Affirming the status quo?: The FCC, ALJs, and agency adjudications

George Washington Law Review

Volumn 80, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1527-1545

  Kapnik, Benjamin ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884790978     PISSN: 00168076     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Philip J. Weiser, Institutional Design, FCC Reform, and the Hidden Side of the Administrative State, 61 ADMIN. L. REV. 675, 704 (2009).
2. JONATHAN E. NUECHTERLEIN & PHILIP J. WEISER, DIGITAL CROSSROADS: AMERICAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY IN THE INTERNET AGE 233-60 (2005).
3. Jack Shafer, The Honest Graft of Lady Bird Johnson: How She and Lyndon Came by Their Millions, SLATE (July 16, 2007, 5:06 PM), http://www.slate.com/ articles/news-And-politics/press-box/2007/07/the-honest-graft-of-lady-bird- johnson.html.
4. Bernard Schwartz, Comparative Television and the Chancellor's Foot, 47 GEO. L.J. 655, 690-93 (1959).
5. Cecilia Kang, FCC's Net Neutrality Rules to Trigger Legal, Hill Challenge, WASH. POST TECH BLOG (Sept. 13, 2011, 12:32 PM), http://www. washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-Tech/post/fccs-net-neutrality-rules-To-Trigger- legal-hill-challenge/2011/09/13/gIQALFzlPK-blog.html
6. Peter Cleveland, Spectrum Auction Would Be a Winner, POLITICO (Oct. 11, 2011, 9:23 PM), http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/65644.html
7. GDP-by-industry, Value Added by Industry, U.S. BUREAU OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS (Dec. 13, 2011), http://www.bea.gov/iTable
8. ROGER ENTNER & DAVID LEWIN, THE IMPACT OF THE US WIRELESS TELECOM INDUSTRY ON THE US ECONOMY 3 (2005), available at http://files.ctia.org/pdf/ Report-OVUM-Economy.pdf.
9. Philip J. Weiser -Dean, UNIV. OF COLO. LAW SCH., http://lawweb.colorado. edu/profiles/profile.jsp?id=62 (last visited Apr. 6, 2012).
10. Robert D. Atkinson, INFO. TECH. & INNOVATION FOUND., http://www.itif.org/people/robert-d-Atkinson (last visited Mar. 30, 2012).
11. Robert C. Atkinson, Telecom Regulation for the 21st Century: Avoiding Gridlock, Adapting to Change, 4 J. TELECOMM. & HIGH TECH. L. 379, 396-97 & n.45 (2006).
12. Jake Sherman & John Bresnahan, Parties Still Far Apart on Supercommittee Deficit Deal, POLITICO (Oct. 27, 2011, 11:27 PM), http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/67045.html.
13. RICHARD J. PIERCE, JR., ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TREATISE § 8.1 (5th ed. 2010).
14. Walter Gellhorn, The Administrative Procedure Act: The Beginnings, 72 VA. L. REV. 219, 231 (1986)
15. VANESSA K. BURROWS, CONG. RESEARCH SERV., RL34607, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES: AN OVERVIEW 1 (2010).
16. Jeffrey S. Lubbers, Federal Administrative Law Judges: A Focus on Our Invisible Judiciary, 33 ADMIN. L. REV. 109, 112 (1981).
17. Jeffrey S. Lubbers, The Federal Administrative Judiciary: Establishing an Appropriate System of Performance Evaluation for ALJs, 7 ADMIN. L.J. AM. U. 589, 590 (1994).
18. PAUL R. VERKUIL ET AL., ADMIN. CONFERENCE OF THE U.S., RECOMMENDATIONS & REPORTS 985, 1018 (1992).
19. JAMES C. DUFF, JUDICIAL BUS. OF THE U.S. COURTS, 2010 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR 175 tbl.c-5 (2010), available at http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/ Statistics/Judicial Business/2010/JudicialBusinespdfversion.pdf.
20. Office of Administrative Law Judges Staff, FED. COMMC'NS COMM'N, http://www.fcc. gov/encyclopedia/office-Administrative-law-judges-staff (last visited Mar. 30, 2012).
21. Orin S. Kerr, Shedding Light on Chevron: An Empirical Study of the Chevron Doctrine in the U.S. Courts of Appeals, 15 YALE J. ON REG. 1, 30 (1998).
22. Aaron P. Avila, Student Article, Application of the Chevron Doctrine in the D.C. Circuit, 8 N.Y.U. ENVTL. L.J. 398, 429 (2000).
23. Kristin E. Hickman & Matthew D. Krueger, In Search of the Modern Skidmore Standard, 107 COLUM. L. REV. 1235, 1275 (2007).
24. Richard J. Pierce, Jr. & Joshua Weiss, An Empirical Study of Judicial Review of Agency Interpretations of Agency Rules, 63 ADMIN. L. REV. 515, 520 (2011).
25. David Zaring, Reasonable Agencies, 96 VA. L. REV. 135, 137 (2010).
26. Richard J. Pierce, Jr., What Do the Studies of Judicial Review of Agency Actions Mean?, 63 ADMIN. L. REV. 77, 90 (2011)
27. Circuit court data for this section was derived from the Judicial Business of the U.S. Courts, U.S. COURTS, http://www.uscourts.gov/Statistics/ JudicialBusiness.aspx (last visited Mar. 30, 2012).
28. Chris Guthrie & Tracey E. George, The Futility of Appeal: Disciplinary Insights into the "Affirmance Effect" on the United States Courts of Appeals, 32 FLA. ST. U. L. REV. 357, 363 (2005).
29. See Charles H. Koch, Jr., Policymaking by the Administrative Judiciary, 56 ALA. L. REV. 693, 700 & n.36 (2005)
30. James P. Timony, Performance Evaluation of Federal Administrative Law Judges, 7 ADMIN. L.J. AM. U. 629, 640-41 (1994)