Activated carbon honeycomb monolith - Zeolite 13X hybrid system to capture CO2 from flue gases employing Electric Swing Adsorption

Chemical Engineering Science

Volumn 104, Issue , 2013, Pages 304-318

  Ribeiro, R P P L ^a   Grande, C A ^b   Rodrigues, A E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

^b SINTEF MATERIALS AND CHEMISTRY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Activated carbon; Electric Swing Adsorption; ESA; Monolith; Zeolite 13X

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED CARBON; ADSORPTION; ENERGY UTILIZATION; FLUE GASES; HYBRID SYSTEMS; MONOLITHIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS;

ACTIVATED CARBON MONOLITHS; BREAKTHROUGH EXPERIMENT; ELECTRIC SWING ADSORPTION (ESA); ESA; EXPERIMENTAL CYCLES; MONOLITH; SWING ADSORPTION; ZEOLITE 13X;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

EID: 84884934067     PISSN: 00092509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2013.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. 2 capture from power plants - part II. A parametric study of the economical performance based on mono-ethanolamine. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 1:135-142.
2. 2 capture from power plants. Part I. A parametric study of the technical-performance based on monoethanolamine. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 1:37-46.
3. Ahn H., Brandani S. Analysis of breakthrough dynamics in rectangular channels of arbitrary aspect ratio. AIChE Journal 2005, 51:1980-1990.
4. Ahn H., Brandani S. Dynamics of carbon dioxide breakthrough in a carbon monolith over a wide concentration range. Adsorption - Journal of the International Adsorption Society 2005, 11:473-477.
5. 2 capture using MEA scrubbing: a flowsheet decomposition method. Energy Conversion and Management 2005, 46:475-487.
6. 2 from activated carbon fibre-phenolic resin composite by electrothermal effect. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:57-63.
7. 2 capture by electrothermal swing adsorption with activated carbon fibre materials. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5:16-25.
8. 2 adsorption performance of activated carbon fiber-phenolic resin composite: a simulation study. Fuel 2013, 103:80-86.
9. Aris R. On the dispersion of a solute in a fluid flowing through a tube. Proceedings of the Royal Society London 1956, A235:67-77.
10. Bauen A. Future energy sources and systems - acting on climate change and energy security. Journal of Power Sources 2006, 157:893-901.
11. 2 absorption from flue gases. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2005, 44:945-969.
12. Burchell T.D., Judkins R.R., Rogers M.R., Williams A.M. A novel process and material for the separation of carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide gas mixtures. Carbon 1997, 35:1279-1294.
13. 2 from Fossil-Fueled Power Plant Emissions 2002, Ut-Battelle, LLC, US.
14. 2 por Processos Adsorptivos 2005, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
15. Cavenati S., Grande C.A., Rodrigues A.E. Adsorption equilibrium of methane, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen on zeolite 13X at high pressures. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data 2004, 49:1095-1101.
16. 2 capture by adsorption: materials and process development. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 1:11-18.
17. 2 capture by adsorption: materials and process development. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 1:11-18.
18. 2 from flue gas and its power consumption. Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis 2004, 405-410. Elsevier. J.-S.C. Sang-Eon Park, L. Kyu-Wan (Eds.).
19. Choi S., Drese J.H., Jones C.W. Adsorbent materials for carbon dioxide capture from large anthropogenic point sources. Chemsuschem 2009, 2:796-854.
20. Chou C.T., Chen C.Y. Carbon dioxide recovery by vacuum swing adsorption. Separation and Purification Technology 2004, 39:51-65.
21. 2 capture by indirect thermal swing adsorption. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5:1206-1213.
