Evaluation of post-combustion CO2 capture technologies

Advanced Materials Research

Volumn 734-737, Issue , 2013, Pages 1881-1886

  Li, Yuan ^a   Wang, Qi Min ^a   Wang, Pei Bin ^a  

^a SHENYANG INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING   (China)

Author keywords

CO2 capture; Cost of electricity(COE); Econamine FG PlusSM technology; Post combustion

Indexed keywords

COMBINED CYCLE PLANT; COST OF ELECTRICITY; IMPROVED PROCESS; MONOETHANOLAMINE; NATIONAL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY; POST-COMBUSTION; POST-COMBUSTION CO; PULVERIZED COALS;

COAL; COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANTS; COMBUSTION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COSTS; DESIGN; ETHANOLAMINES; GREENHOUSE GASES; TECHNOLOGY;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

EID: 84884792281     PISSN: 10226680     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.734-737.1881     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. 2, IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Report Number PH4/33, November 2004
2. Ronald L. Schoff: Updated Market-Based Advanced Coal Power Systems Comparison Study, presented at the 22nd Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, September 12-15, 2005
3. 2 Removal, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA U.S. Department of Energy-Office of Fossil Energy, Germantown, MD and U. S Department of Energy/NETL, Pittsburgh, PA: 2000
4. 2 Capture, presented at GPA Gas Treatment Conference, February 2008.
5. 2 Capture, EPRI Report 1004880, April 2004
6. SM Plus Process to Canadian Coal-Based Power Plants, presented at Clean Coal Session of Combustion Canada Conference, Vancouver, Canada, September 22-24, 2003
7. TAG® Technical Assessment Guide: Volume 3, Revision 8: Fundamentals and Methods Electricity Supply, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 1999. TR-100281-V3R8.