Model refactoring using interactive genetic algorithm

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8084 LNCS, Issue , 2013, Pages 96-110

  Ghannem, Adnane ^a   El Boussaidi, Ghizlane ^a   Kessentini, Marouane ^b  

^a ÉCOLE DE TECHNOLOGIE SUPÉRIEURE   (Canada)

^b MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Interactive Genetic Algorithm; Model refactoring; Refactoring by example; Software maintenance

Indexed keywords

CLASSIC GA; DESIGN MODELING; FITNESS FUNCTIONS; INTERACTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM; OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS; QUALITY OF DESIGN; REFACTORINGS; STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; SEMANTICS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

GENETIC ALGORITHMS;

EID: 84884916788     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39742-4_9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Lientz, B.P., Swanson, E.B., Tompkins, G.E.: Characteristics of application software maintenance. Commun. ACM 21(6), 466-471 (1978)
2. Fowler, M.: Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wesley (1999)
3. Mens, T., Tourwé, T.: A Survey of Software Refactoring. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 30(2), 126-139 (2004)
4. Opdyke, W.F.: Refactoring: A Program Restructuring Aid in Designing Object-Oriented Application Frameworks, U. Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1992)
5. Moha, N.: DECOR: Détection et correction des défauts dans les systèmes orientés objet, p. 157. UdeM & USTdeLille, Montréal (2008)
6. Harman, M., Tratt, L.: Pareto optimal search based refactoring at the design level. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual GECCO 2007, pp. 1106-1113. ACM, London (2007)
7. O'Keeffe, M.: Search-based refactoring: an empirical study. J. Softw. Maint. Evol. 20(5), 345-364 (2008)
8. O'Keeffe, M., Cinneide, M.O.: Search-based software maintenance. In: CSMR (2006)
9. Kessentini, M., Sahraoui, H.A., Boukadoum, M.: Model Transformation as an Optimization Problem. In: Czarnecki, K., Ober, I., Bruel, J.-M., Uhl, A., Völter, M. (eds.) MODELS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5301, pp. 159-173. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
10. El-Boussaidi, G., Mili, H.: Detecting Patterns of Poor Design Solutions Using Constraint Propagation. In: Czarnecki, K., Ober, I., Bruel, J.-M., Uhl, A., Völter, M. (eds.) MODELS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5301, pp. 189-203. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
11. Takagi, H.: Interactive evolutionary computation: fusion of the capabilities of EC optimization and human evaluation. Proceedings of the IEEE 89(9), 1275-1296 (2001)
12. Fenton, N.E., Pfleeger, A.S.L.: Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach, 2nd edn., p. 656. PWS Pub., Boston (1998)
13. Genero, M., Piattini, M., Calero, C.: Empirical validation of class diagram metrics. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on ESE (2002)
14. Pearl, J.: Heuristics: intelligent search strategies for computer problem solving, p. 382. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. (1984)
15. Mitchell, M.: An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms, p. 209. MIT Press (1998)
16. Goldberg, D.E.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, p. 372. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. (1989)
17. Koza, J.R.: Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection, p. 680. MIT Press (1992)
18. Dawkins, R.: The BlindWatchmaker, 1st edn., p. 358. Longman, Essex (1986)
19. Kim, H.S., Cho, S.B.: Application of interactive genetic algorithm to fashion design. In: Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence (2000)
20. Chen, Y.-P.: Interactive music composition with the CFE framework. SIGEVOlution 2(1), 9-16 (2007)
21. Bavota, G., Carnevale, F., De Lucia, A., Di Penta, M., Oliveto, R.: Putting the developer in-the-loop: an interactive GA for software re-modularization. In: Fraser, G., Teixeira de Souza, J. (eds.) SSBSE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7515, pp. 75-89. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
22. Van Der Straeten, R., Jonckers, V., Mens, T.: A formal approach to model refactoring and model refinement. J. SoSyM 6(2), 139-162 (2007)
23. Van Kempen, M., et al.: Towards proving preservation of behaviour of refactoring of UML models. In: Proceedings of the annual SAICSIT 2005, pp. 252-259. White River, South Africa (2005)
24. Mens, T., Taentzer, G., Runge, O.: Analysing refactoring dependencies using graph transformation. J. SoSyM 6(3), 269-285 (2007)
25. Biermann, E.: EMF model transformation based on graph transformation: formal foundation and tool environment. In: Ehrig, H., Rensink, A., Rozenberg, G., Schürr, A. (eds.) ICGT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6372, pp. 381-383. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
26. El Boussaidi, G., Mili, H.: Understanding design patterns - what is the problem? Software: Practice and Experience (2011)
27. Seng, O., Stammel, J., Burkhart, D.: Search-based determination of refactorings for improving the class structure of object-oriented systems. In: Proc. of the 8th Annual GECCO 2006, pp. 1909-1916. ACM, Seattle (2006)
28. Jensen, A.C., Cheng, B.H.C.: On the use of genetic programming for automated refactoring and the introduction of design patterns. In: Proc. of the 12th Annual GECCO 2010, pp. 1341-1348. ACM, Portland (2010)
29. Kessentini, M., et al.: Search-based model transformation by example. J. SoSyM 11(2), 209-226 (2012)