Decomposing the changes of energy-related carbon emissions in China: Evidence from the PDA approach

Natural Hazards

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1109-1122

  Zhang, Yue Jun ^a   Da, Ya Bin ^a  

^a BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Distance functions; Environmental DEA; PDA

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC GROWTH; ENERGY USE; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY;

CHINA;

EID: 84884909178     PISSN: 0921030X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-013-0752-5     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ang BW (1999) Is the energy intensity a less useful indicator than the carbon factor in the study of climate change? Energy Policy 27: 943-946.
2. Ang BW (2004) Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? Energy Policy 32: 1131-1139.
3. 2 emissions in manufacturing. Energy Economics 19: 363-374.
4. Ang BW, Zhang FQ (2000) A survey of index decomposition on analysis in energy and environmental studies. Energy 25: 1149-1176.
5. Ang BW, Liu FL, Chew EP (2003) Perfect decomposition techniques in energy and environmental analysis. Energy Policy 31: 1561-1566.
6. Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert WE (1982) Multilateral comparisons of output, input and productivity using superlative index numbers. Econ J 92: 73-86.
7. 2 emission (1989-2004) in Taiwan by input-output structural decomposition. Energy Policy 36: 2471-2480.
8. ERI (Energy Research Institute, National Development and Reform Commission) (2003) China sustainable energy and carbon emissions scenario analysis comprehensive report.
9. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review 84: 66-83.
10. 2 emissions change from energy consumption in Brazil: challenges and policy implications. Energy Policy 39: 1495-1504.
11. 2 emissions in Greece for 1990-2002: a decomposition analysis and comparison of results using the arithmetic mean Divisia Index and logarithmic mean Divisia Index techniques. Energy 33: 492-499.
12. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2006) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories.
13. 2 emissions in China: a distance function approach. Ecol Econ 70: 77-85.
14. Li HN, Mu HL, Zhang M, Gui SS (2012) Analysis of regional difference on impact factors of China's energy-related CO2 emissions. Energy 39: 319-326.
15. 2 emissions: characteristics inter-regional transfer and emission reduction policies. Energy Policy 39: 6136-6144.
16. NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China) (2011) China statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing.
17. NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of China), NDRC (National Development and Reform Commission) (2011) China energy statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press, Beijing.
18. 2 emission from energy use in India: a decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 32: 585-593.
19. Sun JW (1998) Changes in energy consumption and energy intensity: a complete decomposition model. Energy Economics 20: 85-100.
20. 2 emission in China: 1957-2000. Energy 30: 73-83.
21. Zhang M, Mu HL, Ning YD (2009) Accounting for energy-related CO2 emission in China, 1991-2006. Energy Policy 37: 767-773.
22. 2 emissions within a joint production framework. Energy Economics 34: 1088-1097.
23. 2 emissions: a production-theoretical approach. Energy Economics 30: 1054-1067.
24. Zhou P, Ang BW, Han JY (2010) Total factor carbon emission performance: a Malmquist index analysis. Energy Economics 32: 194-201.
25. 2 emission performance in electricity generation: a non-radial directional distance function approach. Eur J Oper Res 221: 625-635.