Risk-need-responsivity (RNR): Leading towards another generation of the model

Simulation Strategies to Reduce Recidivism: Risk Need Responsivity (RNR) Modeling for the Criminal Justice System

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 285-307

  Taxman, Faye S ^a   Caudy, Michael S ^a   Pattavina, April ^b  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884926073     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6188-3     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Andrews, D. A. (2006). Enhancing adherence to Risk-Need-Responsivity: Making quality a matter of policy. Criminology and Public Policy, 5(3), 595-602.
2. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). Thepsychology ofcriminal conduct (5th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
3. Andrews, D. A., & Dowden, C. (2005). Managing correctional treatment for reduced recidivism: A meta-analytic review of programme integrity. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 173-187.
4. Andrews, D. A., & Dowden, C. (2006). Risk principle of case classification in correctional treatment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50(1), 88-100.
5. Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28(3), 369-404.
6. Austin, J. (2006). How much risk can we take-The misuse of risk assessment in corrections. Federal Probation, 70, 58-63.
7. Austin, J. (2009). The limits of prison based treatment. Victims and Offenders, 4, 311-320.
8. Austin, J., Coleman, D., Peyton, J., & Johnson, K. D. (2003). Reliability and validity study of the LSI-R risk assessment instrument. Washington, DC: Institute on Crime, Justice, and Corrections at The George Washington University.
9. Baird, C. (2009). A question ofevidence: A critique ofrisk assessment models used in thejustice system. Madison, WI: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
10. Ball, J. C., Shaffer, J. W., & Nurco, D. N. (1983). The day-to-day criminality of heroin addicts in Baltimore: A study in the continuity of offense rates. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 12, 119-142.
11. Bennett, T., Holloway, K., & Farrington, D. (2008). The statistical association between drug misuse and crime: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(2), 107-118.
12. Bourgon, G., & Armstrong, B. (2005). Transferring the principles of effective treatment into a “real world” prison setting. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(1), 3-25.
13. Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (1999a). What works for female offenders: A meta-analytic review. Crime and Delinquency, 45, 438-451.
14. Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (1999b). What works in young offender treatment: A meta-analysis. Forum on Corrections Research, 45, 438-452.
15. Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (2000). Effective correctional treatment and violent reoffending: A meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42, 449-467.
16. Flores, A. W., Travis, L. F., & Latessa, E. J. (2004). Case classification for juvenile corrections: An assessment of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI), executive summary (98-JB-VX-0108). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice.
17. Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (1999). The forgotten issue in effective correctional treatment: Program implementation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43(3), 180-187.
18. Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works! Criminology, 34(4), 575-607.
19. Gottfredson, S. D., & Moriarty, L. J. (2006). Statistical risk assessment: Old problems and new applications. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 178-200.
20. Gottfredson, M. R., & Gottfredson, D. M. (1987). Decision making in criminal justice (Vol. 3). New York, NY: Springer.
21. Huebner, B. M., & Berg, M. T. (2011). Examining the sources of variation in risk for recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 28(1), 146-173.
22. Landenberger, N. A., & Lipsey, M. W. (2005). The positive effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 451-476.
23. Langan, P. A., & Levin, D. J. (2002). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
24. Lipsey, M. W., & Cullen, F. T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297-320.
25. Lipsey, M. W., Landenberger, N. A. & Wilson, S. J. (2007). Effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for criminal offenders. Campbell Systematic Reviews. Retrieved from http://campbell-collaboration.org/lib/project/29/.
26. Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Smith, P. (2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention. Criminology and Public Policy, 5(3), 575-594.
27. Lurigio, A., Cho, Y., Swartz, J., Graf, I., & Pickup, L. (2003). Standardized assessment of substance-related, other psychiatric, and comorbid disorders among probationers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 630-652.
28. Makarios, M., Steiner, B., & Travis, L. F. (2010). Examining the predictors of recidivism among men and women released from prison in Ohio. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(12), 1377-1391.
29. Mitchell, O., Wilson, D. B., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2007). Does incarceration-based drug treatment reduce recidivism? A meta-analytic synthesis of the research. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3(4), 353-375.
30. Mumola, C. J., & Bonczar, T. P. (1998). Substance abuse and treatment of adults on probation, 1995. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
31. Nurco, D. N., Hanlon, T. E., & Kinlock, T. W. (1991). Recent research on the relationship between illicit drug use and crime. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 9(3), 221-242.
32. Nurco, D. N., Hanlon, T. E., Kinlock, T. W., & Slaght, E. (1984) Variations in criminal patterns among narcotic addicts in Baltimore and New York City, 1983-1984. Friends Medical Science Research Center.
33. Peters, R. H., & Bekman, N. M. (2007). Treatment and reentry approaches for offenders with co-occurring disorders. In R. B. Greifinger, J. Bick, & J. Goldenson (Eds.), Public health behind bars: From prisons to communities (pp. 368-384). New York: Springer.
34. Pew Center on the States. (2011). State of recidivism: The revolving door of America’s prisons. Washington, DC: The Pew Charitable Trusts.
35. Polaschek, D. L. (2011). Many sizes fit all: A preliminary framework for conceptualizing the development and provision of cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation programs for offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 20-35.
36. Staton-Tindall, M., Havens, J. R., Oser, C. B., & Burnett, M. C. (2011). Substance use prevalence in criminal justice settings. In C. Leukefeld, T. P. Gullota, & J. Gregrich (Eds.), Handbook of evidence-based substance abuse treatment in criminal justice settings (pp. 81-101). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
37. Steadman, H. J., Osher, F. C., Robbins, P. C., Case, B., & Samuels, S. (2009). Prevalence of serious mental illness among jail inmates. Psychiatric Services, 60(6), 761-765.
38. Taxman, F. S. (2006). Assessment with a flair: Offender accountability in supervision plans. Federal Probation, 70(2), 2-7.
39. Taxman, F. S., Perdoni, M. L., & Harrison, L. D. (2007). Drug treatment services for adult offenders: The state of the state. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32(3), 239-254.
40. Tucker, J. A., & Roth, D. L. (2006). Extending the evidence hierarchy to enhance evidence-based practice for substance use disorders. Addiction, 101, 918-932.
41. Wexler, D. (1993). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the criminal courts. William & Mary Law Review, 35(1), 279-299.
42. Wexler, D. (2000). Therapeutic jurisprudence: An overview. Thomas M. Cooley Law Review, 17, 125-135.