A sensitivity analysis of the SimSphere SVAT model in the context of EO-based operational products development

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 49, Issue , 2013, Pages 166-179

  Petropoulos, George P ^a   Griffiths, Hywel M ^a   Tarantola, Stefano ^b  

^a ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

BACCO GEM SA; Earth observation; Energy fluxes; Gaussian process emulators; Sensitivity analysis; SimSphere; Soil moisture; Triangle

Indexed keywords

BACCO GEM-SA; EARTH OBSERVATIONS; ENERGY FLUXES; GAUSSIAN PROCESS EMULATORS; SIMSPHERE; TRIANGLE;

DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS; OBSERVATORIES; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATED ANNEALING; SOIL MOISTURE; SURFACE MEASUREMENT;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; EOS; LAND SURFACE; META-ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PROBABILITY; REMOTE SENSING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATION;

EID: 84884934250     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Annoni P., Brüggemann R., Saltelli A. Partial order investigation of multiple indicator systems using variance-based sensitivity analysis. Environmental Modelling and Software 2011, 26(7):950-958.
2. Asserin O., Loredo A., Petelet M., Iooss B. Global sensitivity analysis in welding simulations-what are the material data you really need?. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 2011, 47(9):1004-1016.
3. Battrick B. The Changing Earth. New Scientific Challenges for ESA's Living Planet Programme 2006, ESA SP-1304, ESA Publications Division, ESTEC, The Netherlands.
4. Bilotta G., Cappello A., Hérault A., Vicari A., Russo G., Del Negro C. Sensitivity analysis of the MAGFLOW Cellular Automaton model for lava flow simulation. Environmental Modelling and Software 2012, 35:122-131.
5. Borgonovo E., Castaings W., Tarantola S. Model emulation and moment-independent sensitivity analysis: an application to environmental modelling. Environmental Modelling and Software 2011, 34:105-115.
6. Brutsaert W., Sugita M. Application of self-preservation in the diurnal evolution of the surface energy budget to determine daily evaporation. Journal of Geophysical Research 1992, 97(D17):18377-18382.
7. Cariboni J., Gatelli D., Liska R., Saltelli A. The role of sensitivity analysis in ecological modelling. Ecological Modelling 2007, 203:167-182.
8. Carlson T.N. An overview of the "triangle method" for estimating surface evapotranspiration and soil moisture from satellite imagery. Sensors 2007, 7:1612-1629.
9. Carlson T.N., Boland F.E. Analysis of urban-rural canopy using a surface heat flux/temperature model. Journal of Applied Meteorology 1978, 17:998-1014.
10. Castaings W., Borgonovo E., Morris M.D., Tarantola S. Sampling strategies in density-based sensitivity analysis. Environmental Modelling and Software 2012, 38:13-26.
11. Chauhan N.S., Miller S., Ardanuy P. Spaceborne soil moisture estimation at high resolution: amicrowave-optical/IR synergistic approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2003, 22:4599-4646.
12. Chen Y., Yu J., Khan S. Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criterai weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Environmental Modelling and Software 2010, 25:1582-1591.
13. Chen L., Tian Y., Cao C., Zhang S., Zhang S. Sensitivity and uncertaintly analyses of an extended ASM3-SMP model describing membrane bioreactor operation. Journal of Membrane Science 2012, 389:99-109.
14. Chu-Agor M.L., Muñoz-Carpena R., Kiker G., Emanuelsson A., Linkov I. Exploring vulnerability of coastal habitats to sea level rise through global sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. Environmental Modelling and Software 2011, 26(5):593-604.
15. Cosby B.J., Hornberger G.H., Clap R.B., Ginn T.R. A statistical explanation of the relationship of soil moisture characteristics to the physical properties of soils. Water Resources Res. 1984, 20:682-690.
16. Crago R.D. Daytime evaporation from conservation of surface flux ratios. Scaling up in Hydrology Using Remote Sensing 1996, 235-244. Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford. J.B. Stewart (Ed.).
17. Dirmeyer P.A. The terrestrial segment of soil moisture-climate coupling. Geophysical Research Letters 2011, 38(16):L16702.
18. Durre I., Wallace J.M., Lettenmaier D.P. Dependence of extreme daily maximum temperatures on antecedent soil moisture in the contiguous United States during summer. Journal of Climate 2000, 13:2641-2651.
19. Ellis C.R., Pomeroy J.W. Estimating sub-canopy shortwave irradiance to melting snow on forested slopes. Hydrological Processes 2007, 21(19):2581-2593.
