Are foreclosures contagious?an exploratory space-time analysis of franklin county, Ohio, 2001-2008

International Journal of Applied Geospatial Research

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 19-36

  Murray, Alan T ^a   Koschinsky, Julia ^a   Liu, Yin ^b   Rey, Sergio J ^a   Brown, Lawrence A ^c  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SICHUAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Foreclosures; Hotspots; Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA) Markov; Space Time Analysis; Spatial Association; Spillover Effects

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884825795     PISSN: 19479654     EISSN: 19479662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jagr.2013100102     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aalbers, M. (2009). Geographies of the financial crisis. Area, 41(1), 34-42.
2. Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27, 93-115. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
3. Anselin, L. (2005). Exploring spatial data with Geo-Da: A workbook. Urbana, IL. Urbana, Champaign: Spatial Analysis Laboratory, University of Illinois.
4. Been, V., Ellen, I., & Madar, J. (2009). The high cost of segregation: Exploring racial disparities in high-cost lending. The Fordham Urban Law Journal, 36, 361-393.
5. Biswas, A. (2010). Foreclosures and housing prices in a heterogeneous housing market: Spatial externalities, crowding-in and filtering effects over the short-and long-run. Clark University, 2010. United States-Massachusetts: ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
6. Brunsdon, C. (1995). Estimating probability surfaces for geographical point data: An adaptive kernel algorithm. Computers & Geosciences, 21(7), 877-894. doi:10.1016/0098-3004(95)00020-9
7. Carroll, T. M., Clauretie, T. M., Neill, H., & Jor-gensen, C. (1995). HUD versus private bank foreclosures: A spatial and temporal analysis. Journal of Housing Economics, 2(4), 183-194. doi:10.1006/jhec.1995.1009
8. Chan, S., Gedal, M., Been, V., & Haughwout, A. F. (2010). The role of neighborhood characteristics in mortgage default risk: Evidence from New York City. SSRN Working paper (June 29, 2010). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/ abstract=1631944
9. Clauretie, T. M., & Daneshvary, N. (2009). Estimating the house foreclosure discount corrected for spatial price interdependence and endogeneity of marketing time. Real Estate Economics, 37(1), 43-67. doi:10.1111/j.1540- 6229.2009.00234.x
10. Cui, L. (2010). Foreclosure, vacancy and crime. University of Pittsburgh, Department of Economics, Working Paper.
11. Di, W., Ma, J., & Murdoch, J. C. (2010). An analysis of the neighborhood impacts of a mortgage assistance program: A spatial hedonic model. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(4), 682-697. doi:10.1002/pam.20530
12. Diggle, P. J. (1983). Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns. London, UK: Academic Press.
13. Ding, L., Quercia, R. G., & Ratcliffe, J. (2010). Neighborhood subprime lending and the performance of community reinvestment mortgages. Journal of Real Estate Research, 32(3), 341-376.
14. Doms, M., Furlong, F., & Krainer, J. (2007). Subprime mortgage delinquency rates. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 2007-33.
15. Frame, W. S. (2010). Estimating the effect of mortgage foreclosures on nearby property values: A critical review of the literature. Economic Review (Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta), 95(3), 1-9.
16. Harding, J. P., Rosenblatt, E., & Yao, V. W. (2009). The contagion effect of foreclosed properties. Journal of Urban Economics, 66(3), 164-178. doi:10.1016/j. jue.2009.07.003
17. Harding, J. P., Rosenblatt, E., & Yao, V. W. (2010). The foreclosure discount: Myth or reality? (January 11, 2010). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1534966
18. Hartley, D. A. (2010). The effect of foreclosures on nearby housing prices: Supply or disamenity? (September 2, 2010). Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Working Paper No. 10-11. Retrieved from http://ssrn. com/abstract=1670820
19. Immergluck, D. (2008). From the subprime to the exotic: Excessive mortgage market risk and foreclosures. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(1), 59-76.
20. Immergluck, D. (2009). Foreclosed: High-risk lending, deregulation, and the undermining of America's mortgage market. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21. Immergluck, D. (2009). The foreclosure crisis, foreclosed properties, and federal policy: Some implications for housing and community development planning. Journal of the American Planning Association. American Planning Association, 75(4), 406-423. doi:10.1080/01944360903124316
22. Immergluck, D. (2010). Neighborhoods in the wake of the debacle: Intrametropolitan patterns of foreclosed properties. Urban Affairs Review, 46(1), 3-36. doi:10.1177/1078087410375404
