THETIS: Three dimensional tennis shots a human action dataset

IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 676-681

  Gourgari, Sofia ^a   Goudelis, Georgios ^a   Karpouzis, Konstantinos ^a   Kollias, Stefanos ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

3D representation; dataset; Human action recognition; Kinect

Indexed keywords

3D REPRESENTATIONS; AUTOMATIC ANALYSIS; CLASSIFICATION METHODS; DATASET; HUMAN-ACTION RECOGNITION; KINECT; MOTION CAPTURE DATA; STATE-OF-THE-ART ALGORITHMS;

ALGORITHMS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATABASE SYSTEMS; GESTURE RECOGNITION; MOTION ESTIMATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SPORTS; VIDEO CAMERAS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 84884919332     PISSN: 21607508     EISSN: 21607516     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPRW.2013.102     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Center for Research in Computer Vision. UCF-ARG Data Set. http://crcv.ucf.edu/data/UCF-ARG.php, 2013. [Online; accessed 17-April-2013].
2. OpenNI. The standard framework for 3D sensing. http://www.openni.org, 2013. [Online; accessed 17-April-2013].
3. J. Aggarwal and M. Ryoo. Human activity analysis: A review. ACM Comput. Surv., 43(3):16:1-16:43, Apr. 2011.
4. M. Blank, L. Gorelick, E. Shechtman, M. Irani, and R. Basri. Actions as space-time shapes. In The Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05), pages 1395-1402, 2005.
5. V. Bloom, D. Makris, and V. Argyriou. G3d: A gaming action dataset and real time action recognition evaluation framework. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2012 IEEE Computer Society Conference on, pages 7-12, 2012.
6. C.-C. Chen, M. S. Ryoo, and J. K. Aggarwal. UT-Tower Dataset: Aerial View Activity Classification Challenge. http://cvrc.ece.utexas.edu/SDHA2010/Aerial View Activity.html, 2010.
7. G. Denina, B. Bhanu, H. Nguyen, C. Ding, A. Kamal, C. Ravishankar, A. Roy-Chowdhury, A. Ivers, and B. Varda. Videoweb dataset for multi-camera activities and non-verbal communication. In Distributed Video Sensor Networks, pages 335-347. Springer London, 2011.
8. O. Kliper-Gross, T. Hassner, and L. Wolf. The action similarity labeling challenge. IEEE Transactions of Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI, 2012.
9. I. Laptev and T. Lindeberg. Space-time interest points. In IN ICCV, pages 432-439, 2003.
10. I. Laptev, M. Marsza?ek, C. Schmid, and B. Rozenfeld. Learning realistic human actions from movies. In Conference on Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE, 2008.
11. J. Liu, J. Luo, and M. Shah. Recognizing realistic actions from videos in the wild, 2009.
12. M. Marsza?ek, I. Laptev, and C. Schmid. Actions in context. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition, 2009.
13. A. Patron, M. Marszalek, A. Zisserman, and I. Reid. High five: Recognising human interactions in tv shows. In Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, pages 50.1-50.11. BMVA Press, 2010.
14. A. Patron-Perez, M. Marszalek, I. Reid, and A. Zisserman. Structured learning of human interactions in tv shows. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 34(12):2441-2453, 2012.
15. PrimeSense. What is all about. http://www.primesense.com/, 2013. [Online; accessed 17-April-2013].
16. H. Ragheb, S. A. Velastin, P. Remagnino, and T. Ellis. Vihasi: virtual human action silhouette data for the performance evaluation of silhouette-based action recognition methods. In VNBA, pages 77-84, 2008.
17. S. Ramagiri, R. Kavi, and V. Kulathumani. Real-time multiview human action recognition using a wireless camera network. In Distributed Smart Cameras (ICDSC), 2011 Fifth ACM/IEEE International Conference on, pages 1-6, 2011.
18. M. D. Rodriguez, J. Ahmed, and M. Shah. Action mach: a spatio-temporal maximum average correlation height filter for action recognition. In In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2008.
19. M. S. Ryoo and J. K. Aggarwal. UTInteraction Dataset, ICPR contest on Semantic Description of Human Activities (SDHA). http://cvrc.ece.utexas.edu/ SDHA2010/Human Interaction.html, 2010.
20. C. Schuldt, I. Laptev, and B. Caputo. Recognizing human actions: A local svm approach. In In Proc. ICPR, pages 32-36, 2004.
21. S. Singh, S. A. Velastin, and H. Ragheb. Muhavi: A multicamera human action video dataset for the evaluation of action recognition methods. In AVSS, pages 48-55, 2010.
22. J. Sivic and A. Zisserman. Video Google: A text retrieval approach to object matching in videos. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, volume 2, pages 1470-1477, Oct. 2003.
23. K. Soomro, A. R. Zamir, and M. Shah. Ucf101: A dataset of 101 human actions classes from videos in the wild. CoRR, abs/1212.0402, 2012.
24. M. Tenorth, J. Bandouch, and M. Beetz. The tum kitchen data set of everyday manipulation activities for motion tracking and action recognition. In Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops), 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on, pages 1089-1096, 2009.
25. H.Wang, A. Klaser, C. Schmid, and C.-L. Liu. Action recognition by dense trajectories. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR '11, pages 3169-3176, 2011.
26. D. Weinland and E. Boyer. Action recognition using exemplar-based embedding. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Anchorage, pages 1-7, 2008.
27. C. Wolf, J. Mille, E. Lombardi, O. Celiktutan, M. Jiu, M. Baccouche, E. Dellandre'a, C.-E. Bichot, C. Garcia, and B. Sankur. The LIRIS Human activities dataset and the ICPR 2012 human activities recognition and localization competition. Technical Report RR-LIRIS-2012-004, LIRIS UMR 5205 CNRS/INSA de Lyon/Universite' Claude Bernard Lyon 1/Universite' Lumie're Lyon 2/E'cole Centrale de Lyon, Mar. 2012.