20. Ellis C.R., Pomeroy J.W., Essery R.L.H., Link T.E. Effects of needleleaf forest cover on radiation and snowmelt dynamics in the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2011, 41:608-620.
21. European Space Agency, Support to Science Element APathfinder for Innovation in Earth Observation 2012, 41. ESA, Available from:, (accessed 10.07.13.). http://due.esrin.esa.int/stse/files/document/STSE_report_121016.pdf.
22. Feyissa A.H., Gernaey K.V., Adler-Nissen J. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis: mathematical model of coupled heat and mass transfer for a contact baking process. Journal of Food Engineering 2012, 109:281-290.
23. Gatelli D., Kucherenko S., Ratto M., Tarantola S. Calculating first-order sensitivity measures: a benchmark of some recent methodologies. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2009, 94:1212-1219.
24. Gillies R.R. APhysically-based Land Sue Classification Scheme Using Remote Solar and Thermal Infrared Measurements Suitable for Describing Urbanisation 1993, 121. (PhD thesis), University of Newcastle, UK.
25. Gillies R.R., Carlson T.N., Cui J., Kustas W.P., Humes K.S. Verification of the "triangle" method for obtaining surface soil water content and energy fluxes from remote measurements of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index NDVI and surface radiant temperature. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1997, 18:3145-3166.
26. Hirschi M., Seneviratne S.I., Alexandrov V., Boberg F., Boroneant C., Christensen O.B., Formayer H., Orlowsky B., Stepanek P. Observational evidence for soil-moisture impact on hot extremes in southeastern Europe. Nature Geoscience 2011, 4:17-21.
27. Johnson J.S., Gosling J.P., Kennedy M.C. Gaussian process emulation for second-order Monte Carlo simulations. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2011, 141:1838-1848.
28. Kennedy M.C., Anderson C.W., Conti S., O'Hagan A. Case studies in Gaussian process modelling of computer codes. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 2006, 91:1301-1309.
29. Kennedy M.C., O'Hagan A. Bayesian calibration of computer models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 2001, 63(3):425-464.
30. Kucherenko S., Tarantola S., Annoni P. Estimation of global sensitivity indices for models with dependent variables. Computer Physics Communications 2012, 183:937-946.
31. Lockart N., Kavetski D., Franks S.W. On the role of soil moisture in daytime evolution of temperatures. Hydrological Processes 2012, 10.1002/hyp.9525.
32. Makler-Pick V., Gal G., Gorfine M., Hipsey M.R., Carmel Y. Sensitivity analysis for complex ecological models - a new approach. Environmental Modelling and Software 2011, 26(2):124-134.
33. Moradkhani H. Hydrologic remote sensing and land surface data assimilation. Sensors 2008, 8(5):2986-3004.
34. Moran M.S., Peters-Lidard C.D., Watts J.M., McElroy S. Estimating soil moisture at the watershed scale with satellite-based radar and land surface models. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 2004, 30(5):805-824.
35. Nossent J., Elsen P., Bauwens W. Sobol's sensitivity analysis of a complex environmental model. Environmental Modelling and Software 2011, 26:1515-1525.
36. O'Hagan A. Bayesian analysis of computer code outputs: a tutorial. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 2006, 91:1290-1300.
37. Oakley J., O'Hagan A. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Bayesian approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 2004, 66:751-769.
38. Olioso A., Chauki H., Courault D., Wigneron J.-P. Estimation of evapotranspiration and photosynthesis by assimilation of remote sensing data into SVAT models. Remote Sensing of Environment 1999, 68:341-356.
39. Oliphant A.J., Spronken-Smith R.A., Sturman A.P., Owens I.F. Spatial variability of surface radiation fluxes in Mountainous Terrain. Journal of Applied Meteorology 2003, 42(1):113-128.
40. Parry H.R., Topping C.J., Kennedy M.C., Boatman N.D., Murray A.W.A. ABayesian sensitivity analysis applied to an Agent-based model of bird population response to landscape change. Environmental Modelling and Software 2012, 45:104-115.
41. Petropoulos G., Carlson T.N., Wooster M.J., Islam S. Areview of Ts/VI remote sensing based methods for the retrieval of land surface energy fluxes and soil surface moisture. Progress in Physical Geography 2009, 33(2):224-250.
42. Petropoulos G., Carlson T.N., Wooster M.J. An overview of the use of the SimSphere soil vegetation atmosphere transfer (SVAT) model for the study of land-atmosphere interactions. Sensors 2009, 9(6):4286-4308.