22. Crittenden B.D., Camus O., Perera S.P., Mays T.J., Sánchez-Liarte F., Tennison S.R., Crezee E. Nonuniform channels in adsorbent monoliths. AIChE Journal 2011, 57:1163-1172.
23. D'Alessandro D.M., Smit B., Long J.R. Carbon dioxide capture: prospects for new materials. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2010, 49:6058-6082.
24. Da Silva F., Silva J., Rodrigues A. A general package for the simulation of cyclic adsorption processes. Adsorption - Journal of the International Adsorption Society 1999, 5:229-244.
25. Ebner A.D., Ritter J.A. State-of-the-art adsorption and membrane separation processes for carbon dioxide production from carbon dioxide emitting industries. Separation Science and Technology 2009, 44:1273-1421.
26. Ettlili, N., Bertelle, S., Roizard, D., Vallieres, C., Grevillot, G., 2006. A new electrical swing adsorption process for postcombustion CO2 capture. In: Elsevier (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies.
27. Fabuss B.M., Dubois W.C. Apparatus and Process for Desorption of Filter Beds by Electric Current 1971, Lowell Technological Institute Research Foundation, United States.
28. x in the flue gas degradation of MEA. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:1566-1573.
29. Gomes V.G., Yee K.W.K. Pressure swing adsorption for carbon dioxide sequestration from exhaust gases. Separation and Purification Technology 2002, 28:161-171.
30. Grande C.A., Cavenati S., Barcia P., Hammer J., Fritz H.G., Rodrigues A.E. Adsorption of propane and propylene in zeolite 4A honeycomb monolith. Chemical Engineering Science 2006, 61:3053-3067.
31. 2 capture technique. Energy Procedia 2009, 1:1219-1225.
32. 2 capture from NGCC power stations using Electric Swing Adsorption (ESA). Energy & Fuels 2009, 23:2797-2803.
33. 2 removal from flue gases. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2:194-202.
34. 2 working capacities with NaY. Separation Science and Technology 2005, 40:2569-2591.
35. 2 capture from flue gas - aspects from materials and theoretical chemistry. Nanoscale 2010, 2:1819-1841.
36. IEA, 2010. Energy Technology Perspectives 2010 - Scenarios and Strategies to 2050, Paris.
37. IEA, 2011. CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion - Highlights, Paris.
38. Ishibashi M., Ota H., Akutsu N., Umeda S., Tajika M., Izumi J., Yasutake A., Kabata T., Kageyama Y. Technology for removing carbon dioxide from power plant flue gas by the physical adsorption method. Energy Conversion and Management 1996, 37:929-933.
39. 2 capture, storage, and utilisation in Chinese Academy of Sciences. Fuel 2013, 108:112-130.
40. Li Y.Y., Perera S.P., Crittenden B.D. Zeolite monoliths for air separation part 2: oxygen enrichment, pressure drop and pressurisation. Chemical Engineering Research & Design 1998, 76:931-941.
41. 2 capture from flue gas by an adsorption process in a coal-fired power plant. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2012, 51:7355-7363.
42. Mérel J., Clausse M., Meunier F. Carbon dioxide capture by indirect thermal swing adsorption using 13X zeolite. Environmental Progress 2006, 25:327-333.
43. 2 post-combustion capture by indirect thermal swing adsorption using 13X and 5A zeolites. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2008, 47:209-215.
44. Metz, B., Davidson, O., de Coninck, H.C., Loos, M.A.M.L., 2005. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. IPCC.
45. Moghtaderi, B., 2007. Techno-economic assessment of advanced technologies for power generation from biomass and coal. In: Proceedings of the Australian Combustion Symposium, University of Sydney.
46. 2 Emissions: 2012 Report. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency 2012, The Hague. P.N.E.A. Agency (Ed.).
47. 2 from flue gas. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2002, 41:4122-4131.
48. Peters M., Kohler B., Kuckshinrichs W., Leitner W., Markewitz P., Muller T.E. Chemical technologies for exploiting and recycling carbon dioxide into the value chain. Chemsuschem 2011, 4:1216-1240.
