, P. Degond, M. Delitala, and M. Rascle, A model for the formation and evolution of traffic jams, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 187 (2008), pp. 185-220.
5. I. Bonzani and L. Mussone, From experiments to hydrodynamic traffic flow models. I. Modelling and parameter identification, Math. Comput. Modelling, 37 (2003), pp. 1435-1442.
6. R. M. Colombo, Hyperbolic phase transitions in traffic flow, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 63 (2002), pp. 708-721.
7. V. Coscia, M. Delitala, and P. Frasca, On the mathematical theory of vehicular traffic flow. II. Discrete velocity kinetic models, Internat. J. Non-Linear Mech., 42 (2007), pp. 411-421.
8. C. F. Daganzo, The cell transmission model: A dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory, Transp. Res. B-Meth., 28B (1994), pp. 269-287.
9. C. F. Daganzo, In traffic flow, cellular automata = kinematic waves, Transp. Res. B-Meth., 40 (2006), pp. 396-403.
10. E. De Angelis, Nonlinear hydrodynamic models of traffic flow modelling and mathematical problems, Math. Comput. Modelling, 29 (1999), pp. 83-95.
11. M. Delitala and A. Tosin, Mathematical modeling of vehicular traffic: A discrete kinetic theory approach, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 17 (2007), pp. 901-932.
12. A. Deutsch and S. Dormann, Cellular Automaton Modeling of Biological Pattern Formation, Model. Simul. Sci. Eng. Technol., Birkhauser, Boston, 2005.
13. D. C. Gazis, R. Herman, and R. W. Rothery, Nonlinear follow-The-leader models of traffic flow, Oper. Res., 9 (1961), pp. 545-567.
14. D. Helbing, Traffic and related self-driven many-particle systems, Rev. Modern Phys., 73 (2001), pp. 1067-1141.
15. B. S. Kerner, The Physics of Traffic, Springer, Berlin, 2004.
16. M. J. Lighthill and G. B. Whitham, On kinematic waves. II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads, Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A., 229 (1955), pp. 317-345.
17. P. I. Richards, Shock waves on the highway, Oper. Res., 4 (1956), pp. 42-51.
18. A. Tosin, From generalized kinetic theory to discrete velocity modeling of vehicular traffic. A stochastic game approach, Appl. Math. Lett., 22 (2009), pp. 1122-1125.
19. M. Treiber, A. Kesting, and D. Helbing, Delays, inaccuracies and anticipation in microscopic traffic models, Phys. A, 360 (2006), pp. 71-88.