23. Immergluck, D. (2011). The local wreckage of global capital: The subprime crisis, federal policy and high-foreclosure neighborhoods in the U.S. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(1), 130-146. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00991.x
24. Immergluck, D., & Smith, G. (2006a). The impact of single-family mortgage foreclosures on neighborhood crime. Housing Studies, 21(6), 851-866. doi:10.1080/02673030600917743
25. Immergluck, D., & Smith, G. (2006b). The external costs of foreclosure: The impact of single-family mortgage foreclosures on property values. Housing Policy Debate, 17(1), 57-79. doi:10.1080/1051148 2.2006.9521561
26. Johnson, M. P., Turcotte, D. A., & Sullivan, F. M. (2010). What foreclosed homes should a municipality purchase to stabilize vulnerable neighborhoods? Networks and Spatial Economics, 10(3), 363-388. doi:10.1007/s11067-010-9138-3
27. Kirk, D., & Hyra, D. (2010). Home foreclosures and community crime: Causal or spurious association? (October 25, 2010). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1697871
28. Kobie, T. F., & Lee, S. (2011). The spatial-temporal impact of residential foreclosures on single-family residential property values. Urban Affairs Review, 47(1), 3-30. doi:10.1177/1078087410376614
29. Lee, K. (2008). Foreclosure's price-depressing spillover effects on local properties: A literature review. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston: Community Affairs Discussion Paper 2008-01.
30. Li, Y., & Morrow-Jones, H. A. (2010). The impact of residential mortgage foreclosure on neighborhood change and succession. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 30(1), 22-39. doi:10.1177/0739456X10375305
31. Lin, Z., Rosenblatt, E., & Yao, V. W. (2009). Spillover effects of foreclosures on neighborhood property values. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 38(4), 387-407. doi:10.1007/s11146-007-9093-z
32. Mikelbank, B. (2008). Spatial analysis of the impact of vacant, abandoned and foreclosed properties. Working paper submitted to the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Office of Community Affairs.
33. Miller, N. (2009). The Neighborhood impact of sub-prime lending, predatory lending, and foreclosure. FMA European Conference.
34. Mortgage Bankers Association. (2009). Delinquencies and foreclosures continue to climb in Latest MBA National Delinquency Survey. Press Release, May 28.
35. Mortgage Bankers Association. (2011). Short-term delinquencies fall to pre-recession levels, loans in foreclosure tie all-time record in latest MBA National Delinquency Survey. Press Release, February 17. Retrieved February 20, 2011.
36. Newman, K. (2010). Go public! Using publicly available data to understand the foreclosure crisis. Journal of the American Planning Association. American Planning Association, 76(2), 160-171. doi:10.1080/01944360903586738
37. Pennington-Cross, A. (2006). The value of foreclosed property. Journal of Real Estate Research, 28(2), 193-214.
38. Rey, S. (2001). Spatial empirics for economic growth and convergence. Geographical Analysis, 33, 195-214. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.2001.tb00444.x
39. Rogers, W. H. (2010). Declining foreclosure neighborhood effects over time. Housing Policy Debate, 20(4), 687-706. doi:10.1080/10511482.2 010.505845
40. Rogers, W. H., & Winter, W. (2009). The impact of foreclosures on neighboring housing sales. Journal of Real Estate Research, 31(4), 455-479.
41. Rugh, J., & Massey, D. S. (2010). Racial segregation and the American foreclosure crisis. American Sociological Review, 75(5), 629-651. doi:10.1177/0003122410380868
42. Schintler, L. Istrate, E., Pelletiere, D., & Kulkarni, R. (2010). The spatial aspects of the foreclosure crisis: A look at the New England region. (October 15, 2010). GMU School of Public Policy Research Paper No. 2010-28. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1692969
43. Schuetz, J., Been, V., & Gould Ellen, I. (2008). Neighborhood effects of concentrated mortgage foreclosures. Journal of Housing Economics, 17(4), 306-319. doi:10.1016/j.jhe.2008.09.004
44. Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
45. Squires, G. D. (2005). Predatory lending: Redlining in reverse. Shelterforce. The Journal of Affordable Housing and Community Building, 139(January/February).
46. Sumell, A. J. (2009). The determinants of foreclosed property values: Evidence from Inner-City Cleveland. Journal of Housing Research, 18(1), 45-61.
47. Tammy, L., & Murdoch, J. C. (2009). The neighborhood effects of foreclosure. Journal of Geographical Systems, 11(4), 317-332. doi:10.1007/s10109-009-0088-6
48. Vesselinov, E., & Beveridge, A. (2010, August 14). Avenues to wealth or roads to financial ruin? Homeownership and the distribution of mortgage foreclosures. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Hilton Atlanta and Atlanta Marriott Marquis, Atlanta, GA.