49. Petkovska M., Tondeur D., Grevillot G., Granger J., Mitrovic M. Temperature-swing gas separation with electrothermal desorption step. Separation Science and Technology 1991, 26:425-444.
50. 2 capture processes by temperature swing adsorption using solid sorbents. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2013, 14:74-83.
51. 2 capture by adsorption with nitrogen enriched carbons. Fuel 2007, 86:2204-2212.
52. Reynolds S.P., Ebner A.D., Ritter J.A. New pressure swing adsorption cycles for carbon dioxide sequestration. Adsorption - Journal of the International Adsorption Society 2005, 11:531-536.
53. 2 in activated carbon honeycomb monolith. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data 2008, 53:2311-2317.
54. Ribeiro R.P.P.L., Grande C.A., Rodrigues A.E. Electrothermal performance of an activated carbon honeycomb monolith. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 2012, 90:2013-2022.
55. 2 capture. Science 2009, 325:1652-1654.
56. 2 capture costs. Applied Thermal Engineering 2008, 28:1039-1046.
57. Roychoudhury, S., Walsh, D., Perry, J., 2005. Resistively-heated microlith-based adsorber for carbon dioxide and trace contaminant removal. In: Proceedings of the International Conference On Environmental Systems. SAE International, Rome, Italy.
58. 2 Capture - Health and Environmental Impacts. Bellona Report 2009, The Bellona Foundation, Oslo. T.B. Foundation (Ed.).
59. Sullivan P.D., Rood M.J., Grévillot G., Wander J.D., Hay K.J. Activated carbon fiber cloth electrothermal swing adsorption system. Environmental Science & Technology 2004, 38:4865-4877.
60. Sullivan P.D., Rood M.J., Hay K.J., Qi S. Adsorption and electrothermal desorption of hazardous organic vapors. Journal of Environmental Engineering - ASCE 2001, 127:217-223.
61. Taylor G. Conditions under which dispersion of a solute in a stream of solvent can be used to measure molecular diffusion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A - Mathematical and Physical Sciences 1954, 225:473-477.
62. Taylor G. The dispersion of matter in turbulent flow through a pipe. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A - Mathematical and Physical Sciences 1954, 223:446-468.
63. 2 capture and recovery: experiments and modeling. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2012, 51:15729-15737.
64. Tlili N., Grevillot G., Vallieres C. Carbon dioxide capture and recovery by means of TSA and/or VSA. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2009, 3:519-527.
65. Valdes-Solis T., Linders M.J.G., Kapteijn F., Marban G., Fuertes A.B. Adsorption and breakthrough performance of carbon-coated ceramic monoliths at low concentration of N-Butane. Chemical Engineering Science 2004, 59:2791-2800.
66. Wang L., Liu Z., Li P., Yu J., Rodrigues A.E. Experimental and modeling investigation on post-combustion carbon dioxide capture using zeolite 13X-APG by hybrid VTSA process. Chemical Engineering Journal 2012, 197:151-161.
67. Wong, S., Biolleti, R., 2002. Carbon Dioxide Separation Technologies Alberta Research Council Inc., Alberta.
68. Yazaydin A.O.z.r., Snurr R.Q., Park T.-H., Koh K., Liu J., LeVan M.D., Benin A.I., Jakubczak P., Lanuza M., Galloway D.B., Low J.J., Willis R.R. Screening of metal-organic frameworks for carbon dioxide capture from flue gas using a combined experimental and modeling approach. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2009, 131:18198-18199.
69. 2 absorption and desorption in a packed column. Energy & Fuels 2001, 15:274-278.
70. Young L.C., Finlayson B.A. Mathematical modeling of monolith converter. Advances in Chemistry Series 1974, 629-643.
71. Yu F.D., Luo L.A., Grevillot G. Electrothermal desorption using joule effect on an activated carbon monolith. Journal of Environmental Engineering - ASCE 2004, 130:242-248.
72. Zabka M., Minceva M., Rodrigues A.E. Experimental and modeling study of adsorption in preparative monolithic silica column. Chemical Engineering and Processing 2006, 45:150-160.
73. 2 capture from flue gas by vacuum swing adsorption. Environmental Science & Technology 2008, 42:563-569.
74. 2 capture from flue gas. Energy Conversion and Management 2008, 49:346-356.