Effects of visual conflicts on 3D selection task performance in stereoscopic display environments

IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interface 2013, 3DUI 2013 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 115-118

  Bruder, Gerd ^a   Steinicke, Frank ^a   Sturzlinger, Wolfgang ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3D USER INTERFACE; DIRECT-TOUCH INTERACTIONS; DISPLAY SURFACE; EFFECTIVE THROUGHPUT; HAPTIC FEEDBACKS; STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAY; TASK PERFORMANCE; THREE DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES;

DISPLAY DEVICES; GEOMETRICAL OPTICS; USER INTERFACES;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 84884871668     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/3DUI.2013.6550207     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. L.-W. Chan, H.-S. Kao, M. Y. Chen, M.-S. Lee, J. Hsu, and Y.-P. Hung. Touching the void: Direct-touch interaction for intangible displays. In Proc. of ACM CHI, pages 2625-2634, 2010
2. J. P. Djajadiningrat. Cubby: What You See is Where You Act. Interlacing the display and manipulation spaces. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, 1998
3. J. Ferwerda. Psychophysics 101: How to run perception experiments in computer graphics. In SIGGRAPH Core, 2008
4. P. M. Fitts. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exp. Psych., 47:381-391, 1954
5. R. T. Held, E. A. Cooper, J. F. O'Brien, and M. S. Banks. Using blur to affect perceived distance and size. ACM TOG, 29(2):1-16, 2010
6. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/DIS 9241-9 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices, 2000
7. G. Liu, R. Chua, and J. T. Enns. Attention for perception and action: task interference for action planning, but not for online control. Exp. Brain Res., 185:709-717, 2008
8. J. M. Loomis and J. M. Knapp. Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In L. J. Hettinger and M. W. Haas, editors, Virtual and adaptive environments, volume Virtual and adaptive environments. Mahwah, 2003
9. C. L. MacKenzie, R. G. Marteniuka, C. Dugasa, D. Liskea, and B. Eickmeiera. Three-dimensional movement trajectories in fitts' task: Implications for control. Q.J. Exp. Psychology-A, 39(4):629-647, 1987
10. I. S. MacKenzie and P. Isokoski. Fitts' throughput and the speedaccuracy tradeoff. In Proc. of ACM CHI, pages 1633-1636, 2008
11. M. R. Mine, F. P. Brooks, Jr., and C. H. Sequin. Moving objects in space: exploiting proprioception in virtual-environment interaction. In Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH, pages 19-26, 1997
12. A. Paljic, S. Coquillart, and J.-M. Burkhardt. A study of distance of manipulation on the responsive workbench. In Proc. of IPT, pages 1-8, 2002
13. I. Poupyrev, S.Weghorst, M. Billinghurst, and T. Ichikawa. Egocentric Object Manipulation in Virtual Environments: Empirical Evaluation of Interaction Techniques. Computer Graphics Forum, 17(3):41-52, 1998
14. R. J. Teather and W. Stürzlinger. Cursors for 3D pointing. In Proc. of ACM 3DCHI Workshop, pages 5-12, 2012
15. W. Thompson, R. Fleming, S. Creem-Regehr, and J. K. Stefanucci. Visual Perception from a Computer Graphics Perspective. A. K. Peters / CRC Press, 2011
16. D. Valkov, F. Steinicke, G. Bruder, and K. H. Hinrichs. 2D Touching of 3D Stereoscopic Objects. In Proc. of ACM CHI, pages 1353-1362, 2011
17. Y. Wang and C. MacKenzie. Effects of orientation disparity between haptic and graphic displays of objects in virtual environments. In Proc. of INTERACT, pages 391-398, 1999
18. Y. Yuan and A. Steed. Is the Rubber Hand Illusion induced by immersive virtual reality? In Proc. of IEEE VR, pages 95-102, 2010.