43. Petropoulos G., Wooster M.J., Kennedy M., Carlson T.N., Scholze Aglobal sensitivity analysis study of the 1d SimSphere SVAT model using the GEM SAGEM-SA software. Ecological Modelling 2009, 220(19):2427-2440.
44. Petropoulos G., Ratto M., Tarantola S. Acomparative analysis of emulators for the sensitivity analysis of a land surface process model. 6th International Conference on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output, July 19-22nd, 2010, Milan, Italy, on Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2010, vol. 2 (6):7716-7717.
45. Petropoulos G., Carlson T.N. Retrievals of turbulent heat fluxes and soil moisture content by Remote Sensing. Advances in Environmental Remote Sensing: Sensors, Algorithms, and Applications 2011, Taylor and Francis, pp. 53-88. Q. Weng (Ed.).
46. Petropoulos G.P. Remote sensing of surface turbulent energy fluxes. Remote Sensing of Energy Fluxes and Soil Moisture Content 2013, Taylor and Francis, (in press). G.P. Petropoulos (Ed.).
47. Petropoulos G.P., Konstas I., Carlson T.N. Automation of SimSphere Land Surface Model Use as a Standalone Application and Integration with EO Data for Deriving Key Land Surface Parameters 2013, European Geosciences Union, April 7-12th, 2013, Vienna, Austria.
48. Rao D.M., Konda J. Computation of sensitivity indices with different routines for Latin Hypercube Designs. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences 2010, 2:7730-7731.
49. Ratto M., Castelletti A., Pagano A. Emulation techniques for the reduction and sensitivity analysis of complex environmental models. Environmental Modelling and Software 2011, 34:1-4.
50. Ratto M., Tarantola S., Saltelli A. Sensitivity analysis in model calibration: GSA-GLUE approach. Computer Physics Communications 2001, 136:212-224.
51. Sabetraftar K., Mackey B., Croke B. Sensitivity of modelled gross primary productivity to topographic effects on surface radiation: a case study in the Cotter River Catchment, Australia. Ecological Modelling 2011, 222(3):795-803.
52. Sade R., Rimmer A., Iggy Litaor M., Shamir E., Furman A. The sensitivity of snow-surface temperature equation to sloped terrain. Journal of Hydrology 2011, 408(3):308-313.
53. Saltelli A., Chan K., Scott E.M. Sensitivity Analysis, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics 2000, 467. Wiley, Chichester.
54. Saltelli A., Tarantola S., Campolongo F., Ratto M. Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: a Guide to Assessing Scientific Models 2004, 217. Wiley and Sons, Ltd., UK.
55. Saltelli A., Tarantola S., Chan K.P.-S. Aquantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output. Technometrics 1999, 41(1):39-56.
56. Santanello J.A., Peters-Lidard C.D., Kumar S.V., Alonge C., Tao W.-K. Amodeling and observational framework for diagnosing local land-atmosphere coupling on diurnal time scales. Journal of Hydrometeorology 2009, 10:577-599.
57. Schwieger V. Variance-based sensitivity analysis for model evaluation in Engineering Surveys. INGEO 2004 and FIG Regional Central and Eastern European Conference on Engineering Surveying, Bratislava, Slovakia, November 11-13, 2004 2004, Available on line at:, (accessed 24.04.07.). http://www.fig.net/pub/bratislava/papers/ts%2001/ts%2001%20schwieger.pdf.
58. Seneviratne S.I., Corti T., Davin E.L., Hirschi M., Jaeger E.B., Lehner I., Orlowsky B., Teuling A.J. Investigating soil moisture-climate interactions in a changing climate: a review. Earth-Science Reviews 2010, 99:125-161.
59. Sobol' I.M. Uniformly distributed sequences with additional uniformity properties. Zhurnal Vychislitelnoi Matematiki i Matematicheskoi Fiziki 1976, 16(5):1332-1337.
60. Sobrino J.A., Franch B., Mattar C., Jiménez-Muñoz J.C., Corbari C. Amethod to estimate soil moisture from airborne hyperspectral scanner (AHS) and aster data: application to SEN2FLEX and SEN3EXP campaigns. Remote Sensing of Environment 2012, 17:415-428.
61. Song X., Bryan B.A., Paul K.I., Zhao G. Variance-based sensitivity analysis of a forest growth model. Ecological Modelling 2012, 246:135-143.
62. Stein M. Large sample properties of simulations using Latin hypercube sampling. Technometrics 1987, 29(2):143-151. correction in 32:367.
63. Sugita M., Brutsaert M. Daily evaporation over a region from lower boundary layer profiles. Water Resources Research 1991, 27:747-752.
64. Sun X.Y., Newham L.T.H., Croke B.F.W., Norton J.P. Three complementary methods for sensitivity analysis of a water quality model. Environmental Modelling and Software 2012, 37:19-29.
65. Villegas J.C., Breshears D.D., Zou C.B., Law D.J. Ecohydrological controls of soil evaporation in deciduous drylands: how the hierarchical effects of litter, patch and vegetation mosaic cover interact with phenology and season. Journal of Arid Environments 2010, 74(5):595-602.